|
Post by newmarketgas on Jul 24, 2014 15:55:38 GMT
This seems to be taking a very long time, as Wycombe said "nothing to see here". Has anyone got an inside edge on this ? To me, the longer it goes on the more chance, what ever the verdict, people will start to think 'No smoke without fire' .
|
|
|
Post by curlywurly on Jul 24, 2014 17:10:36 GMT
I sense the FA deem it so unimportant, they have filed it under B. I might be wrong
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2014 18:07:06 GMT
A very reliable source who is a friend of Lee Johnsons who also works at the council whose mate works down the mem who has the ear of a board member has reliably told me there is no news.
|
|
|
Post by newmarketgas on Jul 24, 2014 19:10:53 GMT
Dinsdale, you know him too ? He is useless ! I think the file under B is about right.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2014 19:24:38 GMT
Yeah i know him as im special and well connected !! Expect big news tmw / the next day /Next week and remember you heard it here first.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2014 19:31:26 GMT
Dinsdle made the first team!
|
|
|
Post by inee on Jul 24, 2014 20:04:32 GMT
A very reliable source who is a friend of Lee Johnsons who also works at the council whose mate works down the mem who has the ear of a board member has reliably told me there is no news. Are you sure as the Cia, homeland security ,Mi5 ,scotland yard and gchq, beam waves directly to my mind, and today they said although Dins is right dont believe him as the board member is Lee Johnsons ho , so tells him what he wants to hear, i know this is true as when i put my tinfoil inter governmental lunatics brainwave declustering sex nugget pony blue whale, truth killing hat on. the messages stopped, I blame that ruddy hugo enemy of the people
|
|
|
Post by newmarketgas on Jul 24, 2014 20:05:36 GMT
Congrats Dinsdale ! One problem, the colour of the stars is like last years away strip. :0)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2014 21:10:25 GMT
So making the first team basically means i talk a lot !?
|
|
|
Post by newmarketgas on Jul 24, 2014 21:25:21 GMT
Uuummmm, Yes. :0)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2014 21:25:51 GMT
So making the first team basically means i talk a lot !? no, it means you type a lot
|
|
|
Post by gasincider on Jul 24, 2014 22:30:34 GMT
The club have been made aware that there are three players involved in third party ownership, but Wycombe will not name the two latest ones. Next week, there is full disclosure to all parties and Wycombe will then have to name them. Then we will know for sure they played last season and had a material effect on the final table.
The club are not holding their breath that justice will be done, but Wycombe will obviously be hit hard. If we sue them they have admitted it will bankrupt them
|
|
|
Post by newmarketgas on Jul 25, 2014 5:33:48 GMT
gasincider, would I be right in thinking this could be a huge problem for the F.A / League, as they signed off over the new owners ? We could sue all three if proved right ?
|
|
|
Post by Hugo Admin on Jul 25, 2014 6:48:24 GMT
The club have been made aware that there are three players involved in third party ownership, but Wycombe will not name the two latest ones. Next week, there is full disclosure to all parties and Wycombe will then have to name them. Then we will know for sure they played last season and had a material effect on the final table. The club are not holding their breath that justice will be done, but Wycombe will obviously be hit hard. If we sue them they have admitted it will bankrupt them pray tell.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo Admin on Jul 25, 2014 6:54:39 GMT
Where did you hear this? A quick look on the Wycombe forum shows some gashead saying the FA have basically said don't waste our time?
I hope that if Wycombe did cheat then we sue them in to the ground and they fold like paper hats.
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Jul 25, 2014 6:59:16 GMT
So if we sue/or get compensation from Wycombe (if guilty), we basically won't get anything anyway
|
|
|
Post by Hugo Admin on Jul 25, 2014 7:05:04 GMT
So if we sue/or get compensation from Wycombe (if guilty), we basically won't get anything anyway sweet revenge?
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Jul 25, 2014 7:11:40 GMT
So if we sue/or get compensation from Wycombe (if guilty), we basically won't get anything anyway sweet revenge? maybe for some. Our problems and situation are of our own making as far as I am concerned. So seeing Wycombe potentially go bust doesn't do much for me.
I have always believed this was going to be fruitless, but we shall see
|
|
|
Post by gasincider on Jul 25, 2014 9:17:22 GMT
The man who knows said it after the meeting on Monday. Can't really be more explicit, but I think you can work it out.
|
|
|
Post by eastvilleern on Jul 25, 2014 13:29:22 GMT
So if we sue/or get compensation from Wycombe (if guilty), we basically won't get anything anyway If its seen as a Football debt and they went into Administration they'd still have to pay us out. I'm not saying it delights me' but if you don't stay within the rules of the game you cant complain for being punished afterwards. Utg
|
|