|
Post by Westy on Nov 23, 2020 22:10:06 GMT
I listened to the first ten minutes or so. It was like a "Listen with Mother" programme for 5 year olds. In that short period his whole basis for arguing against social restrictions is that a substantial number of people are immune due to exposure to other Corona viruses and or Sars. In other words it's the old herd immunity argument. That's what Trump has let rip in the States, that's a health disaster over there. So basically this is a load of bollox. But each to their own, if you don't believe in any action to suppress infection, fine go ahead and catch it. Just don't give it to anyone else. If you find yourself becoming seriously ill then tough sh**, the NHS have no moral obligation to look after you and risk their own lives. The Jackanory style of story telling on Edward Jenner was hilarious. Yeah I pulled Yeadons last load of bollocks apart on here the other day which was roundly ignored. He is regularly on twitter spouting sh**e and never responds to fair critique. He was the one in that JHB interview. Turned out to be utterly wrong in time. I don't leave the gas-works much, but I'd be interested to see your pulling apart of his stuff (genuinely!) A good scientist will never say anything is a "fact". So in that respect, I'm always trying to disprove the things I believe as I go along. Point. Counter. Point. In the words of another man better than I! I'm reading stuff both sides of the fence as I go along. Only way to do it really š
|
|
yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,469
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Nov 23, 2020 22:10:31 GMT
You should listen to Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bakhdi. A former professor at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz and head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene and one of the most cited research scientists in German history. I think I'm gonna have to come find you on the terraces with 2 beers in my hand one day! Crackpot corner ?
|
|
|
Post by Westy on Nov 23, 2020 22:11:10 GMT
I think I'm gonna have to come find you on the terraces with 2 beers in my hand one day! Crackpot corner ? š
Ok I'll give you that made me chuckle
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 19,461
|
Post by pirate on Nov 23, 2020 22:16:49 GMT
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 19,461
|
Post by pirate on Nov 23, 2020 22:17:52 GMT
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 19,461
|
Post by pirate on Nov 23, 2020 22:20:04 GMT
Looks like you are almost trying to imply some sort of 'guilt by association'. You can find the same interview elsewhere (not youtube lol) and Dr Yeadon has regularly appeared on the mainstream Talkradio. Thankfully the censorship hasn't stopped the video being viewed 230,000 times. Talk radio has more than its fair share of crackpots You've been ringing in again then?
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Nov 23, 2020 22:27:33 GMT
Yeah I pulled Yeadons last load of bollocks apart on here the other day which was roundly ignored. He is regularly on twitter spouting sh**e and never responds to fair critique. He was the one in that JHB interview. Turned out to be utterly wrong in time. I don't leave the gas-works much, but I'd be interested to see your pulling apart of his stuff (genuinely!) A good scientist will never say anything is a "fact". So in that respect, I'm always trying to disprove the things I believe as I go along. Point. Counter. Point. In the words of another man better than I! I'm reading stuff both sides of the fence as I go along. Only way to do it really š Fair play all I would say is make sure you dig down to source. The one put on here by Yardley for example was cut for sensationalism but actully the interview was much longer, more caveats and 2 months old so all of what was said had been proven wrong by that point. The latest one about death rate not going up is another great example. Amazing clickbait for the skeptical but actually far too early to draw conclusions on that data set. So of course it looks low. Scratch under the surface and go to the actual source is my advice. If you are doing that on both sides you are doing it right.
