|
|
Post by wakeygas on Jul 7, 2014 16:34:06 GMT
link
Steve Yates s is referred to in the article as "erstwhile defensive coach" but I thought he had only just been upgraded from kitman. 
|
|
|
|
Post by fanboy on Jul 7, 2014 16:38:18 GMT
Wow, what are the chances of that typo.... Must admit I had to look up the definition.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2014 16:40:45 GMT
Wow, what are the chances of that typo.... Must admit I had to look up the definition. Phew not just me then |
|
|
|
Post by Quartermaster on Jul 7, 2014 16:42:08 GMT
Wow, what are the chances of that typo.... Must admit I had to look up the definition. Me too actually! A word you hear but I wasn't 100% sure of it's meaning. What chance it originated from someone equally unsure? Probably not I guess as all OS articles are written by professionals and then proof-read at least twice...... |
|
|
|
Post by 2nd May 1990 on Jul 7, 2014 17:01:30 GMT
The wording is very specific - "kitman and erstwhile defensive coach", which suggests (as does the picture) that he is clearly still at the club, but defensive coach no longer. He looks in pretty good shape, to be fair.
|
|
|
|
Post by 2nd May 1990 on Jul 7, 2014 17:03:27 GMT
Ah, my mistake - I was looking at Mildenhall, not Yates, who you can't really see much of!
|
|
|
|
Post by RD on Jul 7, 2014 17:08:31 GMT
Ah, my mistake - I was looking at Mildenhall, not Yates, who you can't really see much of! So Mildenhall is only in "pretty good shape" then  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2014 17:12:50 GMT
From the very little I have heard it seems more staff lost their jobs as a result of meetings last week. I have not had any detail on that and my guess is that, if true, it will be announced when there is a player coming in to offset it.
I can't imagine Yatesy would have been culled so soon though, could he ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Dave on Jul 7, 2014 21:52:27 GMT
Love the fact they seem to have corrected the article and come up with this...
|
|
|
|
Post by hanham on Jul 8, 2014 6:59:42 GMT
Love the fact they seem to have corrected the article and come up with this... Who says they don't read the forums............. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2014 7:01:59 GMT
The mistake was made by Keith Brookman, he picked it up via a couple of postings on the Gas List.
Sounds like Kirsty is on her hols, and he is standing in.
|
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Jul 8, 2014 7:04:11 GMT
The mistake was made by Keith Brookman, he picked it up via a couple of postings on the Gas List. Sounds like Kirsty is on her hols, and he is standing in. Ah wondered why the spelling got better ! |
|
|
|
Post by wreckless on Jul 8, 2014 16:29:56 GMT
Maybe they meant "erstwhile kit man and defensive coach" - so it was as kit man that he was erstwhile.
They perhaps could have made it clear that as the defence coach he is subsistential or quidditative!
|
|
