|
Post by francegas on May 19, 2022 20:48:24 GMT
Hang on. Is Starmer accused of attending a leaving party? Did his team in Hartlepool send out a shopper for more booze. Has there been over a 100 fixed penalty notices handed out to his staff? Now whether he handled the issue (if there is an issue) of him organising food as part of a working period whilst campaigning in a by-election well, is indeed open to question. But there is absolutely no equivalence to what was going on in Downing St. As is widely stated, the fish rots from the head and Johnson is morally rotten to the core. 1.No he's accused of attending a party. I'm sure you and Yatton would agree 20+ people in attendance constitutes a party. (Although no doubt neither of you will admit it) 2. No they didn't send out a shopper for more booze because when they new Mr Hypocrite would be in attendance they ordered the beers in advance! 3. No fixed penalty notices issued as yet because it's still under investigation. You know full well that Durham Police (who are up Starmers a**e) will not issue a FPN not because he hasn't broken covid laws but because they don't want to be responsible for bringing down the leader and deputy leader of the opposition. 4. Lied over the fact that the hotel were not serving food...when they were. 5. Lied over the fact they returned to work after their curry when the agenda as issued stated the day finished after the curry. 6. Lied over the fact Rayner was in attendance....apologies it was a honest mistake that no one knew she was there. 7. It might not be equivalent to what went on at Downing Street but does that really make it right. As you say a fish rots from the head and Starmer is rotten to the core not only in his current role but his previous as director of public prosecutions, and I think you and Yatton know what I'm referring to.
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on May 19, 2022 20:53:26 GMT
Hang on. Is Starmer accused of attending a leaving party? Did his team in Hartlepool send out a shopper for more booze. Has there been over a 100 fixed penalty notices handed out to his staff? Now whether he handled the issue (if there is an issue) of him organising food as part of a working period whilst campaigning in a by-election well, is indeed open to question. But there is absolutely no equivalence to what was going on in Downing St. As is widely stated, the fish rots from the head and Johnson is morally rotten to the core. 1.No he's accused of attending a party. I'm sure you and Yatton would agree 20+ people in attendance constitutes a party. (Although no doubt neither of you will admit it) 2. No they didn't send out a shopper for more booze because when they new Mr Hypocrite would be in attendance they ordered the beers in advance! 3. No fixed penalty notices issued as yet because it's still under investigation. You know full well that Durham Police (who are up Starmers a**e) will not issue a FPN not because he hasn't broken covid laws but because they don't want to be responsible for bringing down the leader and deputy leader of the opposition. 4. Lied over the fact that the hotel were not serving food...when they were. 5. Lied over the fact they returned to work after their curry when the agenda as issued stated the day finished after the curry. 6. Lied over the fact Rayner was in attendance....apologies it was a honest mistake that no one knew she was there. 7. It might not be equivalent to what went on at Downing Street but does that really make it right. As you say a fish rots from the head and Starmer is rotten to the core not only in his current role but his previous as director of public prosecutions, and I think you and Yatton know what I'm referring to. Are you a parody or a real person ? 🙄
|
|
|
Post by francegas on May 19, 2022 20:58:42 GMT
1.No he's accused of attending a party. I'm sure you and Yatton would agree 20+ people in attendance constitutes a party. (Although no doubt neither of you will admit it) 2. No they didn't send out a shopper for more booze because when they new Mr Hypocrite would be in attendance they ordered the beers in advance! 3. No fixed penalty notices issued as yet because it's still under investigation. You know full well that Durham Police (who are up Starmers a**e) will not issue a FPN not because he hasn't broken covid laws but because they don't want to be responsible for bringing down the leader and deputy leader of the opposition. 4. Lied over the fact that the hotel were not serving food...when they were. 5. Lied over the fact they returned to work after their curry when the agenda as issued stated the day finished after the curry. 6. Lied over the fact Rayner was in attendance....apologies it was a honest mistake that no one knew she was there. 7. It might not be equivalent to what went on at Downing Street but does that really make it right. As you say a fish rots from the head and Starmer is rotten to the core not only in his current role but his previous as director of public prosecutions, and I think you and Yatton know what I'm referring to. Are you a parody or a real person ? 🙄 As per Yatton you have a distinct inability to accept someone may just have a different view than you. (Typical of the left). And an inability to respond sensibly to a reply to a post. 🙄🙄