|
|
yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,469
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Nov 23, 2020 22:34:07 GMT
Neil OāBrien MP: JUST ONE GRAPH IN THE DAILY MAIL - a thread. The Daily Mail published this chart. 2 things about it struck me. First, Iād seen the same data from the ONS, which sadly showed excess deaths in recent weeks ā in fact higher than any time in the last 5 years. But this chart purported to show just the opposite. First, the Mail: And now the ONS data. It is back above the highest levels we have seen in recent years. Given it is a lagging indicator, it may keep rising for a bit yet. Second, the source looked very strange. Instead of just āOffice for National Statistics", the source says āStatistics Guyā. Strangeā¦ The first clue as to what is going on is that āThe Statistics Guyā turns out to be a cranky Covid-denial twitter feed, run by a guy with a cartoon avatar. He advertises things like mass demonstrations against āThe Great Resetā (a weird conspiracy theory, donāt ask). The second clue is in the small print. āAdjusted for population growthā, says the Mail. Hmmm. Given that the last ONS data for UK population is for 2019, and the 2020 number isnāt out till June 2021, clearly these arenāt official stats. What are they assuming? Cartoon avatar Statistics Guy pops up elsewhere challenging the official statistics and saying the statistics should be āAdjusted for 3.3% population growth? ā (his question marks). We can also see the original chart from Statistics Guy on his twitter (posted 13th November), which is what the Daily Mail have copied exactly. He says he has used āpopulation growth over the past 5 years to amend the upper and lower record for each weekā If we look at week 44, which he & the Mail highlight, he shows 10,887 deaths in week 44, which is what ONS have. But the highest it's been anytime in the last 5 years was 10164 in 2019. Statistics guy shows a maximum of 10,861, which appears in the Mail. That's a 6.86% increase. But of course, there is no way the population has increased by 6.8% in a year. Between 2018 and 2018 it increased 0.54%. If anything weād expect growth over the last year to be slower because of a near halt to international migration, excess deaths and so on. It is quite strange that the graph cuts off there. The next week of data had come out on the 17th, and the Mail published on the 20th. But oddly, they chose not to publish the next week of data, which showed excess deaths rising to over 200 a day above the 5 year average. Odd. Why am I going on about one wrong graph? Because actually it's not just one graph: in fact the papers are filled with a torrent of this kind of thing: āHey, thereās no real coronavirus problem, we can call just get back to normalā. Sadly, it's just not true. Why am I going on about one wrong graph? Because actually it's not just one graph: in fact the papers are filled with a torrent of this kind of thing: āHey, thereās no real coronavirus problem, we can call just get back to normalā. Sadly, it's just not true. The vaccine is coming soon, life will get back to normal. But in the meantime, we need to protect people's lives and health through a difficult winter. END
|
|
|
Post by aghast on Nov 23, 2020 22:36:33 GMT
I was buying into this until I saw the name 'Peter Hitchens'.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Nov 23, 2020 22:39:44 GMT
Neil OāBrien MP: JUST ONE GRAPH IN THE DAILY MAIL - a thread. The Daily Mail published this chart. 2 things about it struck me. First, Iād seen the same data from the ONS, which sadly showed excess deaths in recent weeks ā in fact higher than any time in the last 5 years. But this chart purported to show just the opposite. First, the Mail: And now the ONS data. It is back above the highest levels we have seen in recent years. Given it is a lagging indicator, it may keep rising for a bit yet. Second, the source looked very strange. Instead of just āOffice for National Statistics", the source says āStatistics Guyā. Strangeā¦ The first clue as to what is going on is that āThe Statistics Guyā turns out to be a cranky Covid-denial twitter feed, run by a guy with a cartoon avatar. He advertises things like mass demonstrations against āThe Great Resetā (a weird conspiracy theory, donāt ask). The second clue is in the small print. āAdjusted for population growthā, says the Mail. Hmmm. Given that the last ONS data for UK population is for 2019, and the 2020 number isnāt out till June 2021, clearly these arenāt official stats. What are they assuming? Cartoon avatar Statistics Guy pops up elsewhere challenging the official statistics and saying the statistics should be āAdjusted for 3.3% population growth? ā (his question marks). We can also see the original chart from Statistics Guy on his twitter (posted 13th November), which is what the Daily Mail have copied exactly. He says he has used āpopulation growth over the past 5 years to amend the upper and lower record for each weekā If we look at week 44, which he & the Mail highlight, he shows 10,887 deaths in week 44, which is what ONS have. But the highest it's been anytime in the last 5 years was 10164 in 2019. Statistics guy shows a maximum of 10,861, which appears in the Mail. That's a 6.86% increase. But of course, there is no way the population has increased by 6.8% in a year. Between 2018 and 2018 it increased 0.54%. If anything weād expect growth over the last year to be slower because of a near halt to international migration, excess deaths and so on. It is quite strange that the graph cuts off there. The next week of data had come out on the 17th, and the Mail published on the 20th. But oddly, they chose not to publish the next week of data, which showed excess deaths rising to over 200 a day above the 5 year average. Odd. Why am I going on about one wrong graph? Because actually it's not just one graph: in fact the papers are filled