|
Post by pirate49 on May 10, 2016 13:11:38 GMT
Vote for Dave said Europe will be at war if we leave - so Hey Ho!! Will we all need Gasmasks??
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on May 10, 2016 14:49:36 GMT
Jeez Bags, I had another wonderful meal last night. She decided to cook me a Schnitzel, a thin strip of meat (usually Veal) coated in breadcrumbs. I was sat at the table as she cooked it, and we were chatting. Then I smelt something, and suggested that something (the schnitzel) was burning. "I know what I'm doing", she snarled at me. Next it was "Oops, how did that happen?"........she then dished up the schnitzel which was burnt black on one side. I couldn't cut it, but had to break solid chunks off.......and apparently, it was my fault for talking to her while she cooked it! An hour later I had to borrow the Mother-In-Law's dog again and take him for a walk to Burger King. So no, my kitchen is not my safe place. Disgusting treatment. Let's all vote out so that we can get nobby deported back to the uk. Will that make him a migrant ? If so that will qualify him for a free House/medical care/schooling/bongage leasons/car pass for the mem
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2016 14:53:10 GMT
I see that Cameron the Toff, you know, the man of the people who Ives in the inner city and buys his Big Issue from the Romania bloke who stands outside the Pound shop, has started telling us there could be a world war if we leave Europe. Apparently house values will also tumble. They're all lying through their teeth. Did anyone bother to read that utter crap they had posted through everyone's letter box? Unbelievable and an insult to everyone's intelligence. Vote leave we'll be much better off on our own. It's not only the so called toffs tho is it? Listen to some of the drivel from Labour,the 'people's party' and Union leaders who look after 'the working class' . No matter what way people swing,if you pardon the pun,make your own minds up. There is some serious bull being said by people with their own interests at heart. No one else's.
|
|
|
Post by lpgas on May 10, 2016 15:14:21 GMT
Vote for Dave said Europe will be at war if we leave - so Hey Ho!! Looking back in history: it's 2-0 to the Eng a land 2-0 to the Eng a land and lets face it war is one way to keep the population down
|
|
|
Post by aghast on May 10, 2016 17:41:10 GMT
I see that Cameron the Toff, you know, the man of the people who Ives in the inner city and buys his Big Issue from the Romania bloke who stands outside the Pound shop, has started telling us there could be a world war if we leave Europe. Apparently house values will also tumble. They're all lying through their teeth. Did anyone bother to read that utter crap they had posted through everyone's letter box? Unbelievable and an insult to everyone's intelligence. Vote leave we'll be much better off on our own. It's not only the so called toffs tho is it? Listen to some of the drivel from Labour,the 'people's party' and Union leaders who look after 'the working class' . No matter what way people swing,if you pardon the pun,make your own minds up. There is some serious bull being said by people with their own interests at heart. No one else's. So from what you say, it's in the interests of right wing politicians, left wing politicians, centre ground politicians, union leaders and business men that we stay in, since they all have their own interests at heart. Astonishing coalition of contradictory opposites you've put together there.
|
|
|
Post by youmadethatup on May 10, 2016 17:55:39 GMT
Fool! How did people come to the UK before the EU? A lot of the pro EU scaremongering follows the same tactic. "Our NHS couldn't survive without immigrants" How did it survive prior to 2004? I guess it was empty hospitals with no doctors, or perhaps we paid our own citizens to do it without buying in people who are cheap. "How can we negotiate trade deals?" The same way we did for 1000 years prior to membership. "How can we get talent to come here without the EU?" Simple. We make our own rules. Footballers - good. Doctors - good. Millions of cheap labour - bad. Pick and choose. 5th largest economy in world. If we pay the £ and allow them to come, then you think the fact we are not in the EU will affect that? BREXIT does not mean no immigration. That's a deception made by the in camp. M What's more likely to happen without 'cheap' staff in the NHS is the government will say it can not afford to run the NHS as it is and allow the private market to run large sections of it .....for profit....with certain care treatments being chargeable to the patient.The government are already at loggerheads with jnr doctors that are being perceived as cheap (?) The trade unions will go as will many workers rights. There are good and bad things about staying in the EU or leaving and I don't think anybody should be in one camp 100% The same arguments apply to the UK ...should the UK leave the EU I would assume the UK will finally be abandoned as many of the same arguments occur. Our Welsh and Irish and Scottish players will soon count as overseas players ...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2016 19:38:55 GMT
It's not only the so called toffs tho is it? Listen to some of the drivel from Labour,the 'people's party' and Union leaders who look after 'the working class' . No matter what way people swing,if you pardon the pun,make your own minds up. There is some serious bull being said by people with their own interests at heart. No one else's. So from what you say, it's in the interests of right wing politicians, left wing politicians, centre ground politicians, union leaders and business men that we stay in, since they all have their own interests at heart. Astonishing coalition of contradictory opposites you've put together there. I know it's not exactly surprising but some people just can't see the wood for the trees. On the whole,these people sing from the same hyme sheet as without each other they would serve no purpose!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2016 4:59:40 GMT
