|
Post by lpgas on Jan 19, 2016 17:39:53 GMT
Come on don't let this thread drop on to page 2
|
|
|
Post by chippenhamgas on Jan 19, 2016 18:24:35 GMT
I think it may pick up next week!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2016 18:45:05 GMT
The sh1t have just announced a loss of 9.9 million for the last year.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2016 14:38:53 GMT
Subject had just slipped to page 2. Not having any of that old mullarkey.
Is today the day?. Sensible answers only please.
|
|
|
Post by Parrot on Jan 20, 2016 14:41:55 GMT
Subject had just slipped to page 2. Not having any of that old mullarkey. Is today the day?. Sensible answers only please. Nope, Im busy today
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2016 14:50:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by orgasmic on Jan 21, 2016 7:12:28 GMT
Does anyone have a legit update on the consortium?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2016 7:19:27 GMT
Does anyone have a legit update on the consortium? There hasn't been a single legit piece of information on the mythical 'consortium' since day one !
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Jan 21, 2016 8:03:26 GMT
Does anyone have a legit update on the consortium? There hasn't been a single legit piece of information on the mythical 'consortium' since day one ! But Nobby it could be today that the "syndicate" members are announced.....
|
|
|
Post by axegas on Jan 21, 2016 8:09:34 GMT
Does anyone have a legit update on the consortium? There is no "consortium"
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jan 21, 2016 8:36:09 GMT
Does anyone have a legit update on the consortium? Perhaps this thread should be locked at this point until somebody can produce some legit evidence??
|
|
|
Post by Gasshole on Jan 21, 2016 8:50:03 GMT
Does anyone have a legit update on the consortium? There is no "consortium" Aha....no consortium. Are you trying to tell us it's an individual investor. Fkin slap me.
|
|
|
Post by lpgas on Jan 21, 2016 11:24:23 GMT
I think the word consortium got mixed up with companion (Higgs has got a mate) It's not me!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2016 11:29:48 GMT
JTS has already told us that the 'consortium' that this thread was founded on have now finished any negotiations and moved on. They are no more. But still, those ITK refuse to reveal any details of that failed bid. Why, I have no idea ! Apparently, the new bid is from an individual, but we'll never ever know, will we!
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Jan 21, 2016 11:42:33 GMT
JTS has already told us that the 'consortium' that this thread was founded on have now finished any negotiations and moved on. They are no more. But still, those ITK refuse to reveal any details of that failed bid. Why, I have no idea ! Apparently, the new bid is from an individual, but we'll never ever know, will we! i would suggest the only option left is the fabled Nick Higgs Plan "B" ..... god know what that's all about
|
|
|
Post by Severncider on Jan 21, 2016 12:11:01 GMT
JTS has already told us that the 'consortium' that this thread was founded on have now finished any negotiations and moved on. They are no more. But still, those ITK refuse to reveal any details of that failed bid. Why, I have no idea ! Apparently, the new bid is from an individual, but we'll never ever know, will we! That supposes that JTS is ITK on ALL aspects of this?
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jan 21, 2016 12:16:13 GMT
JTS has already told us that the 'consortium' that this thread was founded on have now finished any negotiations and moved on. They are no more. But still, those ITK refuse to reveal any details of that failed bid. Why, I have no idea ! Apparently, the new bid is from an individual, but we'll never ever know, will we! I don't think he said that at all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2016 12:24:55 GMT
JTS has already told us that the 'consortium' that this thread was founded on have now finished any negotiations and moved on. They are no more. But still, those ITK refuse to reveal any details of that failed bid. Why, I have no idea ! Apparently, the new bid is from an individual, but we'll never ever know, will we! I don't think he said that at all. I'm pretty sure he did. Quote, ".....was i heard a deal had been done and would be announced in the next week or two, but i now know If a deal has been done it is not with the consortium i know of and would probably mean either a new investor has been found or we are going into some sort of partnership with UWE and/or another party to fund the stadium build. " Unquote. AF Forum
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jan 21, 2016 12:26:32 GMT
JTS has already told us that the 'consortium' that this thread was founded on have now finished any negotiations and moved on. They are no more. But still, those ITK refuse to reveal any details of that failed bid. Why, I have no idea ! Apparently, the new bid is from an individual, but we'll never ever know, will we! That supposes that JTS is ITK on ALL aspects of this? But wasn't it JTS' tweet that started this rumour/thread off in the first place, he also suggested last week NH had agreed a deal with another party?
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Jan 21, 2016 12:27:38 GMT
I don't think he said that at all. I'm pretty sure he did. Source.
|
|