with a torrent of this kind of thing: āHey, thereās no real coronavirus problem, we can call just get back to normalā. Sadly, it's just not true. Why am I going on about one wrong graph? Because actually it's not just one graph: in fact the papers are filled with a torrent of this kind of thing: āHey, thereās no real coronavirus problem, we can call just get back to normalā. Sadly, it's just not true. The vaccine is coming soon, life will get back to normal. But in the meantime, we need to protect people's lives and health through a difficult winter. END There you go. Same story as the JHB interview. Posted recently as justifying why case aren't rising (which immediately gets my back up because trust me, they really are). Turns out the interview was done right before the second peak. Was he wrong at the time? No. Is it still relevant? f**k no! Trust me I hate this government. Shambolic response. Anyone with a vague interest in general chat knows how critical I've been of them all. Are they lying to you? Are their lips moving? Are sage trying to scare you? Probably yes because you keep going to the f**king pub, spreading misinformation, not wearing your damn mask and going on bollocks anti lockdown demonstrations! Are the death rates exaggerated? No. Are they lower now? Yes (treatment improved). Are there dodgy test results? Almost certainly. But is coronavirus real? Yes. Is it bad? Yes. Is it like flu? No. Are the hospitals filling up with people suffocating to death? Yes. Will most people be ok? Yes. There's no global conspiracy here I'm afraid. Just a sh**ty situation being butchered by an incompetent government and public health body that couldn't organise a w**k on a lunchbreak. And thats it. No wonder half of these scientists can't get their heads round it. It shouldn't happen. It shouldn't NEED to happen. Where other countries have strategised and executed better responses they haven't had to do half the crap we have. And I'll bet the same people who criticise the response will hear nothing negative of the government that orchestrated such a dire state of affairs. I feel a bit better now.
|
|
yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,469
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Nov 23, 2020 22:46:57 GMT
Neil OāBrien MP: JUST ONE GRAPH IN THE DAILY MAIL - a thread. The Daily Mail published this chart. 2 things about it struck me. First, Iād seen the same data from the ONS, which sadly showed excess deaths in recent weeks ā in fact higher than any time in the last 5 years. But this chart purported to show just the opposite. First, the Mail: And now the ONS data. It is back above the highest levels we have seen in recent years. Given it is a lagging indicator, it may keep rising for a bit yet. Second, the source looked very strange. Instead of just āOffice for National Statistics", the source says āStatistics Guyā. Strangeā¦ The first clue as to what is going on is that āThe Statistics Guyā turns out to be a cranky Covid-denial twitter feed, run by a guy with a cartoon avatar. He advertises things like mass demonstrations against āThe Great Resetā (a weird conspiracy theory, donāt ask). The second clue is in the small print. āAdjusted for population growthā, says the Mail. Hmmm. Given that the last ONS data for UK population is for 2019, and the 2020 number isnāt out till June 2021, clearly these arenāt official stats. What are they assuming? Cartoon avatar Statistics Guy pops up elsewhere challenging the official statistics and saying the statistics should be āAdjusted for 3.3% population growth? ā (his question marks). We can also see the original chart from Statistics Guy on his twitter (posted 13th November), which is what the Daily Mail have copied exactly. He says he has used āpopulation growth over the past 5 years to amend the upper and lower record for each weekā If we look at week 44, which he & the Mail highlight, he shows 10,887 deaths in week 44, which is what ONS have. But the highest it's been anytime in the last 5 years was 10164 in 2019. Statistics guy shows a maximum of 10,861, which appears in the Mail. That's a 6.86% increase. But of course, there is no way the population has increased by 6.8% in a year. Between 2018 and 2018 it increased 0.54%. If anything weād expect growth over the last year to be slower because of a near halt to international migration, excess deaths and so on. It is quite strange that the graph cuts off there. The next week of data had come out on the 17th, and the Mail published on the 20th. But oddly, they chose not to publish the next week of data, which showed excess deaths rising to over 200 a day above the 5 year average. Odd. Why am I going on about one wrong graph? Because actually it's not just one graph: in fact the papers are filled with a torrent of this kind of thing: āHey, thereās no real coronavirus problem, we can call just get back to normalā. Sadly, it's just not true. Why am I going on about one wrong graph? Because actually it's not just one graph: in fact the papers are filled with a torrent of this kind of thing: āHey, thereās no real coronavirus problem, we can call just get back to normalā. Sadly, it's just not true. The vaccine is coming soon, life will get back to normal. But in the meantime, we need to protect people's lives and health through a difficult winter. END There you go. Same story as the JHB interview. Posted recently as justifying why case aren't rising (which immediately gets my back up because trust me, they really are). Turns out the interview was done right before the second peak. Was he wrong at the time? No. Is it still relevant? f**k no! Precisely why I didnāt waste half hour of my life watching a crackpot video. Instead Iāve probably wasted more time dispelling it ! š People do seem to go down these bloody wormholes and start believing all sorts of nonsense. Itāll be the qanon conspiracy next.... god help us ( them!)
