|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 21, 2015 19:11:08 GMT
Although it's not about him, what are your views on Blissett TBoner? He is work in progress,a lot different to Taylor as he doesn't get the simple chances like Taylor does and plays a different role.His ball control leaves a bit to be desired,but I feel that we will see a better player come next term.We have seen the best of Taylor, sadly his best is a long long way from being good enough. As Taylor is more of a 'work horse', could he not play in a different position? ACM for example, with him and Sinclair buzzing about, we would win more balls in advanced positions on the pitch would we not? For someone who appears pretty short, he wins a lot of aero-balls, where as Blissett didn't seem to win any today. I agree about Blissett's touch, very shaky indeed!
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 21, 2015 19:04:24 GMT
Although it's not about him, what are your views on Blissett TBoner?
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 21, 2015 18:23:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 21, 2015 18:12:17 GMT
Was it not her birthday at New Years when we played Turkey?
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 21, 2015 18:09:27 GMT
Some on here (maybe just one) slates Taylor to the hilt, but nothing regarding Blissett? He was beyond woeful today, and Harrison really showed him up when he came on at HT!
We defo miss Sinclair in the middle, waay too much hoof ball and missing midfield altogether.
But...We won, so bovv'd?
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 21, 2015 1:47:13 GMT
I can't believe people took up this offer to be honest!
I only want to pay full whack, mainly because I have every faith that we'll win the league! And if not, then I want to be sat with my fellow gas heads and not in a neutral zone!
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 21, 2015 1:42:07 GMT
Well funny you should say that, because according to the panel, they took a majority suggestion of yellow, which was taken from social media (unsure where), and then the designs were made, so there was 'involvment', maybe you just need to get involved more? Oh and do vote old chap, be a sport! I would be interested (and this isn't a dig)in knowing what and where this research came from because other then someone posting a copy of tweet today it is the first I had seen or heard of any interaction re: the kit Same, and like others said on the other forum, it should of been posted on here and there, tweeted on the Official BRFC account, Facebook and discussed at the Q&A. I would even go one further, and say that I would of asked other formers to design their own kit, then they all get voted on, shortlisted, and from that, the final designs go up for a vote, that way they should all at least be liked, and then whichever one won, the supports would agree (mostly) and be fairly happy.
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 20, 2015 13:00:15 GMT
Nothing wrong with being a bit different, I can't say I've seen the design of 1 before, although 2 and 3 have been used by other clubs, Celtic had something similar to 3 didn't they? And for that reason I can't vote 3, so 1 it is! Like someone else said, at least we're being involved! I expect we're (Rovers) are under some contract, and these were the designs made, throwing your toys out the pram aren't going to get them changed, so start liking one or two (of the kits) and get involved! It's only a bloody kit for Christ's sake!but surely taking your attitude is no better. you are lecturing to grown men. It's like politicians who say you don't have a say if you don;t vote. so what if you don;t like any of them or don;t like the system that THEY have designed, for their own convenience? being given 3 awful designs to choose from is not being 'involved' in my book. Well funny you should say that, because according to the panel, they took a majority suggestion of yellow, which was taken from social media (unsure where), and then the designs were made, so there was 'involvment', maybe you just need to get involved more? Oh and do vote old chap, be a sport!
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 20, 2015 8:04:46 GMT
Nothing wrong with being a bit different, I can't say I've seen the design of 1 before, although 2 and 3 have been used by other clubs, Celtic had something similar to 3 didn't they? And for that reason I can't vote 3, so 1 it is!
Like someone else said, at least we're being involved!
I expect we're (Rovers) are under some contract, and these were the designs made, throwing your toys out the pram aren't going to get them changed, so start liking one or two (of the kits) and get involved! It's only a bloody kit for Christ's sake!