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on May 19, 2022 21:00:26 GMT
Are you a parody or a real person ? 🙄 As per Yatton you have a distinct inability to accept someone may just have a different view than you. (Typical of the left). And an inability to respond sensibly to a reply to a post. 🙄🙄 I think I gave it the disdain it deserves 😃
|
|
|
Post by fintanstack on May 19, 2022 21:03:18 GMT
Hang on. Is Starmer accused of attending a leaving party? Did his team in Hartlepool send out a shopper for more booze. Has there been over a 100 fixed penalty notices handed out to his staff? Now whether he handled the issue (if there is an issue) of him organising food as part of a working period whilst campaigning in a by-election well, is indeed open to question. But there is absolutely no equivalence to what was going on in Downing St. As is widely stated, the fish rots from the head and Johnson is morally rotten to the core. 1.No he's accused of attending a party. I'm sure you and Yatton would agree 20+ people in attendance constitutes a party. (Although no doubt neither of you will admit it) 2. No they didn't send out a shopper for more booze because when they new Mr Hypocrite would be in attendance they ordered the beers in advance! 3. No fixed penalty notices issued as yet because it's still under investigation. You know full well that Durham Police (who are up Starmers a**e) will not issue a FPN not because he hasn't broken covid laws but because they don't want to be responsible for bringing down the leader and deputy leader of the opposition. 4. Lied over the fact that the hotel were not serving food...when they were. 5. Lied over the fact they returned to work after their curry when the agenda as issued stated the day finished after the curry. 6. Lied over the fact Rayner was in attendance....apologies it was a honest mistake that no one knew she was there. 7. It might not be equivalent to what went on at Downing Street but does that really make it right. As you say a fish rots from the head and Starmer is rotten to the core not only in his current role but his previous as director of public prosecutions, and I think you and Yatton know what I'm referring to. I have had to eat a meal with over twenty work colleagues and it was not a party.
|
|
|
Post by francegas on May 19, 2022 21:06:26 GMT
Oh look no further action being taken by the Met Police on Boris. So he didn't break any further lockdown rules. I trust Yatton accepts that as he will when "Sir" Hypocrite is let off by Duram Police.
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on May 19, 2022 21:08:05 GMT
Oh look no further action being taken by the Met Police on Boris. So he didn't break any further lockdown rules. I trust Yatton accepts that as he will when "Sir" Hypocrite is let off by Duram Police. He’s already been found guilty ! Bloody hell , this is hard work 🙄
|
|
|
Post by francegas on May 19, 2022 21:09:00 GMT
1.No he's accused of attending a party. I'm sure you and Yatton would agree 20+ people in attendance constitutes a party. (Although no doubt neither of you will admit it) 2. No they didn't send out a shopper for more booze because when they new Mr Hypocrite would be in attendance they ordered the beers in advance! 3. No fixed penalty notices issued as yet because it's still under investigation. You know full well that Durham Police (who are up Starmers a**e) will not issue a FPN not because he hasn't broken covid laws but because they don't want to be responsible for bringing down the leader and deputy leader of the opposition. 4. Lied over the fact that the hotel were not serving food...when they were. 5. Lied over the fact they returned to work after their curry when the agenda as issued stated the day finished after the curry. 6. Lied over the fact Rayner was in attendance....apologies it was a honest mistake that no one knew she was there. 7. It might not be equivalent to what went on at Downing Street but does that really make it right. As you say a fish rots from the head and Starmer is rotten to the core not only in his current role but his previous as director of public prosecutions, and I think you and Yatton know what I'm referring to. I have had to eat a meal with over twenty work colleagues and it was not a party. As did Boris then and they weren't parties then. What's good for one has to be good for the other .
