|
Post by LJG on Aug 17, 2021 22:26:29 GMT
The lady on FB who emailed TG on Sunday, and later spoke to him on the phone, has now contacted the SC to call an EGM. She has the names of 50 members who support this request, I’ve no idea if the meets the requirements. At least the are people trying to be proactive and positive about improving things. Since when have the SC committee cared whether what they do is in accordance with their own constitution or not?
|
|
|
Post by gashead1981 on Aug 17, 2021 22:27:57 GMT
It’s time Tom Gorringe left the club. He is out to ruin the Sc and football club. The 50/50 is the supporters club baby. It is successful. Jim Chappell should tell Gorringe where to go and hands off the 50/50 draw Are you on drugs or have you been hypnotised by Ken Masters?
|
|
|
Post by Tilly's Thighs on Aug 17, 2021 23:33:19 GMT
The lady on FB who emailed TG on Sunday, and later spoke to him on the phone, has now contacted the SC to call an EGM. She has the names of 50 members who support this request, I’ve no idea if the meets the requirements. At least the are people trying to be proactive and positive about improving things. Since when have the SC committee cared whether what they do is in accordance with their own constitution or not? Very true. But at least these days it’s easier to put things in the public domain, so that people are aware as to what has been asked.
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Aug 18, 2021 6:10:42 GMT
The lady on FB who emailed TG on Sunday, and later spoke to him on the phone, has now contacted the SC to call an EGM. She has the names of 50 members who support this request, I’ve no idea if the meets the requirements. At least the are people trying to be proactive and positive about improving things. Interesting that someone has took it upon themselves to do something so fair play. (Not a member myself) Just for the record though the Chair (Jim) of the SC can convene an EGM at any time under the SC rules, which in my view they should have done a few times, especially when 'representing' the fans when trying to do Wael as not fit and proper
|
|
|
Post by wertongas on Aug 18, 2021 13:54:51 GMT
The supporters club and probably many of it's members were at the club long before the present board. Shouldn't the football club be trying to work with the supporters club to improve how things are run in the SC if they need improving rather than bullying the SC into change. I went to the game against Stevenage the south stand was most empty I had seen it for a league match (except for lock down) there were also a fair few empty seats in the east and west stands. Fortunately a lot of supporters bought their season tickets before all the recent issues so attendances still look good.But the club needs to engage better with it's fans or some of the supporters will not return.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Aug 18, 2021 14:24:14 GMT
The supporters club and probably many of it's members were at the club long before the present board. Shouldn't the football club be trying to work with the supporters club to improve how things are run in the SC if they need improving rather than bullying the SC into change. I went to the game against Stevenage the south stand was most empty I had seen it for a league match (except for lock down) there were also a fair few empty seats in the east and west stands. Fortunately a lot of supporters bought their season tickets before all the recent issues so attendances still look good.But the club needs to engage better with it's fans or some of the supporters will not return. Haven't they tried working with the SC? They asked for an alternative Fans director if I remember correctly.
|
|
|
Post by Tilly's Thighs on Aug 18, 2021 14:24:44 GMT
The supporters club and probably many of it's members were at the club long before the present board. Shouldn't the football club be trying to work with the supporters club to improve how things are run in the SC if they need improving rather than bullying the SC into change. I went to the game against Stevenage the south stand was most empty I had seen it for a league match (except for lock down) there were also a fair few empty seats in the east and west stands. Fortunately a lot of supporters bought their season tickets before all the recent issues so attendances still look good.But the club needs to engage better with it's fans or some of the supporters will not return. Don't think I'd want to work with the SC if they'd reported me to the EFL as an unfit owner.
|
|
|
Post by LJG on Aug 18, 2021 14:30:46 GMT
The supporters club and probably many of it's members were at the club long before the present board. Shouldn't the football club be trying to work with the supporters club to improve how things are run in the SC if they need improving rather than bullying the SC into change. I went to the game against Stevenage the south stand was most empty I had seen it for a league match (except for lock down) there were also a fair few empty seats in the east and west stands. Fortunately a lot of supporters bought their season tickets before all the recent issues so attendances still look good.But the club needs to engage better with it's fans or some of the supporters will not return. Being here first doesn't mean what they're doing is right. In fact it is perfectly obvious that exactly that attitude is what makes the committee think they are entitled to carry on being as sh** as possible without change including running the SC in a manner completely contrary to the rules of their own constitution.
|
|
|
Post by seanclevedongas on Aug 18, 2021 14:33:55 GMT
The supporters club and probably many of it's members were at the club long before the present board. Shouldn't the football club be trying to work with the supporters club to improve how things are run in the SC if they need improving rather than bullying the SC into change. I went to the game against Stevenage the south stand was most empty I had seen it for a league match (except for lock down) there were also a fair few empty seats in the east and west stands. Fortunately a lot of supporters bought their season tickets before all the recent issues so attendances still look good.But the club needs to engage better with it's fans or some of the supporters will not return. Don't think I'd want to work with the SC if they'd reported me to the EFL as an unfit owner. Is that true? When did that happen and what were the reasons behind their claim? Sorry if I have been asleep and missed it
|
|
|
Post by Tilly's Thighs on Aug 18, 2021 14:46:39 GMT
Don't think I'd want to work with the SC if they'd reported me to the EFL as an unfit owner. Is that true? When did that happen and what were the reasons behind their claim? Sorry if I have been asleep and missed it It is referred to at the end of this article in the BP - I believe the complaint may have been based on a perceived "safeguarding" issue.
