Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 17:39:33 GMT
From what I saw that’s just Corbyn voicing approval of people who have said some mildly controversial stuff. I’m sure there is plenty out there to throw at Corbyn (and justifiably so) but that isn’t it imo. He’s trying too hard to reach the conclusion that he started out with.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 18:29:43 GMT
A few blinkered and brainwashed individuals looking very uncomfortable there. Have to admit I wasn’t surprised by any of the comments - the girl at the end was a classic “head in sand” moment. As the yoof say “Awks”!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 18:37:26 GMT
From what I saw that’s just Corbyn voicing approval of people who have said some mildly controversial stuff. I’m sure there is plenty out there to throw at Corbyn (and justifiably so) but that isn’t it imo. He’s trying too hard to reach the conclusion that he started out with. But that’s not really the point though is it - everyone already knows Corbyn has said and done some stupid stuff over the years. It’s the brainwashed reactions of these Corbyn disciples that is most interesting. The blinkered loyalty and unwillingness to accept their leaders flaws reminds me of those girls that sang their support for Charles Manson at his trial.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 19:03:42 GMT
From what I saw that’s just Corbyn voicing approval of people who have said some mildly controversial stuff. I’m sure there is plenty out there to throw at Corbyn (and justifiably so) but that isn’t it imo. He’s trying too hard to reach the conclusion that he started out with. But that’s not really the point though is it - everyone already knows Corbyn has said and done some stupid stuff over the years. It’s the brainwashed reactions of these Corbyn disciples that is most interesting. The blinkered loyalty and unwillingness to accept their leaders flaws reminds me of those girls that sang their support for Charles Manson at his trial. In the meantime Johnson refuses to face any form of informed and detailed questions. General election: Boris Johnson snubs second TV interview after avoiding Andrew Neil flip.it/QkU4j1Which is why, I guess, those who hold ill informed opinions vote for him. Or is it something worse?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 19:14:36 GMT
From what I saw that’s just Corbyn voicing approval of people who have said some mildly controversial stuff. I’m sure there is plenty out there to throw at Corbyn (and justifiably so) but that isn’t it imo. He’s trying too hard to reach the conclusion that he started out with. But that’s not really the point though is it - everyone already knows Corbyn has said and done some stupid stuff over the years. It’s the brainwashed reactions of these Corbyn disciples that is most interesting. The blinkered loyalty and unwillingness to accept their leaders flaws reminds me of those girls that sang their support for Charles Manson at his trial. The point is would it be any different for any other party? We can see this on forums all around the internet - “Your leader said this”, “who cares, what about your leader who said that”. We’ve seen it on this very thread. Do you really think the reaction would be different if the guardian trolled Tories with the Islamophobia in their party? People only care about the state of the opposition’s reputation and how they can smear it when really, if we could put the partisanship aside, we should collectively be pretty ashamed that these candidates as a whole are the best of British politics. Basically, all that guy did is tell us that water is wet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 19:24:01 GMT
Nothing surprising there from the anti-tories. Some very concerning people in that video.
