|
Post by stabell on May 10, 2021 21:37:56 GMT
Hope this is okay to post - I'm looking for straight men to take part in research and thought you all might be able to help. I'm looking for straight adult men who want to take part in a two-part study examining men's attitudes towards transgender people. Responses are anonymous, each of the two sessions will only take about 10 minutes, and you'll go into the draw to win one of 2 x £10 Amazon vouchers. If you're interested, follow the link below to find out more and participate. Thanks uwe.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bBJW7Al6OouYgdw
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on May 11, 2021 5:13:00 GMT
Hope this is okay to post - I'm looking for straight men to take part in research and thought you all might be able to help. I'm looking for straight adult men who want to take part in a two-part study examining men's attitudes towards transgender people. Responses are anonymous, each of the two sessions will only take about 10 minutes, and you'll go into the draw to win one of 2 x £10 Amazon vouchers. If you're interested, follow the link below to find out more and participate. Thanks uwe.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bBJW7Al6OouYgdwDone. Felt some of the questions were a little unfair with no opportunity to explain or expand. One example of which was asking if men and women are genetically different. They are, that's why hormone therapy is used to support Trans people so why even ask the question? I dont understand what difference that makes to someone's attitude to trans people. I could not give a f**k what people decide to do with their lives as long at they are not causing any hurt to others. There was also a question about God but no option for "Dont believe" Athiests Lives Matter! Still, good luck with your study.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2021 8:54:13 GMT
Would be interesting results on gasheads.org
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2021 11:12:25 GMT
part 2 of this survey was just emailed out it seems.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on May 19, 2021 11:09:54 GMT
part 2 of this survey was just emailed out it seems. And sadly was just as bias as the first one, if not more so. I emailed the originator, who in fairness did reply but I'm not sure she really understood or accepted my feedback.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on May 19, 2021 11:33:03 GMT
part 2 of this survey was just emailed out it seems. And sadly was just as bias as the first one, if not more so. I emailed the originator, who in fairness did reply but I'm not sure she really understood or accepted my feedback. I bailed halfway through as it was just a ridiculously leading questionnaire. Low marks for methodology I think.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on May 19, 2021 11:41:02 GMT
And sadly was just as bias as the first one, if not more so. I emailed the originator, who in fairness did reply but I'm not sure she really understood or accepted my feedback. I bailed halfway through as it was just a ridiculously leading questionnaire. Low marks for methodology I think. Yeah, it was definitely leading and looked like they had already made up their minds. No options for neutrality again, and poorly worded questions that left the only sensible answer one that you know will be counted as a negative attitude.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2021 11:43:13 GMT
Yeah some trickily worded questions, still interesting though and good luck to them on their studies.
Still sad that people are categorised by their gender/sexuality imo.
|
|
|
Post by baggins on May 19, 2021 11:59:38 GMT
Yeah some trickily worded questions, still interesting though and good luck to them on their studies. Still sad that people are categorised by their gender/sexuality imo. You've either got a penis or you haven't. The rest is just window dressing.
|
|