|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Aug 12, 2014 21:30:46 GMT
OK, so two games in fans are already slating Clarke.
We have started off with two tough games IMO and Clarke had to change a lot in the summer on a tight ass budget. Mildenhall being out at the last minute tonight couldn't have helped preperations and from the three games I have seen so far we have looked a lot better than last season.
Let's give the guy a chance and see what he can do, hopefully the board can show him a bit more backing as well to bring more quality in.
The next 2 games are very winnable and if we get less than 4 point from those 2 then I may start to be concerned.
|
|
|
Post by Russgas on Aug 12, 2014 21:34:00 GMT
OK, so two games in fans are already slating Clarke. We have started off with two tough games IMO and Clarke had to change a lot in the summer on a tight ass budget. Mildenhall being out at the last minute tonight couldn't have helped preperations and from the three games I have seen so far we have looked a lot better than last season. Let's give the guy a chance and see what he can do, hopefully the board can show him a bit more backing as well to bring more quality in. The next 2 games are very winnable and if we get less than 4 point from those 2 then I may start to be concerned. The board should have made money available to bring some quality in during pre season .Yet another fuc k up.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2014 21:34:13 GMT
I want to give the guy a chance, infact I've been a big supporter of him, however 2 of the 4 changes absolutely baffled me tonight.
The keeper change was a given and I can completely understand Brunt not being able to go through three games in a week at this point. But why did we need to change the system and remove Parkes and Leadbitter? The back line was solid on Saturday and maintaining that would have given us our best chance of atleast a point against Barnet.
Altrincham has already turned into a very important game.
|
|
|
Post by Gas-Ed on Aug 12, 2014 21:34:12 GMT
Same people behind the scenes running operations and we thought it would be different? How stupid were we?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2014 21:43:00 GMT
Poor bloke has a sh**ty end of a stick. However, I'm interested to know why he changed 3 players, unforced, from Saturday which in turn changed 3 of our backline Inc GK.
|
|
|
Post by WeAreTheGas on Aug 12, 2014 21:45:05 GMT
I like the bloke, but he really, REALLY needs to stop chopping and changing the side/system and just let it settle.
IMO he needs to decide on his favoured formation (3-5-2/4-4-2) and lineup and stick with it for a few games.
Obviously the Mildenhall change was forced, but things I don't get from tonight:
• Playing a new CB pairing infront of the new GK. • Playing a CB at RB when a natural RB is sat on the bench. • Dropping Brunt when he held the ball up very well on Saturday and helped us keep the ball high up the pitch. • Changing the system to 4-4-2, when we looked very solid in 3-5-2 and probably needed that solidity away at a side who scored 5 on the weekend.
He doesn't help himself sometimes.
|
|
|
Post by Gas-Ed on Aug 12, 2014 21:54:26 GMT
After the tweet from the club tonight I feel really sorry for DC. His hands are tied. When Dagenham can offer players a better package you know things are bad.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2014 21:54:59 GMT
I like the bloke, but he really, REALLY needs to stop chopping and changing the side/system and just let it settle. IMO he needs to decide on his favoured formation (3-5-2/4-4-2) and lineup and stick with it for a few games. Obviously the Mildenhall change was forced, but things I don't get from tonight: • Playing a new CB pairing infront of the new GK. • Playing a CB at RB when a natural RB is sat on the bench. • Dropping Brunt when he held the ball up very well on Saturday and helped us keep the ball high up the pitch. • Changing the system to 4-4-2, when we looked very solid in 3-5-2 and probably needed that solidity away at a side who scored 5 on the weekend. He doesn't help himself sometimes. Thats because he is clueless. The same as he was last season. I will never accept he is manager of my club.He is the man who took us to hell
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2014 21:57:07 GMT
I like the bloke, but he really, REALLY needs to stop chopping and changing the side/system and just let it settle. IMO he needs to decide on his favoured formation (3-5-2/4-4-2) and lineup and stick with it for a few games. Obviously the Mildenhall change was forced, but things I don't get from tonight: • Playing a new CB pairing infront of the new GK. • Playing a CB at RB when a natural RB is sat on the bench. • Dropping Brunt when he held the ball up very well on Saturday and helped us keep the ball high up the pitch. • Changing the system to 4-4-2, when we looked very solid in 3-5-2 and probably needed that solidity away at a side who scored 5 on the weekend. He doesn't help himself sometimes. Thats because he is clueless. The same as he was last season. I will never accept he is manager of my club.He is the man who took us to hell I think that there are people within the club who are much more powerful than DC who need to shoulder the blame for that one!
|
|
|
Post by Somersetgas on Aug 12, 2014 21:59:06 GMT
I like the bloke, but he really, REALLY needs to stop chopping and changing the side/system and just let it settle. IMO he needs to decide on his favoured formation (3-5-2/4-4-2) and lineup and stick with it for a few games. Obviously the Mildenhall change was forced, but things I don't get from tonight: • Playing a new CB pairing infront of the new GK. • Playing a CB at RB when a natural RB is sat on the bench. • Dropping Brunt when he held the ball up very well on Saturday and helped us keep the ball high up the pitch. • Changing the system to 4-4-2, when we looked very solid in 3-5-2 and probably needed that solidity away at a side who scored 5 on the weekend. He doesn't help himself sometimes. Thats because he is clueless. The same as he was last season. I will never accept he is manager of my club.He is the man who took us to hell Why give a man a chance who was part of a management team who played the most negative football ever, got two lucky wins and got us relegated, he's that bad I'd have Buckle back, that is how bad he is .
