It's no wonder Shamesbury's didn't want to buy the Mem.

Just whip them. All of them.

Pity that this made the national news but what they did to us and more goes on without a thought from the news stations.

If any newspaper or TV newsroom printed or broadcast any item criticising Shitsburys over the Mem deal the B@stards would hit them with a massive law suit. They would sue because the High Court has said on two occasions that they were entitled to consider their contract with BRFC 1883 ltd at an end and were also granted a costs order. 

They would therefore go to town on the offending media and no doubt extract a huge payout which they would then generously. donate to charity, thereby making themselves look good. They would also gain a great deal of free press into the bargain.

I'm afraid there would be no media brave or foolish to run such a story, besides which, the local media covered the whole sorry saga from beginning to end, but had to report the facts and more or less agree at end that Sainsburys had followed due process and done nothing wrong.

There would be little interest in the story outside of Bristol, and not everyone in the area were unhappy with Sainsburys, who could forget the glee with which the Sh1!heads received the news, don't forget it has fuelled a large part of the One Turd 206 + page thread on us.

Dirty protest??

The point I am raising is that Tesco wanted out and paid a price because of what was written in the Contract.
Sainsburys had no such clause because,and here is the surprise, they drew it up and Higgs signed it.
Trash were a hindrance but not the cause of Sainsbury walking away scott free. The Contract was.
Water under the bridge and the Rovers future is very bright!!

Why would the press/media try and hunt them down? They were entitled to terminate because we signed a contract that allowed them to do so in certain circumstances. They did nothing illegal or wrong in a civil law context. The High Court and the Court of Appeal made that quite clear. There's no story there. We signed a contract which left them with too many get-out clauses, and when they felt they needed to get out, they used that right. It's not nice or friendly, but to them it's just a business deal, the kind they do with suppliers and partners all the time. And they employ the kind of lawyers who make sure they can exit those deals if they need to.

I wonder if Wael will be using Burges Salmon in any of his future contracts?