|
|
Post by aghast on Jan 28, 2016 18:54:25 GMT
Is it to be unlocked? If not, can we have a new one, dedicated to the case only and not religion?
Could be this one, but I'm not ggmi so I don't care, so long as we have somewhere to comment on an important issue.
|
|
|
|
Post by newmarketgas on Jan 28, 2016 19:00:32 GMT
Are you crazy man ? It might be a full out and out riot this time ! People will want to be fighting one another next.  |
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jan 28, 2016 19:02:58 GMT
Yeah, this seems a good place for court case news.
Anyone know anything?
There seems literally less news about this important, public and very real event than there is about the consortium takeover!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2016 19:09:32 GMT
Could just use "A new beginning"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2016 19:13:54 GMT
Are you crazy man ? It might be a full out and out riot this time ! People will want to be fighting one another next. Are you qualified to call another person 'crazy'? If not, that's Doctorism. On top of that you advocate fightism. You should be ashamed.......a man of your age! |
|
|
|
Post by spiess1 on Jan 28, 2016 19:14:24 GMT
Is this a thread? (J-P Sartre)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2016 19:17:22 GMT
Is this a thread? (J-P Sartre) One man's thread is another man's rope. |
|
|
|
Post by You can call me Al. on Jan 28, 2016 19:22:55 GMT
I locked the Court Case thread. It was getting ridiculous. Of course we need a thread on it but if it gets stupid it will also be locked/deleted. As others have said before it really is down to users moderating themselves and acting with a little more soddin respect.
Thank you
|
|
|
|
Post by spiess1 on Jan 28, 2016 19:23:34 GMT
One can be threadbare but not ropebare (A. Camus)
|
|
|
|
Post by Thatslife on Jan 28, 2016 19:33:43 GMT
Is it to be unlocked? If not, can we have a new one, dedicated to the case only and not religion? Could be this one, but I'm not ggmi so I don't care, so long as we have somewhere to comment on an important issue.   |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2016 19:49:23 GMT
I locked the Court Case thread. It was getting ridiculous. Of course we need a thread on it but if it gets stupid it will also be locked/deleted. As others have said before it really is down to users moderating themselves and acting with a little more soddin respect. Thank you But of a double edged sword really. By locking a thread, it can prevent a natural conclusion. It ends any stupidity at that time but leaves disagreements open. I would suggest just moving those threads from the front page onto another area of gaschat? |
|
|
|
Post by oldgas on Jan 28, 2016 19:51:56 GMT
I listened to the "Having a Gas" show on the radio this evening, thinking there would be some information or steer on how the case seemed to go. There were 3 fans on the show and all Geoff did was muse about the old days and discuss the present squad, with a cameo interview with Fallon thrown in. I found it all a bit disappointing to be honest, it seemed nothing more than a way of padding out the last local hour until they hand over to the national broadcasters.
Surely the board could have put someone up to tell us a bit about how they saw the future, or is it all covered by confidentiality agreements these days?
|
|
|
|
Post by You can call me Al. on Jan 28, 2016 20:02:04 GMT
I locked the Court Case thread. It was getting ridiculous. Of course we need a thread on it but if it gets stupid it will also be locked/deleted. As others have said before it really is down to users moderating themselves and acting with a little more soddin respect. Thank you But of a double edged sword really. By locking a thread, it can prevent a natural conclusion. It ends any stupidity at that time but leaves disagreements open. I would suggest just moving those threads from the front page onto another area of gaschat?I did kind sir. But no-one took up the offer of posting their arguments in the General Chat section and after another poster continued with an inflammatory post the sillyness continued. Enjoy your evening. Lets hope a few just post with a little more dignity. |
|
|
|
Post by newmarketgas on Jan 28, 2016 20:30:10 GMT
Did anyone else get a ban ? Just wondering as things got a bit, shall we say, worse than the start of the trouble.
|
|
|
|
Post by newmarketgas on Jan 28, 2016 20:45:10 GMT
I'll take that as a no, thats good .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2016 20:46:20 GMT
Did anyone else get a ban ? Just wondering as things got a bit, shall we say, worse than the start of the trouble. Despite a personal attack, probably not. Anyway you can't please all of the people all of the time. |
|
|
|
Post by kruger on Jan 28, 2016 20:54:14 GMT
I locked the Court Case thread. It was getting ridiculous. Of course we need a thread on it but if it gets stupid it will also be locked/deleted. As others have said before it really is down to users moderating themselves and acting with a little more soddin respect. Thank you maybe you can lock the "new beginning" thread aswell. So much crap on there I have given up looking at it. |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jan 28, 2016 21:06:43 GMT
I listened to the "Having a Gas" show on the radio this evening, thinking there would be some information or steer on how the case seemed to go. There were 3 fans on the show and all Geoff did was muse about the old days and discuss the present squad, with a cameo interview with Fallon thrown in. I found it all a bit disappointing to be honest, it seemed nothing more than a way of padding out the last local hour until they hand over to the national broadcasters. Surely the board could have put someone up to tell us a bit about how they saw the future, or is it all covered by confidentiality agreements these days? It's as if there's been an almost deliberate media black out, the first report by the B Post was interesting but that only took us up to lunchtime on day 1, the reports since seem a bit half hearted, BBC's Ally Durden apparently attended but they virtually reported nothing about the case, ITV don't seem to have reported anything and nobody even attended from the forum this time ,finally, the club's own website couldn't have said less if it had tried. It's hard to believe so much was at stake as we get better reports about meaningless mid week reserve friendlies!!! |
|
|
|
Post by lulworthgas on Jan 28, 2016 21:10:04 GMT
I locked the Court Case thread. It was getting ridiculous. Of course we need a thread on it but if it gets stupid it will also be locked/deleted. As others have said before it really is down to users moderating themselves and acting with a little more soddin respect. Thank you Nothing to do with you being circumcised then lord sugar? |
|
|
|
Post by Severncider on Jan 29, 2016 0:24:43 GMT
I listened to the "Having a Gas" show on the radio this evening, thinking there would be some information or steer on how the case seemed to go. There were 3 fans on the show and all Geoff did was muse about the old days and discuss the present squad, with a cameo interview with Fallon thrown in. I found it all a bit disappointing to be honest, it seemed nothing more than a way of padding out the last local hour until they hand over to the national broadcasters. Surely the board could have put someone up to tell us a bit about how they saw the future, or is it all covered by confidentiality agreements these days? It's as if there's been an almost deliberate media black out, the first report by the B Post was interesting but that only took us up to lunchtime on day 1, the reports since seem a bit half hearted, BBC's Ally Durden apparently attended but they virtually reported nothing about the case, ITV don't seem to have reported anything and nobody even attended from the forum this time ,finally, the club's own website couldn't have said less if it had tried. It's hard to believe so much was at stake as we get better reports about meaningless mid week reserve friendlies!!! Nothing strange there.
I believe it was a waste of time but fully respect NH for trying. Why waste £150 per day in travelling costs when no-one was to be cross examined and it was just a argument about a previous Judges interpretation of the facts presented before her.
I heard those arguments at the case in May. I was not convinced, one of our own legal team was not convinced and unless a "rabbit" is pulled out of a hat, I cannot see the result changing.
Just one point. Did we try to negotiate a last minute agreement with Sainsbury? I have no idea on the answer but would not be surprised if we did.
|
|
