|
|
Post by Cantankerous Gas on Aug 7, 2015 10:07:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by TopperJR on Aug 7, 2015 10:09:22 GMT
That'll be good experience for him.....If he does well there it could mean a sniff of the first team for us by Christmas.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gas-Ed on Aug 7, 2015 10:16:38 GMT
Surprised that they have been able to get Connor Clifford. He was highly rated not long ago. With Easter, Ellis, Matty and Nate ahead of Lucas, it seems a good call to get him out there playing, although I think he could do a job for us now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rod1883 on Aug 7, 2015 10:18:47 GMT
Surprised that they have been able to get Connor Clifford. He was highly rated not long ago. With Easter, Ellis, Matty and Nate ahead of Lucas, it seems a good call to get him out there playing, although I think he could do a job for us now. Was about to say the same about Clifford. I'm surprised he hasn't been picked up by someone bigger - even by us as we were after him last season? |
|
|
|
Post by 2nd May 1990 on Aug 7, 2015 10:19:23 GMT
Hmmm, I thought Connor Clifford was meant to be the real deal. So, after all that, Barnet didn't want him and he couldn't find another league club.
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Aug 7, 2015 10:26:55 GMT
Hmmm, I thought Connor Clifford was meant to be the real deal. So, after all that, Barnet didn't want him and he couldn't find another league club. Perhaps they are prepared to pay more than a league club, we know from FGR & Eastleigh last season there's some big payers in non league, didn't Woodards also join the Wood? |
|
|
|
Post by Gas-Ed on Aug 7, 2015 10:45:12 GMT
Hmmm, I thought Connor Clifford was meant to be the real deal. So, after all that, Barnet didn't want him and he couldn't find another league club. I wonder if he regrets signing for Barnet instead of us. |
|
|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on Aug 7, 2015 10:52:46 GMT
Hmmm, I thought Connor Clifford was meant to be the real deal. So, after all that, Barnet didn't want him and he couldn't find another league club. I wonder if he regrets signing for Barnet instead of us. Thought he signed for them for promotion? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2015 11:44:19 GMT
Bit dissapointed with this news. I thought he had the potential to break into the first team this season.
|
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Aug 7, 2015 11:46:23 GMT
Bit dissapointed with this news. I thought he had the potential to break into the first team this season. Doubtful considering our current lineup so put him out for some experience. |
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Aug 7, 2015 11:47:51 GMT
Bit dissapointed with this news. I thought he had the potential to break into the first team this season. Disagree, I think it is good for all parties. It's only a one month loan anyway! If he does that well then we could put him back in our squad after the month. He's still only 19 remember. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2015 11:47:54 GMT
Bit dissapointed with this news. I thought he had the potential to break into the first team this season. Doubtful considering our current lineup so put him out for some experience. I'd be delighted if that turns out to be the case but none of our strikers are prolific. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2015 11:49:03 GMT
Bit dissapointed with this news. I thought he had the potential to break into the first team this season. Disagree, I think it is good for all parties. It's only a one month loan anyway! If he does that well then we could put him back in our squad after the month. He's still only 19 remember. That's alright then! I had it in my head it was a season long loan for some reason. |
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Aug 7, 2015 11:57:25 GMT
Doubtful considering our current lineup so put him out for some experience. I'd be delighted if that turns out to be the case but none of our strikers are prolific. Give it time. |
|
|
|
Post by 2nd May 1990 on Aug 7, 2015 12:56:33 GMT
Doubtful considering our current lineup so put him out for some experience. I'd be delighted if that turns out to be the case but none of our strikers are prolific. I know it was the conference but it's surely a bit harsh to say Ellis wasn't prolific last year. 17 goals and he only started about 10 games in all competitions. |
|
|
|
Post by pirate49 on Aug 7, 2015 13:15:43 GMT
That'll be good experience for him.....If he does well there it could mean a sniff of the first team for us by Christmas. Did well enough @ WSM! With seven on the bench I'd have liked him around the squad this season. |
|
|
|
Post by TopperJR on Aug 7, 2015 14:09:04 GMT
That'll be good experience for him.....If he does well there it could mean a sniff of the first team for us by Christmas. Did well enough @ WSM! With seven on the bench I'd have liked him around the squad this season. I agree in principal, but stepping up to conference national level and getting some solid games under his belt at a level higher than WSM is probably better for his development and thus for us in the long run than rotting on the bench as our 5th choice striker. |
|
|
|
Post by richardstad on Aug 8, 2015 21:05:44 GMT
BW manager today:
"Jamie Lucas worked his socks off today after bringing him in from Bristol Rovers yesterday morning scored a great goal"
He won MoM as well
He looked impressive in pre-season disappointing he's gone on loan
|
|
|
|
Post by Centenary Gas on Aug 8, 2015 21:07:37 GMT
BW manager today: "Jamie Lucas worked his socks off today after bringing him in from Bristol Rovers yesterday morning scored a great goal" He won MoM as well He looked impressive in pre-season disappointing he's gone on loan It's only for a month, isn't it? We can see how he gets on in a league we know about, and if he scores a few bring him back. |
|
|
|
Post by Rod1883 on Aug 10, 2015 13:15:58 GMT
|
|