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 17, 2015 13:15:06 GMT
Taken from the other forum - Messaged Nigel Turner,here was his reply. Jimmy - As you can imagine, I totally understand how you feel but actually Steve Cotterill was NOT mocking Rovers and I was making that point clear. However, you may have noticed that there were sone very bad technical glitches on the transmission last night. One of them came at the exact point when I emphasised that Steve was NOT referring to Rovers but as the picture and sound skipped, it lost the word NOT and gave totally the opposite impression. I am totally mortified that this has happened. It comes at a tine when we have built a really good relationship with both managers and both sets of supporters. Please believe me that this was a million to one chance - a technical glitch which has un-done months of hard work. The technicians are looking into the circumstances on the recording and transmission which also affected the news programme.
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 15, 2015 17:01:36 GMT
Soz, I had know idea what I was doing then! I think someone was talking to me!
Yeah they took more to Wrexham than we did to Grimsby...
My bad!
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 15, 2015 14:03:06 GMT
Ah...right soz, yeah I must admit I only really look here!
Cheers for the heads up!
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 15, 2015 13:44:36 GMT
At'ernoon! First off, I'd like to say that I used to use the other forum, but it's waaaay too miserable, everything's a negative and taken way too seriously, this form seems much more friendly, loads more banter, and I think the forum is set up better for use on mobiles! I looked at the Barnet forum yesterday to read their match thread etc, and noticed on their home page they have links to all the other league teams forums at the top (see here - www.onlybarnet.com/forum/)Is this something we could have? Is there any point? Do others pop on the other forums etc? Just an idea really! YT
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 15, 2015 13:39:34 GMT
Well on Barnet's match thread they seemed happy that they took more to Wrexham than we did to Grimsby, but it would of only been by double figures if that (I've not seen the official numbers)
So it would be good if we could take a load all the way up there!
Edited!
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 15, 2015 1:05:43 GMT
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 15, 2015 0:55:53 GMT
More city hatred ... boring Could always get the Palace song going?! That one lasts, it'll last more than 4 lines about Sinclair that's for sure...
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 15, 2015 0:50:57 GMT
I went and watched Saints this week vs Wet Spam, and apart from chanting, 'you're just a sh** Rickie Lambert' at Andy Carroll They sang this, which I think we could defo blag! QUE SERA SERA (When I was a little boy...) When I was just a little boy, I asked my mother what should I be, Should I be Pompey, (Change to C*ty) Should I be Saints, (Change to Gas) Here’s what she said to me, Wash your mouth out son, And go get your father's gun, And shoot the Pompey scum, (C*ty) And support the saints, (Gas) We hate Pompey! (C*ty) We hate Pompey! (C*ty) m.fanchants.com/football-songs/southampton-chants/just-a-little-boy/ (I can't find a YouTube clip :-() Which then goes straight into, Oh when the Gas go marching in (but slow!!)
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 14, 2015 21:05:50 GMT
I'm on, until the end! Duck tape me in!
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 14, 2015 21:03:44 GMT
Latest as of 21/12/2013 & 21/12/2014 Luton (Position - 2nd) Pl 23, W13, D8, L2, GF47, GA21, GD+26, Pts47 Rovers (Position - 3rd) Pl 26, W12, D10, L4, GF31, GA22, GD+9, Pts46 Latest as of 28/12/2013 & 28/12/2014 Luton (Position - 1st) Pl 25, W15, D8, L2, GF55, GA22, GD+33, Pts53 Rovers (Position - 2nd) Pl 28, W14, D10, L4, GF37, GA23, GD+14, Pts52 Latest as of 15/02/2014 & 14/02/2015 Luton (Position - 1st) Pl 30, W19, D9, L2, GF,69 GA24, GD+45, Pts66 Rovers (Position - 2nd) Pl 34, W17, D13, L4, GF45, GA26, GD+19, Pts64
|
|
|
Post by yatetown85 on Feb 14, 2015 17:00:26 GMT
Admin, please remove this post.it is offensive why are you assuming it is a rude word? it could be cult or clit He's defo the latter ;-)
|
|