|
|
Post by inee on Jun 7, 2017 21:19:30 GMT
I hear that one of the terrorists actually previously appeared on a TV documentary about extremism and was arguing with a copper after being accused of flying an ISIS flag. Why the f**k was this w**ker not shot on the spot at the time? yes they were sat in a park with the isis flag, visit the guardian website, on one of the items on the dead terrorists theres a link to the documentry heres 2 links www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2016/jan/20/jihadis-next-door-review-channel-4-isis-abu-rumaysahheres the documentary it may get taken down the bit i mentioned is at 15:20 ish |
|
|
|
Post by inee on Jun 7, 2017 21:28:40 GMT
Laws have to be changed, and pretty quickly. If they can change the law quickly concerning the streaming of content from the Internet via a Kodi box, and threaten you with 10 years in prison, I'm pretty sure that people being vapourized or having their throats cut is a much more important reason to change the law quickly! If Paedos are caught with disturbing images of children on their phones or laptops, then that is a criminal offence (quite rightly). They can then be locked up. That person may not have actually committed any offences against children, but by being in the possession of those images it is sufficient to find them guilty. The same should apply to any terrorist propaganda videos or pictures. Thing is though nobs , as long as civilians keep getting murdered nothing will change, but if a business was targeted then the laws would be rushed through , your 2 example sums it up totally not sure if you meant it too. up to 10 years for pirating (directly taking money from large companies) peado, getting stupidly short sentances or no sentance at all(look it up (it ruins lives but doesn't take money from large companies)) murdering civilians (does not affect large companies (so laws get changes as and when)). Another thing that boils me pish, is figures released stating 3000(ish) on watch list 20000 other who are known to sympathise with isis. why haven't those 3000 been handed over to special forces victims families for practise on. |
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jun 19, 2017 5:13:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Jun 19, 2017 7:10:20 GMT
a 'revenge' attack was always going to happen. And given the 'new way' of just driving into people, not hard to imagine some of the wankers going "I can do that"
I just hope this sub-human is plastered all over the papers and the gutter press rip him to shreds
|
|
|
|
Post by inee on Jun 19, 2017 12:35:23 GMT
Agree ,heard someone criticising the security services ,why can't people understand that this type of attack cannot be planned for as it can happen at anytime in anyplace.
I wait with interest to see what the charges are and the sentance
|
|
