|
|
Post by phillistine on Jul 13, 2023 10:23:15 GMT
Lets face it this appointment is problematic and was not thought through very well. As interim manager , she will make no appointments, inherit her back up team and if as seems likely FGR inevitably continue on a downward spiral then the interim manager will be dismissed and that will attract more negative publicity for FGR than the appointment attracted positive
|
|
|
|
Post by gulfofaden on Jul 13, 2023 11:12:32 GMT
Actually, no. When both sexes were raised with androgynous expectations the choice was more pronounced, not less. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aas9899Looks like you’re been reading activism rather than scientific analysis! By that isn't what the outcome of that study says though! It says there were larger differences. But they were not split in the same way. So yes there were differences but they were NOT split in the traditional way you have outlined (that males do more dangerous things and women like more sociatal things). Even your own evidence doesn't support what you're saying. No it doesn’t. Good try. It’s got it’s own Wikipedia page en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-equality_paradox |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2023 11:18:16 GMT
By that isn't what the outcome of that study says though! It says there were larger differences. But they were not split in the same way. So yes there were differences but they were NOT split in the traditional way you have outlined (that males do more dangerous things and women like more sociatal things). Even your own evidence doesn't support what you're saying. No it doesn’t. Good try. It’s got it’s own Wikipedia page en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-equality_paradoxThat doesn't support what you are saying! It literally says: Girls performed similarly or better than boys in two out of every three countries, and were more capable of STEM tertiary education in nearly all countries examined. That is not borne out in society. You're talking nonsense. |
|
|
|
Post by BelieveItWhenIAmSatInIt on Jul 13, 2023 11:22:55 GMT
Well there are some pretty archaic points of view being thrown around... Sure you can see them too?
|
|
|
|
Post by gulfofaden on Jul 13, 2023 12:00:56 GMT
That doesn't support what you are saying! It literally says: Girls performed similarly or better than boys in two out of every three countries, and were more capable of STEM tertiary education in nearly all countries examined. That is not borne out in society. You're talking nonsense. Just to add the other bullet points which weren’t cherry picked out: Science or mathematics is much more likely to be a personal academic strength for boys than for girls More girls entered STEM degrees than graduated. The difference between both the performance of girls in PISA was inversely related to the country's GGGI. This gap was found to be correlated with the STEM graduation gap, showing that there is a similar gap between the number of girls and boys that enter STEM university programmes compared to those that complete their degrees in more gender-equal countries. Which shows the original point. The greater the degree of gender equality, the greater the preponderance for differences. Which flys in the face of the academic humanities toilet paper you’ve been educated with. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2023 12:50:15 GMT
That doesn't support what you are saying! It literally says: Girls performed similarly or better than boys in two out of every three countries, and were more capable of STEM tertiary education in nearly all countries examined. That is not borne out in society. You're talking nonsense. Just to add the other bullet points which weren’t cherry picked out: Science or mathematics is much more likely to be a personal academic strength for boys than for girls More girls entered STEM degrees than graduated. The difference between both the performance of girls in PISA was inversely related to the country's GGGI. This gap was found to be correlated with the STEM graduation gap, showing that there is a similar gap between the number of girls and boys that enter STEM university programmes compared to those that complete their degrees in more gender-equal countries. Which shows the original point. The greater the degree of gender equality, the greater the preponderance for differences. Which flys in the face of the academic humanities toilet paper you’ve been educated with. Your first bullet isn't really supporting your argument either. Male and female maths qualifications are pretty close here. Girls are actually slightly higher performing so if anything supports my argument! Your second point is utter nonsense. How could more graduate degrees than enter them? The last bullet does not support your argument or mine. It clearly states similar for both sides of the study. All in all this study simply does not show what you are claiming it does!? Also, you know absolutely nothing about me so perhaps try and stay away from personal insults, about how I have or have not been educated, eh? |
|
|
|
Post by gulfofaden on Jul 13, 2023 13:56:53 GMT
Just to add the other bullet points which weren’t cherry picked out: Science or mathematics is much more likely to be a personal academic strength for boys than for girls More girls entered STEM degrees than graduated. The difference between both the performance of girls in PISA was inversely related to the country's GGGI. This gap was found to be correlated with the STEM graduation gap, showing that there is a similar gap between the number of girls and boys that enter STEM university programmes compared to those that complete their degrees in more gender-equal countries. Which shows the original point. The greater the degree of gender equality, the greater the preponderance for differences. Which flys in the face of the academic humanities toilet paper you’ve been educated with. Your first bullet isn't really supporting your argument either. Male and female maths qualifications are pretty close here. Girls are actually slightly higher performing so if anything supports my argument! Your second point is utter nonsense. How could more graduate degrees than enter them? The last bullet does not support your argument or mine. It clearly states similar for both sides of the study. All in all this study simply does not show what you are claiming it does!? Also, you know absolutely nothing about me so perhaps try and stay away from personal insults, about how I have or have not been educated, eh? The second point is direct from Wikipedia 🤣. Perhaps you could contact the publisher scientists to argue their peer reviewed studies on the basis of your anecdotal experience. In fact everything is direct from Wikipedia, a page about the conclusions of peer reviewed scientists, excluding the last and first sentences but you’ve argued against it with real authority 🤣🤣, and the lemmings have liked it, even better. I don’t think you’ve fully understood any of it, given the questions you’re asking, but I’ll concede, you seem to think you have all the answers so for both of our own sanity and valuable time I’ll let you have this one, like you let a ten year old kid win at monopoly. well done! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2023 14:02:52 GMT
I absolutely have understood it. The study you are using does not show what you are claiming it does. It just doesn't.
Thank you and for what it's worth I think any readers of this will come to their own conclusions which one of us has acted "like a ten year old" if anyone has.
|
|
|
|
Post by oldie on Jul 13, 2023 15:37:13 GMT
Not intentionally, just intrigued to know what would be the issue. For all anyone knows, there may well be trans players in our league and elsewhere. I agree with you. |
|
|
|
Post by oldie on Jul 13, 2023 16:29:28 GMT
I absolutely have understood it. The study you are using does not show what you are claiming it does. It just doesn't. Thank you and for what it's worth I think any readers of this will come to their own conclusions which one of us has acted "like a ten year old" if anyone has. Strangely, or not in reality, I have wondered for a while about GoA's age. Or perhaps maturity. Personally I get the urge to treat him with kid gloves, not wishing to harm or expose him. Good on you Always for keeping your cool and demonstrating the opposite of what I suspect about GoA. |
|
