Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2016 7:28:51 GMT
"Sky News finds around two-thirds of convicted terrorists released from jail refused to engage with deradicalisation programmes. The vast majority of convicted terrorists jailed over the past 15 years are now back on Britain's streets, a Sky News investigation has discovered. Around three-quarters of the 583 people imprisoned on terror charges in the years since the 9/11 attacks have now served their sentences and been released from UK prisons, many still holding the same extremist beliefs that got them jailed in the first place.
Sky News has been told that around two-thirds of those released refused to engage with prison deradicalisation programmes aimed at addressing their extremist behaviour." So, why are we letting them out of prison? We are often told that prison is not about punishment, but about rehabilitation, so if they refuse to 'rehabilitate' then don't let them out. Isn't it about time that society (ie. us in general) toughened up a bit link |
|
|
|
Post by William Wilson on Nov 1, 2016 7:54:25 GMT
"Sky News finds around two-thirds of convicted terrorists released from jail refused to engage with deradicalisation programmes. The vast majority of convicted terrorists jailed over the past 15 years are now back on Britain's streets, a Sky News investigation has discovered. Around three-quarters of the 583 people imprisoned on terror charges in the years since the 9/11 attacks have now served their sentences and been released from UK prisons, many still holding the same extremist beliefs that got them jailed in the first place.
Sky News has been told that around two-thirds of those released refused to engage with prison deradicalisation programmes aimed at addressing their extremist behaviour." So, why are we letting them out of prison? We are often told that prison is not about punishment, but about rehabilitation, so if they refuse to 'rehabilitate' then don't let them out. Isn't it about time that society (ie. us in general) toughened up a bit linkDon`t let them out?? I can see that going down well with Baroness Chakrabarti. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2016 8:21:12 GMT
"Sky News finds around two-thirds of convicted terrorists released from jail refused to engage with deradicalisation programmes. The vast majority of convicted terrorists jailed over the past 15 years are now back on Britain's streets, a Sky News investigation has discovered. Around three-quarters of the 583 people imprisoned on terror charges in the years since the 9/11 attacks have now served their sentences and been released from UK prisons, many still holding the same extremist beliefs that got them jailed in the first place.
Sky News has been told that around two-thirds of those released refused to engage with prison deradicalisation programmes aimed at addressing their extremist behaviour." So, why are we letting them out of prison? We are often told that prison is not about punishment, but about rehabilitation, so if they refuse to 'rehabilitate' then don't let them out. Isn't it about time that society (ie. us in general) toughened up a bit linkDon`t let them out?? I can see that going down well with Baroness Chakrabarti. She'll come around. After all, we know she will and the only question is the price. |
|
|
|
Post by inee on Nov 1, 2016 14:50:27 GMT
Read somewhere a while back that not everyone coming back is jailed,make of that what you will.
Australia is considering not allowing any of its citizens who went to fight back on it's soil, if that was adopted worldwide then less would go in the first place.
One of the things that does make me chuckle is isis want to kill us for killing muslims, but they have killed more muslims than we have .
As an aside i see that some migrants are trying to sue germany for not doing enough over their status, is it also correct nobs that merkel could be chucked out of her job as leader.
Also read that migrants in france whining because they had to clean their own accommodation after being rehomed in the jungle clear out , even had the cheek to whine that there's no halal meat, so are being forced to live of veg n rice (lucky lady gardens would love fresh veg everyday) . If they trouble to read their book it says if no halal, then they can eat kosher, if no kosher, then they can eat local meat, the mind boggles
|
|
|
|
Post by William Wilson on Nov 1, 2016 15:19:39 GMT
Read somewhere a while back that not everyone coming back is jailed,make of that what you will. Australia is considering not allowing any of its citizens who went to fight back on it's soil, if that was adopted worldwide then less would go in the first place. One of the things that does make me chuckle is isis want to kill us for killing muslims, but they have killed more muslims than we have . Yes, but Allah told them that was ok. He personally said to them, " Listen up, our Mohammed, you kill absolutely anyone you please, as long as you do it for Islam." And so they do. As the whole world can see. As to your points concerning their dietary requirements; how about gay Muslims? Are they allowed to eat pork? |
|
|
|
Post by William Wilson on Nov 1, 2016 15:44:15 GMT
Don`t let them out?? I can see that going down well with Baroness Chakrabarti. She'll come around. After all, we know she will and the only question is the price. Nobby, I`m sick to the back teeth with your right wing cynicism. I never doubted that the Labour party was utterly and completely, and completely utterly, free of any suggestion of anti-Semitism. However, it was immensely reassuring to have this confirmed by the principled and diligent Ms Chakrabarti, and in my opinion she fully deserves her elevation to the house of lords. PS. Could she be related to Ilse Koch? I think we should be told. |
|