|
|
|
Post by seanclevedongas on Aug 18, 2021 14:53:43 GMT
Is that true? When did that happen and what were the reasons behind their claim? Sorry if I have been asleep and missed it It is referred to at the end of this article in the BP - I believe the complaint may have been based on a perceived "safeguarding" issue. thank you
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Aug 18, 2021 15:04:44 GMT
Is that true? When did that happen and what were the reasons behind their claim? Sorry if I have been asleep and missed it It is referred to at the end of this article in the BP - I believe the complaint may have been based on a perceived "safeguarding" issue. morons.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Aug 18, 2021 15:53:50 GMT
Is that true? When did that happen and what were the reasons behind their claim? Sorry if I have been asleep and missed it It is referred to at the end of this article in the BP - I believe the complaint may have been based on a perceived "safeguarding" issue. perceived or made up?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2021 15:58:54 GMT
Is that true? When did that happen and what were the reasons behind their claim? Sorry if I have been asleep and missed it It is referred to at the end of this article in the BP - I believe the complaint may have been based on a perceived "safeguarding" issue. I believe that certain people made two complaints, one for being an improper owner and one for an alleged safeguarding incident. The latter is pretty vile and disgusting and was orchestrated by a waffle man.
|
|
|
Post by Tilly's Thighs on Aug 18, 2021 16:12:58 GMT
It is referred to at the end of this article in the BP - I believe the complaint may have been based on a perceived "safeguarding" issue. perceived or made up? My understanding is that it was a minor incident, which did not put a child at risk in any way, so the majority of people would not have bracketed it under "safeguarding". It was dealt with correctly by the appropriate people at the club.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Aug 18, 2021 16:18:59 GMT
My understanding is that it was a minor incident, which did not put a child at risk in any way, so the majority of people would not have bracketed it under "safeguarding". It was dealt with correctly by the appropriate people at the club. Interesting. I was under the impression that it was basically made up bollocks.
|
|
|
Post by gashead1981 on Aug 18, 2021 16:39:48 GMT
My understanding is that it was a minor incident, which did not put a child at risk in any way, so the majority of people would not have bracketed it under "safeguarding". It was dealt with correctly by the appropriate people at the club. Interesting. I was under the impression that it was basically made up bollocks. It was half and half. A very well intentioned goodwill gesture was seized upon by Steve Hamer, Jim Chappell and Ken Masters who used the Chair of the WSM SC in name to report the incident of safeguarding and grooming of a child to the FA, EFL, Council and Police as well as trying to sell the story to the press. All the authourities found no evidence of anything wrong and even the newspaper, which is known for a good sleaze story, thought it was a bit far fetched to go into print so didnt bother.
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Aug 18, 2021 16:49:34 GMT
Interesting. I was under the impression that it was basically made up bollocks. It was half and half. A very well intentioned goodwill gesture was seized upon by Steve Hamer, Jim Chappell and Ken Masters who used the Chair of the WSM SC in name to report the incident of safeguarding and grooming of a child to the FA, EFL, Council and Police as well as trying to sell the story to the press. All the authourities found no evidence of anything wrong and even the newspaper, which is known for a good sleaze story, thought it was a bit far fetched to go into print so didnt bother. Christ I was totally unaware of this ,I wonder what levels so called supporters of our Club will stoop to drag our name through the dirt,I just don't get it.
|
|
|
Post by gashead1981 on Aug 18, 2021 16:54:14 GMT
It was half and half. A very well intentioned goodwill gesture was seized upon by Steve Hamer, Jim Chappell and Ken Masters who used the Chair of the WSM SC in name to report the incident of safeguarding and grooming of a child to the FA, EFL, Council and Police as well as trying to sell the story to the press. All the authourities found no evidence of anything wrong and even the newspaper, which is known for a good sleaze story, thought it was a bit far fetched to go into print so didnt bother. Christ I was totally unaware of this ,I wonder what levels so called supporters of our Club will stoop to drag our name through the dirt,I just don't get it. It would appear that nothing is off the table, such is the desperation.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Aug 18, 2021 17:00:49 GMT
It was half and half. A very well intentioned goodwill gesture was seized upon by Steve Hamer, Jim Chappell and Ken Masters who used the Chair of the WSM SC in name to report the incident of safeguarding and grooming of a child to the FA, EFL, Council and Police as well as trying to sell the story to the press. All the authourities found no evidence of anything wrong and even the newspaper, which is known for a good sleaze story, thought it was a bit far fetched to go into print so didnt bother. Christ I was totally unaware of this ,I wonder what levels so called supporters of our Club will stoop to drag our name through the dirt,I just don't get it. And yet very good people are blocked from standing for SC positions so you can't even remove people by a fair voting process if there are no viable alternative candidates.
|
|