|
Post by wiaww on Nov 3, 2016 13:48:45 GMT
I hear there are many Brighton fans nostalgic about the withdean! The mem means nothing to us, our spiritual home (like brighton's) long since gone. The club has no future above league one at the mem. That is pretty obvious. I'm not having that. The Goldstone was Brightons home with the Withdean being a temporary measure...a sh** one. And to suggest that the Mem' means nothing to us is nuts as well. It may mean nothing to some but for anyone under 30 there's a good chance it's all that's ever been known.
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Nov 3, 2016 12:44:06 GMT
Slightly off-topic but perhaps someone will humour me: if the Leave camp are so convinced that the majority of the UK's electorate are pro-Brexit why the terrible fear of a second referendum? and if that second referendum produces a 'remain' vote, do we have a third referendum? Is it a 'best of three' competition? After the next General Election, do we have another General Election just in case people have changed their minds? Parliament voted by 6-1 to hold a Referendum thinking that they would win. They lost, so they should either deal with it, or get out ! I'd be happy with them getting out. And I imagine it's quite likely we'll see an early GE in the wake of today's ruling. I understand what you're saying, I think that a second referendum opens up a huge can of worms, but if the majority of the electorate favour leaving the EU then it wouldn't produce a remain vote - unless of course you're suggesting that the referendum process is flawed.
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Nov 3, 2016 12:19:11 GMT
Slightly off-topic but perhaps someone will humour me: if the Leave camp are so convinced that the majority of the UK's electorate are pro-Brexit why the terrible fear of a second referendum?
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Nov 2, 2016 9:59:53 GMT
Monty's was definitely a cross! Take that slice of fortune after Saturday though. Brilliant skill to make the room for the shot / cross though. Absolutely. Montano is a class act and fast becoming one of my favourite players.
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Nov 2, 2016 9:55:51 GMT
OTIB circle-jerk bait thread.
Having said that I like your optimism! I think that if we’re in the Top Six come Christmas it’s going to get very interesting indeed, both in terms of playing staff and the new stadium. A promotion to the Championship would likely make us a much more attractive prospect to potential investors…
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Nov 2, 2016 9:49:30 GMT
Monty's was definitely a cross! Take that slice of fortune after Saturday though.
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Nov 1, 2016 23:04:44 GMT
7 of our starting line up tonight played for ius in the conference. What a tremendous achievement that they have taken us to 5th in league 1 in less than two years! 8 think you might be forgetting something ? I thought the kettle had been replaced recently?
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Nov 1, 2016 21:13:59 GMT
4 or 5 chances in this match so far. Sadly all have fallen to Matttee Tee. Complete and utter twat of a post It started as genuine "clueless" criticism and now I think he's keeping it up in part because he likes the attention but mostly because he's hoping that people will assume he's been on the wind up the whole time! The saddest part is that he's more than old enough to know better so should really be able to hold his hands up and admit he's got it wrong. Embarrassing really.
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Nov 1, 2016 21:05:25 GMT
Get Taylor and Harrison off HAHAHAHAHA
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Oct 29, 2016 22:20:26 GMT
Bloody keep up!!! He's used that phrase many times over the last two years. So what have we got on the DC interview bingo? Take our medicine. Have a right good go. My players are an honest bunch You know Any others to add? "Happy days!"
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Oct 29, 2016 18:02:54 GMT
Dilly ding, dilly done.
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Oct 28, 2016 23:01:04 GMT
Spot on with that second paragraph. I didn't say being gay is an inherent trait, I inferred that sexuality is. Sexuality is, in the vast majority of cases, not a choice. If it were I would imagine that the countless historical examples of attempts to find a "cure" for homosexuality would have been considerably more successful - considering how horrendously grim the "treatments" were for the so-called patients. www.ushmm.org/wlc/mobile/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005261Why oh why does everyone go down your route to justify your perceptions, ffs is this supposed to shock anyone, why is it when people have no proof they dig up sh**e from ww2 as if it somehow makes one persons view more honourable than someone else's, if you had bothered to think about it and used your loaf ,you probably would have posted something that is truly shocking and not overly well known, and that is the fact that the uk used those very methods in institutions well after the war ended. Do you actually read wot i rite or do you just deliberately miss the point every time? I honestly can't tell.