Fool! How did people come to the UK before the EU? A lot of the pro EU scaremongering follows the same tactic. "Our NHS couldn't survive without immigrants" How did it survive prior to 2004? I guess it was empty hospitals with no doctors, or perhaps we paid our own citizens to do it without buying in people who are cheap. "How can we negotiate trade deals?" The same way we did for 1000 years prior to membership. "How can we get talent to come here without the EU?" Simple. We make our own rules. Footballers - good. Doctors - good. Millions of cheap labour - bad. Pick and choose. 5th largest economy in world. If we pay the £ and allow them to come, then you think the fact we are not in the EU will affect that? BREXIT does not mean no immigration. That's a deception made by the in camp. M What's more likely to happen without 'cheap' staff in the NHS is the government will say it can not afford to run the NHS as it is and allow the private market to run large sections of it .....for profit....with certain care treatments being chargeable to the patient.The government are already at loggerheads with jnr doctors that are being perceived as cheap (?) The trade unions will go as will many workers rights. There are good and bad things about staying in the EU or leaving and I don't think anybody should be in one camp 100% The same arguments apply to the UK ...should the UK leave the EU I would assume the UK will finally be abandoned as many of the same arguments occur. Our Welsh and Irish and Scottish players will soon count as overseas players ... Ok - so if the NHS can't survive without the cheap staff, how did it survive BEFORE we had a stream of cheap labour? Having worked in financial services for a long while, you see everyone's salaries and earnings and I can unequivocally say that one of the most, if not the all time number one well paid profession is healthcare. The majority of GPs are a double millionaire at retirement. Consultants hit that point late thirties early forties. Junior doctors of course need to strike - they're so downtrodden with the capitalist classes laughing at them with their paltry million pound DB pension at retirement and tiny salary whilst they slave in NHS workhouses. I am not to bothered about companies making profits as there are plenty of people making vast sums of money, well above what they are worth out of the NHS. its a terribly managed organisation. The other huge drain is the fact anyone can come here and have any condition treated for free with no questions asked. I don't want to lose free at the point of delivery healthcare. But beyond that I could not care if it's the NHS or BHS. In the same way I like TV but I don't like virgin media. So no, I'm sure the NHS will survive as it always survived without Europe, as a free at delivery service. ijf we could do this in 1960,1970, 1980 why can't we do it now without millions of imported labour? We do not pay our doctors cheaply so we are not getting cheap doctors, that's for sure. £1k a shift for a German GP working here.
|
|
|
Post by youmadethatup on May 11, 2016 9:23:10 GMT
What's more likely to happen without 'cheap' staff in the NHS is the government will say it can not afford to run the NHS as it is and allow the private market to run large sections of it .....for profit....with certain care treatments being chargeable to the patient.The government are already at loggerheads with jnr doctors that are being perceived as cheap (?) The trade unions will go as will many workers rights. There are good and bad things about staying in the EU or leaving and I don't think anybody should be in one camp 100% The same arguments apply to the UK ...should the UK leave the EU I would assume the UK will finally be abandoned as many of the same arguments occur. Our Welsh and Irish and Scottish players will soon count as overseas players ... Ok - so if the NHS can't survive without the cheap staff, how did it survive BEFORE we had a stream of cheap labour? Having worked in financial services for a long while, you see everyone's salaries and earnings and I can unequivocally say that one of the most, if not the all time number one well paid profession is healthcare. The majority of GPs are a double millionaire at retirement. Consultants hit that point late thirties early forties. Junior doctors of course need to strike - they're so downtrodden with the capitalist classes laughing at them with their paltry million pound DB pension at retirement and tiny salary whilst they slave in NHS workhouses. I am not to bothered about companies making profits as there are plenty of people making vast sums of money, well above what they are worth out of the NHS. its a terribly managed organisation. The other huge drain is the fact anyone can come here and have any condition treated for free with no questions asked. I don't want to lose free at the point of delivery healthcare. But beyond that I could not care if it's the NHS or BHS. In the same way I like TV but I don't like virgin media. So no, I'm sure the NHS will survive as it always survived without Europe, as a free at delivery service. ijf we could do this in 1960,1970, 1980 why can't we do it now without millions of imported labour? We do not pay our doctors cheaply so we are not getting cheap doctors, that's for sure. £1k a shift for a German GP working here. There was a stream of people coming in from the commonwealth. Mostly India/Pakistan in the earlier years of the NHS with lots of Africans enrolling through the 90's. The point is the conservative party (and others) does not want a tax paid health service run by employees of the state ,the overall objective is to have low taxes . The EU exit will be used as an excuse to justify the sell off. Healthcare should command the best wages , it has 24hr 365 availability (in hospitals) and a massive responsibility on its employees. Why are we paying £1000 a shift...well their agency that they are signed up with will take a nice cut ,then theres the wages of those who have to engage and pay the agencies and doctor/nurse. So why is no English person saying I want to be a doctor/nurse ? If it was so lucrative and easy people would be clambering to get in ?....instead of the slow drip of nurses leaving the service to become office workers etc. Anyway this is a football thread...apologies....I respect any reply you may make but won't continue the discussion here and bore everyone ! :-)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2016 9:45:05 GMT