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Nov 23, 2020 22:50:15 GMT
There you go. Same story as the JHB interview. Posted recently as justifying why case aren't rising (which immediately gets my back up because trust me, they really are). Turns out the interview was done right before the second peak. Was he wrong at the time? No. Is it still relevant? f**k no! Precisely why I didnāt waste half hour of my life watching a crackpot video. Instead Iāve probably wasted more time dispelling it ! š People do seem to go down these bloody wormholes and start believing all sorts of nonsense. Itāll be the qanon conspiracy next.... god help us ( them!) sorry. I missed this whilst making a significant edit to my original post. It will be the vaccines next just wait and see.
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 19,461
|
Post by pirate on Nov 23, 2020 23:01:22 GMT
Neil OāBrien MP: JUST ONE GRAPH IN THE DAILY MAIL - a thread. The Daily Mail published this chart. 2 things about it struck me. First, Iād seen the same data from the ONS, which sadly showed excess deaths in recent weeks ā in fact higher than any time in the last 5 years. But this chart purported to show just the opposite. First, the Mail: And now the ONS data. It is back above the highest levels we have seen in recent years. Given it is a lagging indicator, it may keep rising for a bit yet. Second, the source looked very strange. Instead of just āOffice for National Statistics", the source says āStatistics Guyā. Strangeā¦ The first clue as to what is going on is that āThe Statistics Guyā turns out to be a cranky Covid-denial twitter feed, run by a guy with a cartoon avatar. He advertises things like mass demonstrations against āThe Great Resetā (a weird conspiracy theory, donāt ask). The second clue is in the small print. āAdjusted for population growthā, says the Mail. Hmmm. Given that the last ONS data for UK population is for 2019, and the 2020 number isnāt out till June 2021, clearly these arenāt official stats. What are they assuming? Cartoon avatar Statistics Guy pops up elsewhere challenging the official statistics and saying the statistics should be āAdjusted for 3.3% population growth? ā (his question marks). We can also see the original chart from Statistics Guy on his twitter (posted 13th November), which is what the Daily Mail have copied exactly. He says he has used āpopulation growth over the past 5 years to amend the upper and lower record for each weekā If we look at week 44, which he & the Mail highlight, he shows 10,887 deaths in week 44, which is what ONS have. But the highest it's been anytime in the last 5 years was 10164 in 2019. Statistics guy shows a maximum of 10,861, which appears in the Mail. That's a 6.86% increase. But of course, there is no way the population has increased by 6.8% in a year. Between 2018 and 2018 it increased 0.54%. If anything weād expect growth over the last year to be slower because of a near halt to international migration, excess deaths and so on. It is quite strange that the graph cuts off there. The next week of data had come out on the 17th, and the Mail published on the 20th. But oddly, they chose not to publish the next week of data, which showed excess deaths rising to over 200 a day above the 5 year average. Odd. Why am I going on about one wrong graph? Because actually it's not just one graph: in fact the papers are filled with a torrent of this kind of thing: āHey, thereās no real coronavirus problem, we can call just get back to normalā. Sadly, it's just not true. Why am I going on about one wrong graph? Because actually it's not just one graph: in fact the papers are filled with a torrent of this kind of thing: āHey, thereās no real coronavirus problem, we can call just get back to normalā. Sadly, it's just not true. The vaccine is coming soon, life will get back to normal. But in the meantime, we need to protect people's lives and health through a difficult winter. END This was the graph I saw:
