Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2016 5:43:39 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Severncider on Sept 21, 2016 6:56:47 GMT
It is noticeable that when Taylor scored the penalty, not a single player went to celebrate with him.  ?? |
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Sept 21, 2016 7:01:07 GMT
It is noticeable that when Taylor scored the penalty, not a single player went to celebrate with him. ?? Looks like they went to get the ball and get back into position coz they sensed we could get all three points. And then 12 seconds after the restart... |
|
|
|
Post by faggotygas on Sept 21, 2016 7:32:36 GMT
Player in an offside position for Swindon's goal, could possibly have been adjudged interfering with play for stopping our defender from clearing the ball off the line...
|
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Sept 21, 2016 7:34:33 GMT
Player in an offside position for Swindon's goal, could possibly have been adjudged interfering with play for stopping our defender from clearing the ball off the line... Could say similar for our second goal. |
|
|
|
Post by spiess1 on Sept 21, 2016 7:39:55 GMT
"...It is noticeable that when Taylor scored the penalty, not a single player went to celebrate with him..."
Yeh. Nor did they celebrate with the scorer of the second goal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Sept 21, 2016 7:46:41 GMT
It is noticeable that when Taylor scored the penalty, not a single player went to celebrate with him. ?? Wasn't a case of Taylor ignoring the players and running to the fans? I assume they celebrate with him on his way back? Looking at those highlights we could have been 3-0 down if Swindle had taken their chances. |
|
|
|
Post by paulpirate on Sept 21, 2016 7:48:51 GMT
It is noticeable that when Taylor scored the penalty, not a single player went to celebrate with him. ?? haha paranoid Pete |
|
|
|
Post by darkbluegas on Sept 21, 2016 9:06:57 GMT
What a difference a good quality keeper has made..........!!! A really good squad coming together that may well take another month or two to properly bed in. I'm sure we will have a really decent run in after Christmas with ups and downs leading up to that period.
Just my thoughts but I believe with the flexibility in our squad we're suited to the 4-5-1 system that allows anyone of the 5 to join the lone striker or more when we're in the ascendancy. Whilst we look settled in a 442 at home we don't have two,strikers that play well as a pair at the moment.
|
|
|
|
Post by faggotygas on Sept 21, 2016 11:09:09 GMT
Player in an offside position for Swindon's goal, could possibly have been adjudged interfering with play for stopping our defender from clearing the ball off the line... Could say similar for our second goal. Not sure I agree - Harrison is in an offside position, but the ball doesn't go anywhere near him and there's no Swindon players near him |
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Sept 21, 2016 11:19:08 GMT
Could say similar for our second goal. Not sure I agree - Harrison is in an offside position, but the ball doesn't go anywhere near him and there's no Swindon players near him In Branco wasn't worried about him getting on the end of it he'd have had no reason to try to intercept the cross. |
|
|
|
Post by faggotygas on Sept 21, 2016 11:25:06 GMT
Not sure I agree - Harrison is in an offside position, but the ball doesn't go anywhere near him and there's no Swindon players near him In Branco wasn't worried about him getting on the end of it he'd have had no reason to try to intercept the cross. That's not one of the criteria for interfering with play:
•interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate or
•interfering with an opponent by:
•preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or
•challenging an opponent for the ball or
•clearly attempting to play a ball which is close to him when this action impacts on an opponent or
•making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball
Interfering with play is a physical action. Refs can't be expected to determine what is in a player's mind - the player might not be aware of Harrison's position.
Anyway, regarding the Swindon one, I don't think realistically there was any interference there, but a close one
|
|
|
|
Post by philbemmygas on Sept 21, 2016 11:27:06 GMT
Not sure I agree - Harrison is in an offside position, but the ball doesn't go anywhere near him and there's no Swindon players near him In Branco wasn't worried about him getting on the end of it he'd have had no reason to try to intercept the cross. I don't really think he had time to make a decision either way, the driven ball cannoned of him. Something we lacked in the earlier part of the game, low and hard crosses/shots are more difficult to defend. All in all a satisfying evening in swindle. |
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Sept 21, 2016 11:32:44 GMT
In Branco wasn't worried about him getting on the end of it he'd have had no reason to try to intercept the cross. That's not one of the criteria for interfering with play:
•interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate or
•interfering with an opponent by:
•preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or
•challenging an opponent for the ball or
•clearly attempting to play a ball which is close to him when this action impacts on an opponent or
•making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball
Interfering with play is a physical action. Refs can't be expected to determine what is in a player's mind - the player might not be aware of Harrison's position.
Anyway, regarding the Swindon one, I don't think realistically there was any interference there, but a close one
I realise they don't give decisions for that any more, but I was saying that it is similar situation to their goal, coz their guy was only dubiously affecting play and they don't give those decisions very often any more, either. I wouldn't have given either decision, but back in the day, they would/should have both been given. |
|
|
|
Post by WeAreTheGas on Sept 21, 2016 12:06:53 GMT
Great spirit shown and a big 3 points that will hopefully kickstart our season, but they cut through us far too easily to set up that Norris 1v1 at 1-0.
Roos did excellently, but Norris should be scoring and if he makes it 2-0 we're probably getting a draw at best.
Fine margins!
But delighted with the win.
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Sept 21, 2016 12:41:03 GMT
Easter played a big part in both goals, won the pen after a clumsy tackle then hit the shot which was deflected into the goal for the second.
|
|
|
|
Post by Severncider on Sept 21, 2016 13:06:27 GMT
It is noticeable that when Taylor scored the penalty, not a single player went to celebrate with him. ??
And then 12 seconds after the restart... I overlooked that point. |
|
|
|
Post by faggotygas on Sept 21, 2016 14:29:55 GMT
That's not one of the criteria for interfering with play:
•interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate or
•interfering with an opponent by:
•preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or
•challenging an opponent for the ball or
•clearly attempting to play a ball which is close to him when this action impacts on an opponent or
•making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball
Interfering with play is a physical action. Refs can't be expected to determine what is in a player's mind - the player might not be aware of Harrison's position.
Anyway, regarding the Swindon one, I don't think realistically there was any interference there, but a close one
I realise they don't give decisions for that any more, but I was saying that it is similar situation to their goal, coz their guy was only dubiously affecting play and they don't give those decisions very often any more, either. I wouldn't have given either decision, but back in the day, they would/should have both been given. Back in the day, definately. |
|
|
|
Post by William Wilson on Sept 21, 2016 15:02:17 GMT
It is noticeable that when Taylor scored the penalty, not a single player went to celebrate with him. ?? Wasn't a case of Taylor ignoring the players and running to the fans? I assume they celebrate with him on his way back? Looking at those highlights we could have been 3-0 down if Swindle had taken their chances. To be fair, the highlights show just about every good thing that Swindon did. They don`t show the 70 odd minutes when we pretty much bossed them about. it would have been a travesty if we hadn`t won. |
|
|
|
Post by 2nd May 1990 on Sept 21, 2016 20:28:20 GMT
Looking at those highlights, Swindon had two guilt edged chances. I suppose we also had Gaffers' one which he should have netted. I want to highlight Ellis' excellent header in the build up to the penalty. Haven't seen him get much credit for this but it was a good piece of work.
|
|
??