Health Care is very expensive no matter what country you live in. The NHS just cannot exist in it's current state. The UK cannot afford to be the health provider for anyone in the world. With the cost of heathcare now, it is pretty easy, and quite cheap, to hop on a plane anywhere in the world, fly to the UK, and get your treatment for free. The world of 1948, when the NHS was formed, is a world away from the world of 2016.
Things have to change. This is not a Labour v Tory issue, as the current Tory Government are in reality spending more on the NHS than the previous Labour Government did. You cannot just keep throwing more and more money into the NHS. It's a bottomless pit, and until the British public wake-up to the fact that the NHS desperately needs reform, then it will always be in crisis.
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on May 11, 2016 11:19:43 GMT
What's more likely to happen without 'cheap' staff in the NHS is the government will say it can not afford to run the NHS as it is and allow the private market to run large sections of it .....for profit....with certain care treatments being chargeable to the patient.The government are already at loggerheads with jnr doctors that are being perceived as cheap (?) The trade unions will go as will many workers rights. There are good and bad things about staying in the EU or leaving and I don't think anybody should be in one camp 100% The same arguments apply to the UK ...should the UK leave the EU I would assume the UK will finally be abandoned as many of the same arguments occur. Our Welsh and Irish and Scottish players will soon count as overseas players ... Ok - so if the NHS can't survive without the cheap staff, how did it survive BEFORE we had a stream of cheap labour? Having worked in financial services for a long while, you see everyone's salaries and earnings and I can unequivocally say that one of the most, if not the all time number one well paid profession is healthcare. The majority of GPs are a double millionaire at retirement. Consultants hit that point late thirties early forties. Junior doctors of course need to strike - they're so downtrodden with the capitalist classes laughing at them with their paltry million pound DB pension at retirement and tiny salary whilst they slave in NHS workhouses. I am not to bothered about companies making profits as there are plenty of people making vast sums of money, well above what they are worth out of the NHS. its a terribly managed organisation. The other huge drain is the fact anyone can come here and have any condition treated for free with no questions asked. I don't want to lose free at the point of delivery healthcare. But beyond that I could not care if it's the NHS or BHS. In the same way I like TV but I don't like virgin media. So no, I'm sure the NHS will survive as it always survived without Europe, as a free at delivery service. ijf we could do this in 1960,1970, 1980 why can't we do it now without millions of imported labour? We do not pay our doctors cheaply so we are not getting cheap doctors, that's for sure. £1k a shift for a German GP working here. I'd promised myself that I would avoid these discussions as I no longer have the time or energy to debate properly, but I need to respond to this. the cost of health care is much higher now, people live longer and drugs are saving more lives, but cost. Without either a plan to get more doctors and nurses then the NHS will struggle, both in recruitment and retention, but also in buying in expensive agency staff. i also work in the financial services sector and whilst I agree some are paid well, many are not. Also, NHS staff will have an in house pension scheme so unless you deal directly with that you will by definition only see those who have more money to buy a top up arrangement. As for GP pensions and being millionaires at retirement, the NHS pension scheme is a defined benefit scheme in that the payout is based on service and salary, talk of them having a pot of money is misleading. The government states that the rule of thumb for costing a DB scheme is a factor of 20, for example a salary of £100,000pa will theoretically cost £2m. It is not their pot of money to choose what they like, it is deferred salary. Even when the rules are eventually relaxed for these schemes there will be a large tax bill should they be cashed in. With regards to the free treatment for foreigners, I was in children's A&E recently and a Spanish lady was being told in no uncertain terms that after today she will have to pay for her daughter should any ongoing treatment be required. Finally, where do you draw the line for free treatment? My son needs ongoing care, regular medication. It is hard enough getting travel insurance, Lord knows how we would cope with health cover. And it's not just him, a friend went to her GP for something trivial. There was no reason but the GP referred her for a scan anyway. Turns out she has breast cancer and had she waited a bit longer it would be terminal. If the GP was costed, she wouldn't have gone, if the scan was costed she wouldn't have gone. After treatment, were she to have had private health cover, her premiums would increase just at the time she faces redundancy. My father in law had a heart bypass done privately, when it caused complications, they didn't want to know and he ended up back in the NHS. Private health cover is fine, until something goes wrong.