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on May 19, 2022 21:11:00 GMT
I have had to eat a meal with over twenty work colleagues and it was not a party. As did Boris then and they weren't parties then. What's good for one has to be good for the other . You will literally believe anything won’t you ? Next you’ll be telling us he got all the big calls right 😂🤣😂🤣
|
|
|
Post by oldie on May 19, 2022 21:11:27 GMT
Hang on. Is Starmer accused of attending a leaving party? Did his team in Hartlepool send out a shopper for more booze. Has there been over a 100 fixed penalty notices handed out to his staff? Now whether he handled the issue (if there is an issue) of him organising food as part of a working period whilst campaigning in a by-election well, is indeed open to question. But there is absolutely no equivalence to what was going on in Downing St. As is widely stated, the fish rots from the head and Johnson is morally rotten to the core. 1.No he's accused of attending a party. I'm sure you and Yatton would agree 20+ people in attendance constitutes a party. (Although no doubt neither of you will admit it) 2. No they didn't send out a shopper for more booze because when they new Mr Hypocrite would be in attendance they ordered the beers in advance! 3. No fixed penalty notices issued as yet because it's still under investigation. You know full well that Durham Police (who are up Starmers a**e) will not issue a FPN not because he hasn't broken covid laws but because they don't want to be responsible for bringing down the leader and deputy leader of the opposition. 4. Lied over the fact that the hotel were not serving food...when they were. 5. Lied over the fact they returned to work after their curry when the agenda as issued stated the day finished after the curry. 6. Lied over the fact Rayner was in attendance....apologies it was a honest mistake that no one knew she was there. 7. It might not be equivalent to what went on at Downing Street but does that really make it right. As you say a fish rots from the head and Starmer is rotten to the core not only in his current role but his previous as director of public prosecutions, and I think you and Yatton know what I'm referring to. Whether it was right or wrong we shall discover. But I don't think rants like this, where you just making things up is conducive to a reasonable discussion. Whatever the rights and wrongs of how Starmer handled this there is no debate, is there, that he was there only because of the by election. The details of who was there, the agenda produced to drive what happened, is a far cry from a Christmas party and a leaving party that occured not only on Johnson's watch, but we are lead to believe he attended with regard to the leaving party for his now ex communications director. There is no equivalence. Johnson is not only morally bankrupt but the whiff of corruption around his government is pervasive. It's all totally indefensible and an affront to our democracy.
|
|
|
Post by francegas on May 19, 2022 21:12:09 GMT
Oh look no further action being taken by the Met Police on Boris. So he didn't break any further lockdown rules. I trust Yatton accepts that as he will when "Sir" Hypocrite is let off by Duram Police. He’s already been found guilty ! Bloody hell , this is hard work 🙄 Hang on you've been harping on that he broke lockdown rules countless times. So now if Starmer is found guilty you will accept they were as bad as each other. Can't wait for that admission.
|
|
|
Post by oldie on May 19, 2022 21:12:58 GMT
1.No he's accused of attending a party. I'm sure you and Yatton would agree 20+ people in attendance constitutes a party. (Although no doubt neither of you will admit it) 2. No they didn't send out a shopper for more booze because when they new Mr Hypocrite would be in attendance they ordered the beers in advance! 3. No fixed penalty notices issued as yet because it's still under investigation. You know full well that Durham Police (who are up Starmers a**e) will not issue a FPN not because he hasn't broken covid laws but because they don't want to be responsible for bringing down the leader and deputy leader of the opposition. 4. Lied over the fact that the hotel were not serving food...when they were. 5. Lied over the fact they returned to work after their curry when the agenda as issued stated the day finished after the curry. 6. Lied over the fact Rayner was in attendance....apologies it was a honest mistake that no one knew she was there. 7. It might not be equivalent to what went on at Downing Street but does that really make it right. As you say a fish rots from the head and Starmer is rotten to the core not only in his current role but his previous as director of public prosecutions, and I think you and Yatton know what I'm referring to. I have had to eat a meal with over twenty work colleagues and it was not a party. Food was poor? Eating at your desk not conducive to a party atmosphere?
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on May 19, 2022 21:15:33 GMT
He’s already been found guilty ! Bloody hell , this is hard work 🙄 Hang on you've been harping on that he broke lockdown rules countless times. So now if Starmer is found guilty you will accept they were as bad as each other. Can't wait for that admission. Yes , as I’ve told you before he should resign. He won’t be found guilty though because he hasn’t . looking forward to the Sue Gray report , should make great reading 👀
|
|
|
Post by oldie on May 19, 2022 21:15:52 GMT
He’s already been found guilty ! Bloody hell , this is hard work 🙄 Hang on you've been harping on that he broke lockdown rules countless times. So now if Starmer is found guilty you will accept they were as bad as each other. Can't wait for that admission. Nobody has to wait. Rightly or wrongly Starmer has said he will step down if he is charged by the police and issued a fixed penalty notice. Johnson? No he just throws his staff under the bus. Morally bankrupt, quite possibly corrupt and a coward.
