Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 19:07:17 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 19:09:27 GMT
Terrible. Terrible goal. Mildy really should have saved that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Jan 30, 2016 19:16:03 GMT
Terrible. Terrible goal. Mildy really should have saved that. I dunno. It's amazing how many times that sort of cross goes in. The last thing on the keeper's mind is that it won't be touched. Anyway, what I take away most from those highlights is 'don't try to swing on the crossbar if you're wearing woolly gloves.' |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 19:16:29 GMT
They should have scored more,missed a sitter.
Bring on the Dons. UTG
|
|
|
|
Post by surreygas on Jan 30, 2016 19:19:32 GMT
Terrible. Terrible goal. Mildy really should have saved that. You are joking aren't you? Mildenhall couldn't dive earlier as someone could have got a touch to the ball. These sort of goals happen frequently at all levels and they fool the best keepers in the world. Mildenhall also made some excellent saves and looked to have had a decent game. I wasn't at the game so only saw the highlights but based on that we were second best and Mildenhall was in no way to blame. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 19:23:12 GMT
Shocking game.
|
|
|
|
Post by justin blue on Jan 30, 2016 19:34:50 GMT
They should have scored more,missed a sitter. Bring on the Dons. UTG It certainly looks like it based on that evidence. We looked terrible, but Accrington look a good side on that clip. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 19:39:25 GMT
Terrible. Terrible goal. Mildy really should have saved that. You are joking aren't you? Mildenhall couldn't dive earlier as someone could have got a touch to the ball. These sort of goals happen frequently at all levels and they fool the best keepers in the world. Mildenhall also made some excellent saves and looked to have had a decent game. I wasn't at the game so only saw the highlights but based on that we were second best and Mildenhall was in no way to blame. I never said he didn't have a decent game. He just really should have done better with that. |
|
|
|
Post by torontogaz on Jan 30, 2016 20:14:20 GMT
BRISTOL R WINS DRAWS ACCRINGTON WINS
League 2 1 7
FA Cup 1 0 1
Total 3 1 8
the new bogey team.
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jan 30, 2016 20:34:00 GMT
What shocking goal to concede after all those decent saves, surely Parkes, or is it Lockyer?, should have made some attempt to meet the cross rather than just leave it in the hope Mildenhall would pull off a worldy?
|
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 30, 2016 20:54:43 GMT
Terrible. Terrible goal. Mildy really should have saved that. You are joking aren't you? Mildenhall couldn't dive earlier as someone could have got a touch to the ball. These sort of goals happen frequently at all levels and they fool the best keepers in the world. Mildenhall also made some excellent saves and looked to have had a decent game. I wasn't at the game so only saw the highlights but based on that we were second best and Mildenhall was in no way to blame. Didn't look like there was a lot of pace on the cross. Looked like he should have saved it, he has time to react and get across to it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 20:55:14 GMT
its all about opinions but i think mildenhall should have saved that cross,,,on the highlights they looked better than us like they did at our ground
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 21:12:13 GMT
Ball watching by Parkes and Lockyer, no attempt to deal with the cross and too late for Mildy to deal with it in my opinion.
Wish we put in more crosses like that, seen Premier keepers beaten by crosses like that fired into the "area of indecision".
|
|
|
|
Post by Strange Gas on Jan 30, 2016 21:16:59 GMT
Should have saved that, but more worryingly it looked like we didn't turn up! What happened?! Onwards
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jan 30, 2016 22:04:55 GMT
its all about opinions but i think mildenhall should have saved that cross,,,on the highlights they looked better than us like they did at our ground Out of interest how could he save it? If he'd dived early he'd have looked an idiot if a central defender had dealt with it/got a touch or a striker had got a touch, once he didn't dive early I doubt any goalie would have got near it. |
|
|
|
Post by womble on Jan 30, 2016 22:20:42 GMT
its all about opinions but i think mildenhall should have saved that cross,,,on the highlights they looked better than us like they did at our ground Out of interest how could he save it? If he'd dived early he'd have looked an idiot if a central defender had dealt with it/got a touch or a striker had got a touch, once he didn't dive early I doubt any goalie would have got near it. Have to agree with that. As the ball comes in, unless you have called for it,you have to assume the central defenders are going to deal with it and you can't anticipate the flight of the ball in case of an unexpected deflection. Once Parkes decides to leave it Mildenhall has no chance. |
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jan 30, 2016 22:37:50 GMT
its all about opinions but i think mildenhall should have saved that cross,,,on the highlights they looked better than us like they did at our ground Out of interest how could he save it? If he'd dived early he'd have looked an idiot if a central defender had dealt with it/got a touch or a striker had got a touch, once he didn't dive early I doubt any goalie would have got near it. Didn't need to dive early, it wasn't going that fast. Balls come in like that every game, it's when there is a lot of pace on it the keepers normally get beaten. |
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Jan 30, 2016 22:53:57 GMT
3 reasons I'm not surprised we lost today.
1. Were playing our bogey team.
2. Changed from our recent successful formation.
3. The team DC picked.
On to Wimbledon and hopefully Leadbitter and lines will be back in with the 3-5-2.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 23:24:21 GMT
Whoevers got Stanley playing that well deserves a medal! Made us look absolute garbage judging by that excuse for a football vid!
|
|
|
|
Post by gasincider on Jan 31, 2016 0:50:04 GMT
Stanley were really not that good. They didn't need to be. We were bloody awful, and I'm sorry to say it, but all this constant changing of the team does not help in my opinion.
By half time it was obvious that Taylor seems to have no interest in what he is there for. Wonder if he already has an agreement to go elsewhere in the summer. Lawrence didn't seem to know what his role was, and looked like a fish out of water. Bodin is completely wasted on the wing, and should either be put inside in place of Taylor or used as an impact sub. Gaffney did a hell of a lot of running as usual, but had a poor game, so I looked forward to rapid changes at the interval, because we only had to improve by 10% to turn them over.
So, what do we get? The same side reappears for the second half, and if anything we just got worse, whilst Stanley started to dominate the game. Mind you, they didn't look like scoring either. And all the while, we on the terraces just got closer and closer to hypothermia, as we had nothing to get excited about.
Then came the changes. Montano came on while I was hoping for Leadbitter to test out the Stanley defence with pace which we were crying out for. Easter came on, but Gaffney was taken off, so we still didn't get to see them together, and on came Rory Mk 11. Straight away I felt the game was gone. Taylor was still on and still just as hopeless. And so it proved.
We sank closer and closer to requiring treatment for frost bite, and as the game ended and we trudged wearily away, yet another blast of snow struck the faithful.
Sorry DC, much as we love what you have achieved, you must stop the constant tinkering. It is not going to get us where we want to be.
|
|