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Oct 28, 2016 16:51:09 GMT
The difference being Chris is an intolerable, intolerant c*nt for disliking someone based on an inherent trait. Being an intolerable, intolerant c*nt like Chris (and plenty on here it seems) is absolutely grounds for disliking someone, so Dave is well within his rights. Why do you refer to being Gay as an inherent trait? Do you not know anyone who has been 'converted'? Likewise the other way round? Some people may think they come across as really on the ball and always right when really they chat bollocks. Plenty on here as it happens. Spot on with that second paragraph. I didn't say being gay is an inherent trait, I inferred that sexuality is. Sexuality is, in the vast majority of cases, not a choice. If it were I would imagine that the countless historical examples of attempts to find a "cure" for homosexuality would have been considerably more successful - considering how horrendously grim the "treatments" were for the so-called patients. www.ushmm.org/wlc/mobile/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005261
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Oct 28, 2016 16:31:51 GMT
The difference being Chris is an intolerable, intolerant c*nt for disliking someone based on an inherent trait. Being an intolerable, intolerant c*nt like Chris (and plenty on here it seems) is absolutely grounds for disliking someone, so Dave is well within his rights. so in essence what you are saying is it's ok for dave to be intolerant towards chris because chris doesn't like what dave does ,but it's not ok for chris to be intolerant towards dave. when in real life both will think the other is a lady garden and not bother speaking to each other, what about colin you forgot colin, colin is just standing by his mate daves side as he chris's mate not daves, So how is this scenario any different to the one you typed No, that's not what I'm saying. Both may think the other a c*nt, but only one of them is correct. I've explained quite clearly why in the post you replied to.
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Oct 28, 2016 11:56:48 GMT
Chris doesn`t like Dave, because Dave`s gay. Colin doesn`t like Chris, because Chris doesn`t like Dave, because Dave`s gay. And the wheels on the bus... The difference being Chris is an intolerable, intolerant c*nt for disliking someone based on an inherent trait. Being an intolerable, intolerant c*nt like Chris (and plenty on here it seems) is absolutely grounds for disliking someone, so Dave is well within his rights.
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Oct 27, 2016 22:12:25 GMT
------------------Roos----------------- --------J Clarke--Lockyer--JCS--------- Leadbitter --------------------Brown ----------Sinclair--Lines------------- -------------Colkett------------------ ----------Taylor----Harrison--------- Not a bad shout. Could see this being the starting line up Saturday.
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Oct 27, 2016 12:39:15 GMT
Are you one of those who believe in free speech as long as it fits in with your own beliefs and opinions. I fully believe in an individuals right to like or dislike who or what they want,and will always support that as i will support the rights of other to speak out about it. If you have every looked at my posts on this bollocks people spout about skin colour, i will always maintain that the only race that exists on this earth is the human race, i also openly state that it's only the politically correct/sheep/or so called anti-racist that actually define a person based on colour. The rest of us just see another person after all we are the same. As for this no choice sh**e, people choose who they are attracted to as i said before a lot of gays try out women first so supposing you are right in your assumption that it's not a choice, why do they choose to try a woman first as surely to support your view they would be genetically programmed to go one way and one way only, and would not use the old adage of oh i didnt want to come out or i wasn't sure, it's simply a matter of they prefer the feel of one sex over another simple as. where on this thread have i been anti gay,i hate my gay nephew with a vengeance however his boyfriend i get on well with so how is that any different from hating someone else who is straight or as you put it a different colour , the real issue is people would pick up on the fact that my nephew is gay and would start spouting the homophobic bollocks or your a racist bollocks based on their own inherent bandwagon jumping, not realising that a Lady garden is a Lady garden and im entitled to hate who i want when i want. Remember the phobia this and phobia that is a recent invention to put down those who disagree with others and to keep freethinkers in their place, do you honestly believe in suppressing free speech just in case someone doesn't like what someone else says, if so you are just carrying on bLairs dirt work. Again if someone went to their boss and said i was called a hetro dickhead, then the only thing offensive is that you were called a dickhead(unless of course you weren't hetro), besides if others are that worried about saying something that maybe