Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2016 22:12:18 GMT
I was at the game and we didn't deserve to win based on the first half alone, it was a complete utter shambles and we were thinking keeping it down to 4 would be the best we could hope for. Credit for the team for pulling it back but although we didn't deserve to win its a game we could have won. Certainly a lot to work on put it that way. thanks for that,i listened on the radio and it sounded poor,the trouble with the 4-3-3 for me is our top striker is on the left wing?? anyway there are valid arguments on rotation and formation but i believe the op should have waited until after the match The thing is, I dont think tightening up at the back would necessarily affect our continued goalscoring form at the other end. Imagine if we cut down on the leaked goals, we'd be a shoe-in for promotion easy. God knows whats happened to Bodin, i've never seen a player go from hero to zero so quickly. Well to sum it up im all for rotation but on a lot lesser scale than DC is doing at the moment.
|
|
|
Post by chiefscout on Oct 19, 2016 11:36:24 GMT
Put Mansell back as defensive midfielder. We will not leak many goals then.
|
|
|
Post by oldtoteender on Oct 19, 2016 11:48:27 GMT
I was at the game and we didn't deserve to win based on the first half alone, it was a complete utter shambles and we were thinking keeping it down to 4 would be the best we could hope for. Credit for the team for pulling it back but although we didn't deserve to win its a game we could have won. Certainly a lot to work on put it that way. thanks for that,i listened on the radio and it sounded poor,the trouble with the 4-3-3 for me is our top striker is on the left wing?? anyway there are valid arguments on rotation and formation but i believe the op should have waited until after the match Well i was also tuned into the commentary and at the time even the commentators said it was shambolic that is why i posted then through frustration but perhaps if i had left it till after the game i would not be a PLONKER !
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2016 12:12:36 GMT
thanks for that,i listened on the radio and it sounded poor,the trouble with the 4-3-3 for me is our top striker is on the left wing?? anyway there are valid arguments on rotation and formation but i believe the op should have waited until after the match Well i was also tuned into the commentary and at the time even the commentators said it was shambolic that is why i posted then through frustration but perhaps if i had left it till after the game i would not be a PLONKER ! maybe i shouldnt have said that? but the team has done enough these last 2 and a bit seasons to deserve better than being written off before the end of the game. like i said its worthy of debate about possible over rotation by the manager?
|
|
|
Post by Blackbeard on Oct 19, 2016 14:49:50 GMT
The op question / gripe before , during or after the game is entirely valid!
I was at the game and thought the same thing pre ko
And seven mins in we are one down - so how can he be castigated for a justified and even prophetic gripe?
Listening on the radio vs being there and seeing the first half shambles with your own eyes.....you'd think the op was fine as well!
|
|