|
|
yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,469
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Nov 23, 2020 23:05:53 GMT
Neil OāBrien MP: JUST ONE GRAPH IN THE DAILY MAIL - a thread. The Daily Mail published this chart. 2 things about it struck me. First, Iād seen the same data from the ONS, which sadly showed excess deaths in recent weeks ā in fact higher than any time in the last 5 years. But this chart purported to show just the opposite. First, the Mail: And now the ONS data. It is back above the highest levels we have seen in recent years. Given it is a lagging indicator, it may keep rising for a bit yet. Second, the source looked very strange. Instead of just āOffice for National Statistics", the source says āStatistics Guyā. Strangeā¦ The first clue as to what is going on is that āThe Statistics Guyā turns out to be a cranky Covid-denial twitter feed, run by a guy with a cartoon avatar. He advertises things like mass demonstrations against āThe Great Resetā (a weird conspiracy theory, donāt ask). The second clue is in the small print. āAdjusted for population growthā, says the Mail. Hmmm. Given that the last ONS data for UK population is for 2019, and the 2020 number isnāt out till June 2021, clearly these arenāt official stats. What are they assuming? Cartoon avatar Statistics Guy pops up elsewhere challenging the official statistics and saying the statistics should be āAdjusted for 3.3% population growth? ā (his question marks). We can also see the original chart from Statistics Guy on his twitter (posted 13th November), which is what the Daily Mail have copied exactly. He says he has used āpopulation growth over the past 5 years to amend the upper and lower record for each weekā If we look at week 44, which he & the Mail highlight, he shows 10,887 deaths in week 44, which is what ONS have. But the highest it's been anytime in the last 5 years was 10164 in 2019. Statistics guy shows a maximum of 10,861, which appears in the Mail. That's a 6.86% increase. But of course, there is no way the population has increased by 6.8% in a year. Between 2018 and 2018 it increased 0.54%. If anything weād expect growth over the last year to be slower because of a near halt to international migration, excess deaths and so on. It is quite strange that the graph cuts off there. The next week of data had come out on the 17th, and the Mail published on the 20th. But oddly, they chose not to publish the next week of data, which showed excess deaths rising to over 200 a day above the 5 year average. Odd. Why am I going on about one wrong graph? Because actually it's not just one graph: in fact the papers are filled with a torrent of this kind of thing: āHey, thereās no real coronavirus problem, we can call just get back to normalā. Sadly, it's just not true. Why am I going on about one wrong graph? Because actually it's not just one graph: in fact the papers are filled with a torrent of this kind of thing: āHey, thereās no real coronavirus problem, we can call just get back to normalā. Sadly, it's just not true. The vaccine is coming soon, life will get back to normal. But in the meantime, we need to protect people's lives and health through a difficult winter. END This was the graph I saw: Yes and those graphs were the one the MP dispelled as nonsense. Sorry Iām no good at links so had to copy and text the words.... couldnāt add the graphs etc . Anyway.... Iāve wasted enough time on this . Believe what ever nonsense you like , I doubt rational & fact base arguments will hit home with you Pirate .