The guy in the red hat literally has no words to get out of it. Utterly embarrassing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 19:27:22 GMT
I see Boris makes time in his schedule to pop in to the This Morning studio for a fierce grilling by Phil and his sidekick followed by a round of selfies but can’t face Andrew Neil or Piers Morgan for that matter. Trying to win over a load of housewives is obviously a better strategy than being properly scrutinised. Total chicken. Housewives' votes count too, no?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 19:52:16 GMT
I see Boris makes time in his schedule to pop in to the This Morning studio for a fierce grilling by Phil and his sidekick followed by a round of selfies but can’t face Andrew Neil or Piers Morgan for that matter. Trying to win over a load of housewives is obviously a better strategy than being properly scrutinised. Total chicken. Housewives' votes count too, no? What do you think “trying to win over a load of housewives” was referring to?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 20:00:10 GMT
Housewives' votes count too, no? What do you think “trying to win over a load of housewives” was referring to? Just wondering why you singled them out?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 20:04:13 GMT
What do you think “trying to win over a load of housewives” was referring to? Just wondering why you singled them out? Who do you think watches This Morning? Do you?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 20:08:20 GMT
But that’s not really the point though is it - everyone already knows Corbyn has said and done some stupid stuff over the years. It’s the brainwashed reactions of these Corbyn disciples that is most interesting. The blinkered loyalty and unwillingness to accept their leaders flaws reminds me of those girls that sang their support for Charles Manson at his trial. In the meantime Johnson refuses to face any form of informed and detailed questions. General election: Boris Johnson snubs second TV interview after avoiding Andrew Neil flip.it/QkU4j1Which is why, I guess, those who hold ill informed opinions vote for him. Or is it something worse? Smart move by Andrew Neil, he’s managed to get a couple of digs in on Boris by publicly calling him out: www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50679252Edit: He’s full on goading him, love it. Boris will of course duck it and it’s the smart move but Neil has played a blinder there letting questions of trust hang in the air when there will be no attempt from Boris to try and set the record straight.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 20:10:46 GMT
In the meantime Johnson refuses to face any form of informed and detailed questions. General election: Boris Johnson snubs second TV interview after avoiding Andrew Neil flip.it/QkU4j1Which is why, I guess, those who hold ill informed opinions vote for him. Or is it something worse? Smart move by Andrew Neil, he’s managed to get a couple of digs in on Boris by publicly calling him out: www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50679252Yep. Watch: Andrew Neil eviscerates Boris Johnson over interview no show | Coffee House flip.it/cnYYQ8He can run...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 20:10:52 GMT
Just wondering why you singled them out? Who do you think watches This Morning? Do you? No just wondered, as it sounds as though you don't think a housewife's vote is worth as much as someone who watches Andrew Neil.
A vote is a vote.
Shock, the PM is canvassing a different audience.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 20:18:25 GMT
Who do you think watches This Morning? Do you? No just wondered, as it sounds as though you don't think a housewife's vote is worth as much as someone who watches Andrew Neil.
A vote is a vote.
Shock, the PM is canvassing a different audience. You assume that everyone who watches This Morning will vote. Who is, logically, more likely to vote out of viewers of This Morning vs an actual programme devoted to discussing politics?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 20:33:29 GMT
No just wondered, as it sounds as though you don't think a housewife's vote is worth as much as someone who watches Andrew Neil.
A vote is a vote.
Shock, the PM is canvassing a different audience. You assume that everyone who watches This Morning will vote. Who is, logically, more likely to vote out of viewers of This Morning vs an actual programme devoted to discussing politics? No I don't.
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Dec 5, 2019 20:33:52 GMT
If he wont do it, do this
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 20:33:52 GMT
Who do you think watches This Morning? Do you? No just wondered, as it sounds as though you don't think a housewife's vote is worth as much as someone who watches Andrew Neil.
A vote is a vote.
Shock, the PM is canvassing a different audience. A vote is indeed a vote. And a vote is to be won by promoting an agenda and being questioned on that agenda. Johnson is running and hiding from scrutiny.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 20:35:09 GMT
You assume that everyone who watches This Morning will vote. Who is, logically, more likely to vote out of viewers of This Morning vs an actual programme devoted to discussing politics? No I don't.
Okay
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 20:35:41 GMT
If he wont do it, do this A blonde wig on a frozen chicken should do it. Although I don’t think he needs to do anything now, he’s tucked Boris up enough with that 3 minute segment. Over to you Boris....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2019 21:13:01 GMT
From what I saw that’s just Corbyn voicing approval of people who have said some mildly controversial stuff. I’m sure there is plenty out there to throw at Corbyn (and justifiably so) but that isn’t it imo. He’s trying too hard to reach the conclusion that he started out with. Which one is you on that video ?
|
|