|
Post by Topper Gas on Dec 29, 2016 13:27:11 GMT
Problem of pulling up other posters threads is that we all post nonsense on here at some point: gaschat.co.uk/post/242037Glad DC thought the same as me against Coventry Coventry were that poor I think we could have beat them whatever formation we played. Come on Tbone that is poor from you son. TBone? I doubt BB would have set up one goal and scored the other 3 from the bench? But of course you're never wrong! I still don't get the suggestion that Coventry were that poor as until BB scored our third the game was wide open and could easily have been 2-2. I've no idea where this thread's going on as I doubt anybody thinks it would be good business to sell MT & bring in MG as his replacement, although isn't he a CF rather than No 10 anyway. d
|
|
|
Post by yategas78 on Dec 29, 2016 17:00:37 GMT
If we sale Matty Taylor it must only be because he wants away if not it would be mad just to cash in where's the ambition and forward thinking in that??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2016 17:17:07 GMT
If we sale Matty Taylor it must only be because he wants away if not it would be mad just to cash in where's the ambition and forward thinking in that?? Nothing to do with the clubs ambition tho if it's true a release clause is written into Mattees current contract.
|
|