|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Jan 4, 2024 19:00:55 GMT
The following are the player ratings given by members of this forum for the last 22 games.
PLAYER APPEARANCES AVERAGE RATING
COX 20 6.0
WARD J 1 7.1
GIBBONS 5 4.9
WILSON 11 6.7
GRANT 16 5.0
THOMAS 16 6.6
FINLEY 17 5.8
EVANS 20 6.5
VALE 11 6.4
BROWN 15 5.3
COLLINS 21 5.5
MARQUIS 17 5.7
SINCLAIR 2 3.8
WOODS 11 5.9
MARTIN 16 5.9
CRAMA 14 5.9
HUNT 10 6.5
FRIEND 1 6.2
WARD G 10 5.5
GORDON 2 5.1
BOGARDE 12 4.8
HOOLE 6 6.3
TAYLOR 18 6.8
Excluding Jed Ward who scored 7.1 on his only appearance, Connor Taylor has been our top player on 6.8, closely followed by James Wilson on 6.7, Luke Thomas on 6.6 and Antony Evans and Jack Hunt both on 6.5.
Ourlowest scorers were Scott Sinclair on 3.8, Lamare Bogarde on 4.8 and James Gibbons on 4.9.
|
|
|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Jan 4, 2024 19:34:17 GMT
Could I point out that appearances are only counted
if a player who is a substitute comes on no later than the 80th minute and any ratings given by posters for substitutes who come on later than that time are ignored for want of a better word.
I point this out as the likes of Scott Sinclair although coming on in games in the last 22 games has only accumulated a couple of appearances as he has been coming on after the 80th minute on several occasions.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sir Trevor B'Sol on Jan 4, 2024 19:37:01 GMT
Thanks for completing this.
Many of the ratings are spot on.
Most supporters would strongly support the ratings of LT, AE and JH.
The data also highlights the way in which a self-selected population cohort is inherently problematic.
This is especially the case when the sample size is restricted and time-constrained.
In all teams the role of certain players will be only partially appreciated by supporters.
For example, GW and CM have been the most influential players this season.
Their ratings are lower than they deserve. It does not matter.
Your work is really valuable, focuses minds and provokes helpful discussion.
|
|
|
|
Post by bathtubpirate on Jan 4, 2024 19:37:41 GMT
I'm surprised Woods is rated better than Bogarde.
|
|
|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Jan 4, 2024 19:42:13 GMT
I'm surprised Woods is rated better than Bogarde. Woods scored quite well on his earlier appearances but has gone downhill rapidly recently. Bogarde has been more stable in his performances but never scoring very high ratings. |
|
|
|
Post by wilkimania on Jan 4, 2024 21:47:35 GMT
I'm surprised Woods is rated better than Bogarde. There were people on here calling him our player of the season before Oxford away. |
|
|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Jan 5, 2024 10:37:53 GMT
Bump!
|
|
|
|
Post by lastminutewinner on Jan 5, 2024 11:33:21 GMT
I'm surprised Woods is rated better than Bogarde. There were people on here calling him our player of the season before Oxford away. He did look the business against Lincoln and Port Vale. Just hasnt show anywhere near that standard since. The change has been shocking |
|
|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Jan 5, 2024 11:47:47 GMT
There were people on here calling him our player of the season before Oxford away. He did look the business against Lincoln and Port Vale. Just hasnt show anywhere near that standard since. The change has been shocking You’re right about that. The Lincoln game was before I took on the ratings thread but he scored 7.9 against Port Vale and it’s been downhill since then. |
|