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on May 11, 2016 11:49:29 GMT
Apologies if my last post was a little curt, I find out later today if I still have a job so I am a bit on edge.
For me, we need to take the politics out of the NHS. I would prefer to have an independent NHS like the Bank of England. Give it broad terms of reference and a minimum budget based on GDP so we can afford it. Then at least we can stop this bickering.
|
|
|
Post by xplosivgas on May 11, 2016 12:14:45 GMT
Good to read an informative post from someone with first hand knowledge.
Hope everything works out for you with your job. Fingers are crossed for you.
|
|
|
Post by baggins on May 11, 2016 12:26:31 GMT
Apologies if my last post was a little curt, I find out later today if I still have a job so I am a bit on edge. For me, we need to take the politics out of the NHS. I would prefer to have an independent NHS like the Bank of England. Give it broad terms of reference and a minimum budget based on GDP so we can afford it. Then at least we can stop this bickering. Hope it's good news fella. Let us know?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2016 12:31:59 GMT
Health Care is very expensive no matter what country you live in. The NHS just cannot exist in it's current state. The UK cannot afford to be the health provider for anyone in the world. With the cost of heathcare now, it is pretty easy, and quite cheap, to hop on a plane anywhere in the world, fly to the UK, and get your treatment for free. The world of 1948, when the NHS was formed, is a world away from the world of 2016. Things have to change. This is not a Labour v Tory issue, as the current Tory Government are in reality spending more on the NHS than the previous Labour Government did. You cannot just keep throwing more and more money into the NHS. It's a bottomless pit, and until the British public wake-up to the fact that the NHS desperately needs reform, then it will always be in crisis. And the reality is www.kingsfund.org.uk/projects/nhs-in-a-nutshell/health-care-spending-compared
|
|
|
Post by pirate49 on May 11, 2016 12:50:13 GMT
Shame this ended up in GC. If you read my OP it was about BREXIT and implications for football, particularly lower league clubs such as ours. Seems to have been hijacked.....................
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on May 11, 2016 13:00:13 GMT
Shame this ended up in GC. If you read my OP it was about BREXIT and implications for football, particularly lower league clubs such as ours. Seems to have been hijacked..................... Yeah, I left it a while but actually you normally get good debate out here in the colonies. Hopefully it won't go unread.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2016 13:34:06 GMT
Ok - so if the NHS can't survive without the cheap staff, how did it survive BEFORE we had a stream of cheap labour? Having worked in financial services for a long while, you see everyone's salaries and earnings and I can unequivocally say that one of the most, if not the all time number one well paid profession is healthcare. The majority of GPs are a double millionaire at retirement. Consultants hit that point late thirties early forties. Junior doctors of course need to strike - they're so downtrodden with the capitalist classes laughing at them with their paltry million pound DB pension at retirement and tiny salary whilst they slave in NHS workhouses. I am not to bothered about companies making profits as there are plenty of people making vast sums of money, well above what they are worth out of the NHS. its a terribly managed organisation. The other huge drain is the fact anyone can come here and have any condition treated for free with no questions asked. I don't want to lose free at the point of delivery healthcare. But beyond that I could not care if it's the NHS or BHS. In the same way I like TV but I don't like virgin media. So no, I'm sure the NHS will survive as it always survived without Europe, as a free at delivery service. ijf we could do this in 1960,1970, 1980 why can't we do it now without millions of imported labour? We do not pay our doctors cheaply so we are not getting cheap doctors, that's for sure. £1k a shift for a German GP working here. I'd promised myself that I would avoid these discussions as I no longer have the time or energy to debate properly, but I need to respond to this. the cost of health care is much higher now, people live longer and drugs are saving more lives, but cost. Without either a plan to get more doctors and nurses then the NHS will struggle, both in recruitment and retention, but also in buying in expensive agency staff. i also work in the financial services sector and whilst I agree some are paid well, many are not. Also, NHS staff will have an in house pension scheme so unless you deal directly with that you will by definition only see those who have more money to buy a top up arrangement. As for GP pensions and being millionaires at retirement, the NHS pension scheme is a defined benefit scheme in that the payout is based on service and salary, talk of them having a pot of money is