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Nov 23, 2020 23:06:17 GMT
Neil OāBrien MP: JUST ONE GRAPH IN THE DAILY MAIL - a thread. The Daily Mail published this chart. 2 things about it struck me. First, Iād seen the same data from the ONS, which sadly showed excess deaths in recent weeks ā in fact higher than any time in the last 5 years. But this chart purported to show just the opposite. First, the Mail: And now the ONS data. It is back above the highest levels we have seen in recent years. Given it is a lagging indicator, it may keep rising for a bit yet. Second, the source looked very strange. Instead of just āOffice for National Statistics", the source says āStatistics Guyā. Strangeā¦ The first clue as to what is going on is that āThe Statistics Guyā turns out to be a cranky Covid-denial twitter feed, run by a guy with a cartoon avatar. He advertises things like mass demonstrations against āThe Great Resetā (a weird conspiracy theory, donāt ask). The second clue is in the small print. āAdjusted for population growthā, says the Mail. Hmmm. Given that the last ONS data for UK population is for 2019, and the 2020 number isnāt out till June 2021, clearly these arenāt official stats. What are they assuming? Cartoon avatar Statistics Guy pops up elsewhere challenging the official statistics and saying the statistics should be āAdjusted for 3.3% population growth? ā (his question marks). We can also see the original chart from Statistics Guy on his twitter (posted 13th November), which is what the Daily Mail have copied exactly. He says he has used āpopulation growth over the past 5 years to amend the upper and lower record for each weekā If we look at week 44, which he & the Mail highlight, he shows 10,887 deaths in week 44, which is what ONS have. But the highest it's been anytime in the last 5 years was 10164 in 2019. Statistics guy shows a maximum of 10,861, which appears in the Mail. That's a 6.86% increase. But of course, there is no way the population has increased by 6.8% in a year. Between 2018 and 2018 it increased 0.54%. If anything weād expect growth over the last year to be slower because of a near halt to international migration, excess deaths and so on. It is quite strange that the graph cuts off there. The next week of data had come out on the 17th, and the Mail published on the 20th. But oddly, they chose not to publish the next week of data, which showed excess deaths rising to over 200 a day above the 5 year average. Odd. Why am I going on about one wrong graph? Because actually it's not just one graph: in fact the papers are filled with a torrent of this kind of thing: āHey, thereās no real coronavirus problem, we can call just get back to normalā. Sadly, it's just not true. Why am I going on about one wrong graph? Because actually it's not just one graph: in fact the papers are filled with a torrent of this kind of thing: āHey, thereās no real coronavirus problem, we can call just get back to normalā. Sadly, it's just not true. The vaccine is coming soon, life will get back to normal. But in the meantime, we need to protect people's lives and health through a difficult winter. END This was the graph I saw: Well as you are quoting what you say is from ONS, here is the copy paste from the ACTUAL ONS. Note the final point - what do you think happens next? 1.Main points The number of deaths registered in England and Wales in the week ending 6 November 2020 (Week 45) was 11,812; this was 925 more deaths than in Week 44. In Week 45, the number of deaths registered was 14.3% above the five-year average (1,481 deaths higher). Of the deaths registered in Week 45, 1,937 mentioned "novel coronavirus (COVID-19)", accounting for 16.4% of all deaths in England and Wales; this is an increase of 558 deaths compared with Week 44 (when there were 1,379 deaths involving COVID-19, accounting for 12.7% of all deaths). Of the 1,937 deaths that involved COVID-19, 1,743 had this recorded as the underlying cause of death (90.0%); of the 2,267 deaths that involved Influenza and Pneumonia, 307 had this recorded as the underlying cause of death (13.5%). The number of deaths in hospitals was above the five-year average in Week 45 for the third consecutive week (520 more deaths); the number of deaths in private homes and care homes was also above the five-year average (997 and 38 more deaths respectively), but deaths in other locations were below the five-year average (76 fewer deaths). In England, the total number of deaths increased from 10,166 (Week 44) to 10,962 (Week 45); all English regions had higher or the same overall deaths as the five-year average. Overall, there were 1,771 deaths involving COVID-19 in England in Week 45; the number of deaths involving COVID-19 increased in all of the English regions, with the North West having the largest number (568 deaths). In Wales, the number of deaths involving COVID-19 increased from 121 deaths (Week 44) to 166 deaths (Week 45), while the total number of deaths in Week 45 was 207 deaths higher than the five-year average. Based on a statistical model that allows for the time taken for deaths to be registered, we estimate that the number of deaths actually occurring (rather than registered) in Week 45 in England and Wales was between 10,912 and 13,671.
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 19,461
|
Post by pirate on Nov 23, 2020 23:06:59 GMT
This was the graph I saw: Yes and those graphs were the one the MP dispelled as nonsense. Sorry Iām no good at links so had to copy and text the words.... couldnāt add the graphs etc . Anyway.... Iāve wasted enough time on this . Believe what ever nonsense you like , I doubt rational & fact base arguments will hit home with you Pirate . The ONS data is nonsense?
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Nov 23, 2020 23:08:09 GMT
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 19,461
|
Post by pirate on Nov 23, 2020 23:18:33 GMT
So the numbers about average for this time of year then.
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 19,461
|
Post by pirate on Nov 23, 2020 23:22:10 GMT
Fraser Nelson reporting in The Telegraph
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Nov 23, 2020 23:44:27 GMT
|
|