Player Ratings: Hull City vs Bristol Rovers (RESULTS)

Day 6
Williams 5
Leahy 4
Ehmer 4
Kilgour 4
Harries 3
Westbrooke 6
Rodman 5.5
Grant 5.5
Nicholson 5.5
Hanlan 4

Upson 5
Ayunga 6.5 MOM
Walker 6
Baldwin 5
Daly 5

Ref 4
Hull 6

We look devoid of ideas! And as we have all season poor defensively!

Day Not a lot to do, but what there was he was no where near 6

Ehmer Seemed to be doing ok but isn't the inspiring captain we were hoping for. 6
Kilgour Battling performance but what was he doing on the second goal, had to either win it or leave it to Harries did neither....2-0 6
Harries OK 6

Williams Goes forward but never delivers a telling cross, maybe time to give Hare a chance 6
Rodman Ball bounced off him too much never likely to trouble in attack, maybe suited to the division below. 6
Grant going off changed the game 7
Leahy This was all the stuff to dislike, poor poor defender, painfully slow at taking throw ins, cumbersome in attack not good enough and 100% at fault for first goal 4

Westbrooke Worked really hard and covered more ground closing down than anyone but lacked players who can control the ball 7.5 MotM
Hanlan Needs to be dropped just is not cutting it 4
Nicholson Another display with glimpses of skill but little end product 6

Subs: Upson typical steady game, but we didn't need steady 6
Ayunga Must start ahead of Hanlon on tuesday at least offers a threat. 6
Daly NOLE
Walker NOLE but worth another start
Baldwin started on the bench for a reason

Ref cant complain 7
Hull A good team who didn't need to get out of second gear 7

Day 6

Ehmer 5.5
Kilgour 5
Harries 6

Williams 6
Rodman 7
Grant 6.5
Leahy 5

Westbrooke 5
Hanlan 4
Nicholson 6

Subs: Upson 5
Ayunga 7
Daly 4
Walker 6.5
Baldwin 5

Ref 5
Hull 7

Day.6

Ehmer4.5
Kilgour3-Gone backwards and always prone to a major gaffe
Harries.4.0. Doesn't look like a footballer and is so slow.

Williams5.5
Rodman6
Grant.NOLE
Leahy4

Westbrooke5
Hanlan 2
Nicholson5.5

Subs: Upson 2
Ayunga7.5
Daly5.5
Walker6
Baldwin5.5

Ref 6
Hull7

Day 6 one nice block and competent game.

Ehmer 5 hmmmm...
Kilgour 6 some blocking but looked uncomfortable first half.
Harries 5 made mistakes.

Williams 3 poor, thought no marking 2nd was down to his position.
Rodman 5 didn't impose himself apart from one chance to set up Hanlan.
Grant 6.5 got back quite well, hope injury not bad.
Leahy 2 awful match and his mistakes exposed both goals.

Westbrooke 4 don't get it....apart from set play, one pass to Ayunga appears to go missing all match.
Hanlan 4 not much to offer.
Nicholson 3 very off form last few matches.

Subs: Upson 4 not sure it was improvement.
Ayunga 7 m o m (why not?) definitely a physical up front presence and got a nice turn shot in.
Daly 3 offered nothing.
Walker 3 offered nothing.
Baldwin 3 offered nothing.

Ref 4 poor, totally taken in by anyone falling to the floor unless it was Hanlan.
Hull 6 professional performance against a poor team....we made them look better than they were by our mistakes. Their number 2 m o m...... and they'll be in Championship next season.

Day 6

Ehmer 4
Kilgour 4
Harries 4

Williams 5
Rodman 5
Grant 5
Leahy 5

Westbrooke 5
Hanlan 4
Nicholson 5

Subs: Upson 5
Ayunga 6
Daly 4
Walker 5
Baldwin 5

Ref 5
Hull 6

i dont think it helps to give points to players performances
would anyone here wish to be judged on their performance in their job
football is a game based on results. it doesn't take a fool to recoqnise this
but dont you think it is in a way a down side on our players
give me your thoughts on this but i wont be any different
we are at a bad point in our season,we dont need to give players points
if we do we all give them 10 out of 10 !
i think whoever started this points system was never at eastville
we know we a not perfect but we try!

Day 5
Ehmer 4
Kilgour 5
Harries 5
Williams 6
Rodman 6
Grant 4
Leahy 3
Westbrooke 3
Hanlan 5
Nicholson 5

Upson 6
Ayunga 6
Daly 4
Walker 5
Baldwin 6

Ref 5
Hull 6