misleading. The government states that the rule of thumb for costing a DB scheme is a factor of 20, for example a salary of £100,000pa will theoretically cost £2m. It is not their pot of money to choose what they like, it is deferred salary. Even when the rules are eventually relaxed for these schemes there will be a large tax bill should they be cashed in. With regards to the free treatment for foreigners, I was in children's A&E recently and a Spanish lady was being told in no uncertain terms that after today she will have to pay for her daughter should any ongoing treatment be required. Finally, where do you draw the line for free treatment? My son needs ongoing care, regular medication. It is hard enough getting travel insurance, Lord knows how we would cope with health cover. And it's not just him, a friend went to her GP for something trivial. There was no reason but the GP referred her for a scan anyway. Turns out she has breast cancer and had she waited a bit longer it would be terminal. If the GP was costed, she wouldn't have gone, if the scan was costed she wouldn't have gone. After treatment, were she to have had private health cover, her premiums would increase just at the time she faces redundancy. My father in law had a heart bypass done privately, when it caused complications, they didn't want to know and he ended up back in the NHS. Private health cover is fine, until something goes wrong. Interesting points. 2 points of reply; 1. Indeed DBs are valued at 20:1 for lifetime allowance purposes. That is indeed a notional value and not linked to a specific fund. The only really accurate comparison is to a level SL annuity which is roughly 6% not 5% so not really a difference. If anyone outside of DB arrangements were to purchase the same value as the DB scheme with full service, you're looking at a million if you're in good health so the only way you can compare is on this basis. A £50k income for life, index linked is a VAST cost and just because you don't have it in cash, it is the same thing. It costs the country more than a million on a risk free asset or linker bonds. It is mainly public funded and the general public do not get anything like this - because it is unaffordable. When it is smudged by smoke and mirrors through opaque government tax spending it is allowed. This is because they want to keep it that way, and they will never do the decent thing, bite the bullet of longevity and realise that they need realistic planning which the rest of the world have - in proportion to the realities of mortality and near zero bond rates and slowing global growth. Instead, the cost of healthcare goes up and up, because any changes are opposed with strikes and threats to your health "we need more tax otherwise we might not have the money to cure your condition". So why, if you are not the beloved guardians of health who really really care, why do you not sensibly agree to have pensions which are in line with the rest of the country - those who pay your wages? NO! Tantrum! The public don't understand the cost of DB schemes so we will paint this as "they're stealing our pensions and we will have to remove your treatments to preserve our pensions". That is the truth. If they were in line with 95% of pensions, it would indeed be theft. Instead, the taxpayer is the robbery victim. Utterly upsets me that these selfish sods use the threat of letting your relatives die to keep their fat gov pensions alive - yet, the private sector are the greedy ones? Secondly you speak of a world of insurance. This is not the only alternative to the NHS. You can keep the basic structure of free at delivery without having a national centralised service. Many ways this can be achieved. Lastly, don't forget that over 55% of ALL your pay is taxed when you factor in VAT, petrol taxes, insurance tax etc. If you weren't paying so much tax you might be able to afford insurance and have some money left over. Especially as you won't be paying for doctors who insist on vastly inflated pension schemes, they'd have to work at their market rate like everyone else.
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on May 11, 2016 16:57:38 GMT
Thanks for the best wishes, all fine today. I live to see the next (and should be final round) in the Autumn but at least I can enjoy the Summer.
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on May 11, 2016 17:09:32 GMT
Gregorystevens, I agree that the civil service pension schemes are unaffordable, indeed DB schemes in general. I just disagreed with the assertion that GPs are sitting on million pound pensions as some may interpret that as cash in hand. Very wealthy, yes, but not necessarily millionaires.
I also agree that strike action is not for me, but the NHS is so much more than junior doctors and consultants. Ancillary workers such as cleaners and cooks are vital but not as well paid.
It's all well and good lowering taxes, but I don't think many will benefit enough to be able to afford the health cover or even use it as intended. Maybe we should agree to disagree here.
Anyway, back to important matters. The fixture list is out in a month or so.
|
|