|
Post by Finnish Gas on Aug 6, 2018 14:29:36 GMT
Does anyone know about this? Is it relevant to out transfer situation?
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Aug 6, 2018 14:31:56 GMT
No idea. The shirts are now on sale with both logos, so I imagine that if there was an issue, we negotiated a fine rather than have to go to the massive trouble of re-doing all our kits. 6 figures seems a bit steep, though.
And also asking the BP to actually investigate something is pretty funny.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2018 14:34:32 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2018 14:43:20 GMT
Hong Kong gas, if you post on here, how do you know we are paying a 6 figure sum in compensation?
|
|
|
Post by c4h10 on Aug 6, 2018 14:43:51 GMT
No idea. The shirts are now on sale with both logos, so I imagine that if there was an issue, we negotiated a fine rather than have to go to the massive trouble of re-doing all our kits. 6 figures seems a bit steep, though.And also asking the BP to actually investigate something is pretty funny. What's the betting?
|
|
|
Post by legas on Aug 6, 2018 15:21:00 GMT
No idea. The shirts are now on sale with both logos, so I imagine that if there was an issue, we negotiated a fine rather than have to go to the massive trouble of re-doing all our kits. 6 figures seems a bit steep, though.And also asking the BP to actually investigate something is pretty funny. What's the betting? The way this summer has been going I’d say odds on!
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Aug 6, 2018 16:05:53 GMT
Why would we pay a six figure fine when we've never worn the shirts in a league match, surely it's cheaper to just scrap the shirts and start again? Losing the five or six figure sponsorship deal is a bigger concern?
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 18,765
|
Post by pirate on Aug 6, 2018 16:07:19 GMT
All a bit of a farce really.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2018 16:17:35 GMT
Why would we pay a six figure fine when we've never worn the shirts in a league match, surely it's cheaper to just scrap the shirts and start again? Losing the five or six figure sponsorship deal is a bigger concern? Are we removing one of the sponsors? Mint? And having to pay it back?
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Aug 6, 2018 16:33:35 GMT
Why would we pay a six figure fine when we've never worn the shirts in a league match, surely it's cheaper to just scrap the shirts and start again? Losing the five or six figure sponsorship deal is a bigger concern? Are we removing one of the sponsors? Mint? And having to pay it back? The shirts were on display in the club shop today with all the sponsors in place.
|
|
|
Post by gregsy on Aug 6, 2018 16:36:27 GMT
Are we removing one of the sponsors? Mint? And having to pay it back? The shirts were on display in the club shop today with all the sponsors in place. Future collectors items those....
|
|
|
Post by Gas_Quarters on Aug 6, 2018 16:37:00 GMT
I wonder how much Stoke get fined for having Bet365 as their sponsor.
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Aug 6, 2018 16:47:04 GMT
I wonder how much Stoke get fined for having Bet365 as their sponsor. As much as we (won't) be for having FI as main sponsor?
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Aug 6, 2018 20:04:35 GMT
I wonder how much Stoke get fined for having Bet365 as their sponsor. Its apparently the deal with skybet allowing only one other gambling sponsorship and we have two. The football index thing is weird. I get it is covered by the gambling thing, but it really is something different and not really gambling at all in my view. Its as much gambling as my pension pot in some respects
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2018 20:23:19 GMT
I wonder how much Stoke get fined for having Bet365 as their sponsor. Its apparently the deal with skybet allowing only one other gambling sponsorship and we have two. The football index thing is weird. I get it is covered by the gambling thing, but it really is something different and not really gambling at all in my view. Its as much gambling as my pension pot in some respects You would think our Commercial Director would have been aware of the commercial constraints of existing contracts. Just a thought
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Aug 6, 2018 20:36:03 GMT
Its apparently the deal with skybet allowing only one other gambling sponsorship and we have two. The football index thing is weird. I get it is covered by the gambling thing, but it really is something different and not really gambling at all in my view. Its as much gambling as my pension pot in some respects You would think our Commercial Director would have been aware of the commercial constraints of existing contracts. Just a thought The fact the players were wearing shirts with stickers over the Mint adverts suggests otherwise? As far as the suggestion FI is not related to betting by some posters this is lifted straight from their website: About Football INDEX BetIndex Ltd have launched the world's first football stock market, Football INDEX, where traders can buy and sell shares in professional footballers with real money. The UK licensed gambling platform provides customers with an exciting alternative to the traditional and overly crowded sports betting markets. The first of its kind, Football INDEX is revolutionary in offering customers a chance to bet on the future success of football players, rather than gambling on the short-lived outcome of football matches. The platform operates with all the characteristics of a stock market, with traders buying units of footballers (known as 'Futures'), building their football portfolios and trying to sell at a profit As well as trading footballers for profit, customers have the chance of multiple 'wins' from a single bet. Football INDEX’s daily Buzz Chart is UK media monitor determines the trending footballer in the news each day. Any traders holding futures in the trending footballer will receive a dividend payout per future held.