|
|
|
Post by Gas-Ed on Aug 12, 2014 21:59:57 GMT
I like the bloke, but he really, REALLY needs to stop chopping and changing the side/system and just let it settle. IMO he needs to decide on his favoured formation (3-5-2/4-4-2) and lineup and stick with it for a few games. Obviously the Mildenhall change was forced, but things I don't get from tonight: • Playing a new CB pairing infront of the new GK. • Playing a CB at RB when a natural RB is sat on the bench. • Dropping Brunt when he held the ball up very well on Saturday and helped us keep the ball high up the pitch. • Changing the system to 4-4-2, when we looked very solid in 3-5-2 and probably needed that solidity away at a side who scored 5 on the weekend. He doesn't help himself sometimes. Thats because he is clueless. The same as he was last season. I will never accept he is manager of my club.He is the man who took us to hell None of the last 6 managers have been able to stop the sinking ship. How much longer can we blame the managers without looking bloody stupid?
|
|
|
Post by robroover on Aug 12, 2014 22:00:17 GMT
About time this irresponsible board became responsible and backed DC a bit more. After all, they are the ones who put us in this division!
|
|
|
Post by billygas on Aug 12, 2014 22:04:23 GMT
Poor bloke has a sh*tty end of a stick. However, I'm interested to know why he changed 3 players, unforced, from Saturday which in turn changed 3 of our backline Inc GK. MILDY WAS CHANGED THIS MORNING ......HE HAS A FAMILY MEMBER SERIOUSLY ILL IN HOSPITAL. BRUNT HASN'T GOT 3x90 MINS IN HIM JUST YET. ...THE OTHER 2 ?
|
|
|
Post by Gas-Ed on Aug 12, 2014 22:15:49 GMT
We can give him as many chances as we like but if the board don't do likewise then what is the point? Back to square one on the transfer front with the winger deemed too expensive and the striker choosing the footballing powerhouse that is Dagenham instead.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2014 23:18:46 GMT
OK, so two games in fans are already slating Clarke. We have started off with two tough games IMO and Clarke had to change a lot in the summer on a tight ass budget. Mildenhall being out at the last minute tonight couldn't have helped preperations and from the three games I have seen so far we have looked a lot better than last season. Let's give the guy a chance and see what he can do, hopefully the board can show him a bit more backing as well to bring more quality in. The next 2 games are very winnable and if we get less than 4 point from those 2 then I may start to be concerned. This seems a reasonable approach to me.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo Admin on Aug 12, 2014 23:29:27 GMT
Clarke needs to calm the f**k down in my opinion. We are trying to build a squad that can play together and too many changes screwed us tonight. Especially with players that haven't had preseason to actually play together. Very disappointed to be honest. Its all very well having players that can play in all formations but as my old man points out, in the conference it just ain't gonna happen.
Mad dog ain't subtle. He tells you how hes gonna play down the wings and get the ball in to that twat akinde and we set out with a formation that gives us zero chance of cutting out the wingers? Jesus.
Needs sorting DC and this is from one of your biggest fans. Stop trying to change so much so bloody early. 1 forced change from Saturday and you make 4. The only reason for that is tactical and the tactics were all wrong in the first half. I hope tomorrow you will admit to the mistake and we can all move on knowing it wont happen again ...
|
|
|
Post by Big Dave on Aug 12, 2014 23:30:28 GMT
OK, so two games in fans are already slating Clarke. We have started off with two tough games IMO and Clarke had to change a lot in the summer on a tight ass budget. Mildenhall being out at the last minute tonight couldn't have helped preperations and from the three games I have seen so far we have looked a lot better than last season. Let's give the guy a chance and see what he can do, hopefully the board can show him a bit more backing as well to bring more quality in. The next 2 games are very winnable and if we get less than 4 point from those 2 then I may start to be concerned. This seems a reasonable approach to me. Reasonable, perhaps...but to my mind he's already got several strikes against him. Said he'd have a squad in place before pre-season started. Fail. Used pre-season games to trial players who aren't now part of our plans, part-fail. Team not scored in 180 minutes of competitive football when our MASSIVE ISSUE last year was scoring. Fail Dropped nearly 10% of the total points Cambridge (2nd) dropped in the whole of last season in our first two games. Fail. He needs to knock one out of the park fairly soon (ie Saturday) or those tears will quickly become a sign of weakness and not strength...
|
|
|
Post by Hugo Admin on Aug 12, 2014 23:35:09 GMT
I'm of the same. I give a manager 10 points. 1 point deducted for a poor sub, 2 for a poor starting player for any given position, 3 points for a bad formation.
2 points for a good sub, 3 for a changed line up that does well and 5 points for a game changing sub/formation that salvages a point or more.
Darrell was on 1 point before half time tonight. Then recovered maybe 3.
4/10.
|
|
|
Post by Big Dave on Aug 12, 2014 23:41:36 GMT
I'm of the same. I give a manager 10 points. 1 point deducted for a poor sub, 2 for a poor starting player for any given position, 3 points for a bad formation. 2 points for a good sub, 3 for a changed line up that does well and 5 points for a game changing sub/formation that salvages a point or more. Darrell was on 1 point before half time tonight. Then recovered maybe 3. 4/10. Trouble is the league table gives him/us 3 points for a win and 1 for a draw. It's a results business and he/we have started this season exactly where we finished last season, not enough goals and not enough points...
|
|
|
Post by Hugo Admin on Aug 12, 2014 23:48:14 GMT
Dave. Don't be a dick. Reply to my PM
|
|