|
|
|
Post by francegas on May 19, 2022 21:16:46 GMT
1.No he's accused of attending a party. I'm sure you and Yatton would agree 20+ people in attendance constitutes a party. (Although no doubt neither of you will admit it) 2. No they didn't send out a shopper for more booze because when they new Mr Hypocrite would be in attendance they ordered the beers in advance! 3. No fixed penalty notices issued as yet because it's still under investigation. You know full well that Durham Police (who are up Starmers a**e) will not issue a FPN not because he hasn't broken covid laws but because they don't want to be responsible for bringing down the leader and deputy leader of the opposition. 4. Lied over the fact that the hotel were not serving food...when they were. 5. Lied over the fact they returned to work after their curry when the agenda as issued stated the day finished after the curry. 6. Lied over the fact Rayner was in attendance....apologies it was a honest mistake that no one knew she was there. 7. It might not be equivalent to what went on at Downing Street but does that really make it right. As you say a fish rots from the head and Starmer is rotten to the core not only in his current role but his previous as director of public prosecutions, and I think you and Yatton know what I'm referring to. Whether it was right or wrong we shall discover. But I don't think rants like this, where you just making things up is conducive to a reasonable discussion. Whatever the rights and wrongs of how Starmer handled this there is no debate, is there, that he was there only because of the by election. The details of who was there, the agenda produced to drive what happened, is a far cry from a Christmas party and a leaving party that occured not only on Johnson's watch, but we are lead to believe he attended with regard to the leaving party for his now ex communications director. There is no equivalence. Johnson is not only morally bankrupt but the whiff of corruption around his government is pervasive. It's all totally indefensible and an affront to our democracy. Sorry Oldie but what have I made up? Every point I've made is out there for everyone to see in the media.
|
|
|
Post by oldie on May 19, 2022 21:17:26 GMT
Hang on you've been harping on that he broke lockdown rules countless times. So now if Starmer is found guilty you will accept they were as bad as each other. Can't wait for that admission. Yes , as I’ve told you before he should resign. He won’t be found guilty though because he hasn’t . looking forward to the Sue Gray report , should make great reading 👀 That will be a non event now. After chucking his team under the bus Johnson will claim there was a problem and he dealt with it. A coward.
|
|
|
Post by oldie on May 19, 2022 21:19:38 GMT
Whether it was right or wrong we shall discover. But I don't think rants like this, where you just making things up is conducive to a reasonable discussion. Whatever the rights and wrongs of how Starmer handled this there is no debate, is there, that he was there only because of the by election. The details of who was there, the agenda produced to drive what happened, is a far cry from a Christmas party and a leaving party that occured not only on Johnson's watch, but we are lead to believe he attended with regard to the leaving party for his now ex communications director. There is no equivalence. Johnson is not only morally bankrupt but the whiff of corruption around his government is pervasive. It's all totally indefensible and an affront to our democracy. Sorry Oldie but what have I made up? Every point I've made is out there for everyone to see in the media. I have been to meetings, team meetings, where there was more than 20 people in the room. It was definitely not a party. You made that bit up.
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on May 19, 2022 21:20:02 GMT
Yes , as I’ve told you before he should resign. He won’t be found guilty though because he hasn’t . looking forward to the Sue Gray report , should make great reading 👀 That will be a non event now. After chucking his team under the bus Johnson will claim there was a problem and he dealt with it. A coward. There’s mileage in this yet….. 😉
|
|
|
Post by oldie on May 19, 2022 21:23:35 GMT
That will be a non event now. After chucking his team under the bus Johnson will claim there was a problem and he dealt with it. A coward. There’s mileage in this yet….. 😉 He is such a smug entitled w**ker, you just want to confront him and watch him wilt in front of you. In fact the majority of the front bench. It's hard to accept that these people, this absolute bunch of incompetents actually represent us. My god.
|
|
|
Post by gashead79 on May 19, 2022 22:30:30 GMT
This thread could make a million pages since there's no compromise. Bojo is obviously a wrong un but the opposition are totally useless. Posters have their preferred political leanings but the MPs are useless. You lot will argue forever.
|
|