Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 12:18:36 GMT
Only having 5 tv’s, only being able to go the pub 6 times per week, being limited to just 20 fags per day, only being able to afford to get the kids a takeaway 5 nights per week, the kids not having the latest Xbox on the first day of its release, only having one car in the household, only having one foreign holiday each year.... Overseas probably more defined as a makeshift home, barely any income, no education system, no access to healthcare..... Makeshift home, barely an income, no education system, no healthcare, you been reading the Tory manifesto again? Eric, read? That's an Oxymoron. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 12:20:01 GMT
Liz Truss being cut to pieces on housing by Andrew Neil.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 12:22:20 GMT
Labour Manifesto - It seems as though they classify the top 5% rich bastards as anyone earning over 80,000k a year.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 12:24:49 GMT
Thick as sh** It's not our fault, it's all the services (which we dont fund properly) Tory home secretary Priti Patel says 'you can't blame the Government… flip.it/sojN2o |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 12:28:08 GMT
Liz Truss still being torn up.
On Social Care
"We recognise it's an issue that needs looking at"
Umm, yes, well,
What can anyone say to that?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 13:02:30 GMT
So Labour want to introduce a Financial Transaction Tax? Are they insane?
Sweden introduced this in 1984. The result was a disaster for the Swedish Stock Exchange. Instead of paying the tax on your Trading, you just move your Trading to an Exchange where you don't have to pay the tax.
|
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Nov 21, 2019 13:10:45 GMT
So Labour want to introduce a Financial Transaction Tax? Are they insane? Sweden introduced this in 1984. The result was a disaster for the Swedish Stock Exchange. Instead of paying the tax on your Trading, you just move your Trading to an Exchange where you don't have to pay the tax. 1984? Have they recovered since then? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 13:13:56 GMT
So Labour want to introduce a Financial Transaction Tax? Are they insane? Sweden introduced this in 1984. The result was a disaster for the Swedish Stock Exchange. Instead of paying the tax on your Trading, you just move your Trading to an Exchange where you don't have to pay the tax. 1984? Have they recovered since then? Only after they removed the FTT. Withing one year of introducing it, 50% of their Stock Market transactions had moved to London. Imagine the cost if 50% of London Trading moved to New York, Hong Kong, Chicago, Singapore etc. |
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Nov 21, 2019 13:17:12 GMT
Labour Manifesto - It seems as though they classify the top 5% rich bastards as anyone earning over 80,000k a year. An MP's salary is £79,500. Just saying. 😎 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 13:24:21 GMT
Only having 5 tv’s, only being able to go the pub 6 times per week, being limited to just 20 fags per day, only being able to afford to get the kids a takeaway 5 nights per week, the kids not having the latest Xbox on the first day of its release, only having one car in the household, only having one foreign holiday each year.... Overseas probably more defined as a makeshift home, barely any income, no education system, no access to healthcare..... Makeshift home, barely an income, no education system, no healthcare, you been reading the Tory manifesto again? Nope. Just think it’s massively disrespectful when we refer to people in the uk with all their benefits, health and education living in poverty when they don’t even come close to the millions in genuine poverty overseas. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 13:26:50 GMT
Labour Manifesto - It seems as though they classify the top 5% rich bastards as anyone earning over 80,000k a year. An MP's salary is £79,500. Just saying. 😎 But they are also promising an initial 5% pay rise across the Public Sector with above inflation rises every year after that. Does MP's pay come under 'public sector'? |
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Nov 21, 2019 13:33:22 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 13:36:12 GMT
Look, both sides are doing it. It's how they operate in this new fangled Social Media world. Labour had their own 'fact site' last week which didn't mention it was a Labour site on the front page. |
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Nov 21, 2019 13:37:36 GMT
Makeshift home, barely an income, no education system, no healthcare, you been reading the Tory manifesto again? Nope. Just think it’s massively disrespectful when we refer to people in the uk with all their benefits, health and education living in poverty when they don’t even come close to the millions in genuine poverty overseas. That's a different topic, and one I agree with. |
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Nov 21, 2019 13:40:03 GMT
An MP's salary is £79,500. Just saying. 😎 But they are also promising an initial 5% pay rise across the Public Sector with above inflation rises every year after that. Does MP's pay come under 'public sector'? Not by default. Pay review body recommendation then voted on by......? |
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Nov 21, 2019 13:42:31 GMT
Look, both sides are doing it. It's how they operate in this new fangled Social Media world. Labour had their own 'fact site' last week which didn't mention it was a Labour site on the front page. I though no one gave a toss about Social media. Raab said so.. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 13:48:40 GMT
But they are also promising an initial 5% pay rise across the Public Sector with above inflation rises every year after that. Does MP's pay come under 'public sector'? Not by default. Pay review body recommendation then voted on by......? Ah, so it's vote for us if you work in the Public sector, nudge, nudge, wink, wink possible pay rise......and in six months time that 5% pay rise we spoke about in the Manifesto was just 'an aspiration' ? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 13:49:32 GMT
Look, both sides are doing it. It's how they operate in this new fangled Social Media world. Labour had their own 'fact site' last week which didn't mention it was a Labour site on the front page. I though no one gave a toss about Social media. Raab said so.. I don't, but it appears as though you do  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 14:58:59 GMT
So Labour want to introduce a Financial Transaction Tax? Are they insane? Sweden introduced this in 1984. The result was a disaster for the Swedish Stock Exchange. Instead of paying the tax on your Trading, you just move your Trading to an Exchange where you don't have to pay the tax. From that radical left wing socialist rag, Bloomberg All told, the benefits of a tax on trading far outweigh the costs. It would generate much-needed revenue. It would favor longer-term investors over speculators. It would put a little useful resistance into the financial system, preventing it from overheating or spinning out of control. And it would pass the fairness test by placing the cost of running the system on the people who use it most.
And It’s not as if this were radical socialism. Hong Kong, perennially rated the world’s freest economy by the conservative Heritage Foundation, has had a 0.1% tax on financial transactions for years. The levy has had no discernible negative effect on its economy, though it might be responsible for a relative lack of high-frequency trading
link www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-06-20/the-case-for-a-financial-transaction-tax |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 17:48:13 GMT
Liz Truss being cut to pieces on housing by Andrew Neil. “I don’t have the figures”. Lying cow. Is there anyone in that party who is capable of telling the truth? If they can’t build 200,000 starter homes does anyone seriously think they will build 40 hospitals? And yet they won’t lose a vote. |
|