something(aphobic) to others then they must live a life full of worry I assume this is directed at me. I believe in free speech so long as it neither promotes nor incites hatred based upon an individual’s inherent characteristics. Fortunately I live in country that supports that in law, many don’t have that luxury. I haven’t looked at your posts on skin colour, which is why I asked. It’s amazing that you can hold such progressive views on race, yet be so utterly backwards in your understanding of sexuality. I hope that one day all of our society is able to view people as individuals, rather than try to define them by creed. I also hope that you are able to understand that in the OVERWHELMING majority of cases people identify to the sexuality that they are genetically predisposed to, and that there is nothing they can or should do about that. I infer from your posts in this thread that you are a heterosexual male; based upon the views you’ve shared in the above post I would be interested to know as to when you made a conscious decision to be heterosexual. I have never made a conscious decision to be attracted to the gender I am attracted to, nor do I know anybody that has. Again, your original use of the “hetro dickhead” example was an attempt to highlight some perceived injustice between the treatment of straight people and gay people. This is, from a point of law, absolute nonsense. I’ve no way of knowing whether you have experienced this treatment first hand, but if you have then you should know that I find that equally as intolerable as if a homosexual employee should face discrimination in the workplace. As I said earlier, one injustice does not invalidate another. I must say that I find it peculiar that it is almost without exception that those who experience these misbalances of "political correctness" are the most vocal of opponents to anti-discrimination laws…
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Oct 27, 2016 11:11:43 GMT
You're talking nonsense. Spouting a rhetoric that supports your prejudices. If a colleague was discriminatory towards you based on your heterosexuality and you reported it and your employer didn't investigate they would be breaking the law. No i'm talking of events that happened, i could fire back that you seem to be one of those who has pandered to popular opinions. I couldn't possibly state on this forum some of the injustice i have seen due to diversity(i'm willing to talk face to face, no threat intended but some things can only be said face to face allegedly as it then become he said /i said in the eyes of the law) . One i can openly state is one of my neighbours on the opposite side of the road is like a sister to me and wend. Had the filth here a while back and she said i'm off now i'm outnumbered by you whiteys, i then said yeah go on sis feck of back to your own side of the road run away like usual, i was then told that if i continued i would be reported for a hate crime, sis went apeshit with the copper, who didn't like being told that she was singling my sis out for not being white The other thing is if someone at work called me a deaf/dumb and stupid white Lady garden, i would find it amusing and not think oh i have to run off and report it. As an aside if you genuinely went in and said oh so and so called me a hetro dickhead your boss would probably say ok i will have a word about you being called a dickhead. The popularity of an opinion doesn’t have a bearing on its validity. Nor does injustice invalidate other injustice. I don’t know what “events” have happened in your life but I don’t see how any of them can justify your awful attitude toward homosexuality. You’ve taken this thread and used it as a platform for your views against “political correctness” and somehow justify your homophobia as “free speech”. Do you believe it is acceptable to judge based on the colour of an individual’s skin, or hair, or eyes? Homosexuality is no more a choice than melanin levels are. As an aside, if you genuinely went in and said "oh so-and-so called me a hetero' dickhead" your boss would be legally obliged to investigate possible discrimination based on sexual orientation.
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Oct 27, 2016 10:41:18 GMT
The gayest thing a man can do is worry about what another bloke is doing with his c*ck...
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Oct 27, 2016 10:33:40 GMT
Hey this is all getting a little heavy; time to lighten up with some jokes. I'll start the ball rolling with...... Two condoms were walking past a gay bar. One turned to the other and said "Let's go in there and get sh**-faced!" Nah this is just the type of discussion we need as we all have differing opinions on what is acceptable to us. I was interested in your earlier reply and was thinking if you openly expressed your feelings at work you would be technically hung drawn and quartered, however if a colleague said they disliked you because you were hetro then almost nothing would be said You're talking nonsense. Spouting a rhetoric that supports your prejudices. If a colleague was discriminatory towards you based on your heterosexuality and you reported it and your employer didn't investigate they would be breaking the law.
|
|