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Aug 6, 2018 20:39:53 GMT
You would think our Commercial Director would have been aware of the commercial constraints of existing contracts. Just a thought The fact the players were wearing shirts with stickers over the Mint adverts suggests otherwise? As far as the suggestion FI is not related to betting by some posters this is lifted straight from their website: About Football INDEX BetIndex Ltd have launched the world's first football stock market, Football INDEX, where traders can buy and sell shares in professional footballers with real money. The UK licensed gambling platform provides customers with an exciting alternative to the traditional and overly crowded sports betting markets. The first of its kind, Football INDEX is revolutionary in offering customers a chance to bet on the future success of football players, rather than gambling on the short-lived outcome of football matches. The platform operates with all the characteristics of a stock market, with traders buying units of footballers (known as 'Futures'), building their football portfolios and trying to sell at a profit As well as trading footballers for profit, customers have the chance of multiple 'wins' from a single bet. Football INDEX’s daily Buzz Chart is UK media monitor determines the trending footballer in the news each day. Any traders holding futures in the trending footballer will receive a dividend payout per future held. Not saying Football Index isnt gambling, just its not in the traditional sense. My pension pot isnt classed as gambling though, but it has the same effect. Aviva take my money invest it and it either makes money or loses it and I get to take my money out at the end
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Aug 6, 2018 20:50:52 GMT
The fact the players were wearing shirts with stickers over the Mint adverts suggests otherwise? As far as the suggestion FI is not related to betting by some posters this is lifted straight from their website: About Football INDEX BetIndex Ltd have launched the world's first football stock market, Football INDEX, where traders can buy and sell shares in professional footballers with real money. The UK licensed gambling platform provides customers with an exciting alternative to the traditional and overly crowded sports betting markets. The first of its kind, Football INDEX is revolutionary in offering customers a chance to bet on the future success of football players, rather than gambling on the short-lived outcome of football matches. The platform operates with all the characteristics of a stock market, with traders buying units of footballers (known as 'Futures'), building their football portfolios and trying to sell at a profit As well as trading footballers for profit, customers have the chance of multiple 'wins' from a single bet. Football INDEX’s daily Buzz Chart is UK media monitor determines the trending footballer in the news each day. Any traders holding futures in the trending footballer will receive a dividend payout per future held. Not saying Football Index isnt gambling, just its not in the traditional sense. My pension pot isnt classed as gambling though, but it has the same effect. Aviva take my money invest it and it either makes money or loses it and I get to take my money out at the end But they invest your money on the stock exchange or in funds so you are always likely to get some of it back even if the FTSE crashes plus it'll be protected by the FSA, and you can't get "multiple" wins if one of your shares does well!! If you invest £10K you'll virtually always get it back over any 5 year period bet on FI, pick the wrong players, and you could lose the lot some must lose or the company would go bust.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2018 20:52:20 GMT
The fact the players were wearing shirts with stickers over the Mint adverts suggests otherwise? As far as the suggestion FI is not related to betting by some posters this is lifted straight from their website: About Football INDEX BetIndex Ltd have launched the world's first football stock market, Football INDEX, where traders can buy and sell shares in professional footballers with real money. The UK licensed gambling platform provides customers with an exciting alternative to the traditional and overly crowded sports betting markets. The first of its kind, Football INDEX is revolutionary in offering customers a chance to bet on the future success of football players, rather than gambling on the short-lived outcome of football matches. The platform operates with all the characteristics of a stock market, with traders buying units of footballers (known as 'Futures'), building their football portfolios and trying to sell at a profit As well as trading footballers for profit, customers have the chance of multiple 'wins' from a single bet. Football INDEX’s daily Buzz Chart is UK media monitor determines the trending footballer in the news each day. Any traders holding futures in the trending footballer will receive a dividend payout per future held. Not saying Football Index isnt gambling, just its not in the traditional sense. My pension pot isnt classed as gambling though, but it has the same effect. Aviva take my money invest it and it either makes money or loses it and I get to take my money out at the end That's how I read it. But the language is unfortunate to say the least.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2018 20:56:07 GMT
Not saying Football Index isnt gambling, just its not in the traditional sense. My pension pot isnt classed as gambling though, but it has the same effect. Aviva take my money invest it and it either makes money or loses it and I get to take my money out at the end But they invest your money on the stock exchange or in funds so you are always likely to get some of it back even if the FTSE crashes plus it'll be protected by the FSA, and you can't get "multiple" wins if one of your shares does well!! If you invest £10K you'll virtually always get it back over any 5 year period bet on FI, pick the wrong players, and you could lose the lot some must lose or the company would go bust. Topper That's factually incorrect. The deposit guarantee does apply to investments in shares. You will "virtually always get it back over 5 years is also not true.
|
|