|
Post by wertongas on May 24, 2018 22:07:57 GMT
The application to discharge planning condition for signage has been submitted by UWE because the planning permission on this site has expired and therefore the signage condition is not required any more. This can be applied for under section 106 of the Town and Country planning act. I used to work as a senior landscape and arb officer and consultant to planning so do understand a bit about this. So basically the stadium being built on the UWE site IS DEAD IN THE WATER as Wael said it was. The club would not want to build a stadium on land they don't own as it can be open to charges by the land owner which could rise in time. This is why the owners are looking at redeveloping the Mem as they own the site and are not subject to charges. The club didn't own Eastville look what happened there rents went up and the club had to move out. why invest large sums of money into something you do not fully own?.
|
|
|
Post by cj on May 24, 2018 22:25:19 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2018 23:34:21 GMT
These little teasing posts hinting at being ITK are so annoying. Makes my blood boil. Either come out and say what you know/have heard or STFU. Please. Yea but no but.
|
|
|
Post by Severncider on May 25, 2018 1:44:35 GMT
The application to discharge planning condition for signage has been submitted by UWE because the planning permission on this site has expired and therefore the signage condition is not required any more. This can be applied for under section 106 of the Town and Country planning act. I used to work as a senior landscape and arb officer and consultant to planning so do understand a bit about this. So basically the stadium being built on the UWE site IS DEAD IN THE WATER as Wael said it was. The club would not want to build a stadium on land they don't own as it can be open to charges by the land owner which could rise in time. This is why the owners are looking at redeveloping the Mem as they own the site and are not subject to charges. The club didn't own Eastville look what happened there rents went up and the club had to move out. why invest large sums of money into something you do not fully own?. Wael said that the current owners would not be proceeding with the project.
|
|
|
Post by Gasshole on May 25, 2018 5:04:18 GMT
The application to discharge planning condition for signage has been submitted by UWE because the planning permission on this site has expired and therefore the signage condition is not required any more. This can be applied for under section 106 of the Town and Country planning act. I used to work as a senior landscape and arb officer and consultant to planning so do understand a bit about this. So basically the stadium being built on the UWE site IS DEAD IN THE WATER as Wael said it was. The club would not want to build a stadium on land they don't own as it can be open to charges by the land owner which could rise in time. This is why the owners are looking at redeveloping the Mem as they own the site and are not subject to charges. The club didn't own Eastville look what happened there rents went up and the club had to move out. why invest large sums of money into something you do not fully own?. I’ve got a spare ticket New York to Southampton if anyone’s interested. Free. Attachment Deleted
|
|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on May 25, 2018 5:49:24 GMT
The application to discharge planning condition for signage has been submitted by UWE because the planning permission on this site has expired and therefore the signage condition is not required any more. This can be applied for under section 106 of the Town and Country planning act. I used to work as a senior landscape and arb officer and consultant to planning so do understand a bit about this. So basically the stadium being built on the UWE site IS DEAD IN THE WATER as Wael said it was. The club would not want to build a stadium on land they don't own as it can be open to charges by the land owner which could rise in time. This is why the owners are looking at redeveloping the Mem as they own the site and are not subject to charges. The club didn't own Eastville look what happened there rents went up and the club had to move out. why invest large sums of money into something you do not fully own?. Wael said that the current owners would not be proceeding with the project. So are you now insinuating that the current owners are about to sell up and the new owners are going to revive the UWE?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2018 6:03:08 GMT
Wael said that the current owners would not be proceeding with the project. So are you now insinuating that the current owners are about to sell up and the new owners are going to revive the UWE? A new beginning you say?
|
|
|
Post by pucklegas on May 25, 2018 6:06:49 GMT
Nothing to see here, please move along the bus
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on May 25, 2018 6:15:18 GMT
I see the pigs are out flying again and are in a new formation - known as the bullshit passing maneuver
|
|
|
Post by philbemmygas on May 25, 2018 6:31:58 GMT
So are you now insinuating that the current owners are about to sell up and the new owners are going to revive the UWE? A new beginning you say? Here we f*cking go again. ITKers insinuating they are aware of certain facts; as was expressed earlier in this thread. Either put up or shut the f*ck up
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on May 25, 2018 6:43:29 GMT
Here we f*cking go again. ITKers insinuating they are aware of certain facts; as was expressed earlier in this thread. Either put up or shut the f*ck up Dont forget that we are all ignorant to the facts (despite there being none)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2018 6:48:55 GMT
Here we f*cking go again. ITKers insinuating they are aware of certain facts; as was expressed earlier in this thread. Either put up or shut the f*ck up Watch your blood pressure Phil 😡
|
|
|
Post by cj on May 25, 2018 9:21:52 GMT
The application to discharge planning condition for signage has been submitted by UWE because the planning permission on this site has expired and therefore the signage condition is not required any more. This can be applied for under section 106 of the Town and Country planning act. I used to work as a senior landscape and arb officer and consultant to planning so do understand a bit about this. So basically the stadium being built on the UWE site IS DEAD IN THE WATER as Wael said it was. The club would not want to build a stadium on land they don't own as it can be open to charges by the land owner which could rise in time. This is why the owners are looking at redeveloping the Mem as they own the site and are not subject to charges. The club didn't own Eastville look what happened there rents went up and the club had to move out. why invest large sums of money into something you do not fully own?. Wael said that the current owners would not be proceeding with the project. Implying new owners.
|
|
|
Post by chewbacca on May 25, 2018 9:27:57 GMT
The only person pushing a stadium for Rovers at the University retires on Thursday so I think it's done for us lads.
|
|
|
Post by A Source (aka Angry Badger) on May 25, 2018 9:41:09 GMT
Anyone out there with video editing skills. Specifically soundtracks. I'm thinking 'dead parrot'sketch with 'parrot' replaced by 'UWE'
|
|
|
Post by lpgas on May 25, 2018 16:00:04 GMT
Why would UWE want, or need a 200 room Hotel? Who do we know that owns Hotels? Are UWE trying to tempt us with PP?
|
|
|
Post by Severncider on May 25, 2018 16:20:29 GMT
Why would UWE want, or need a 200 room Hotel? Who do we know that owns Hotels? Are UWE trying to tempt us with PP? Exactly. That is why I sent the original message. Also, document DOC17/0389, originated in November 2017, mentions building the stadium. Now I am sure that this is after the date that our owners said they were no longer interested in building at UWE. Yes, universities were awash with money a few years ago, but I gather that is no longer the case and they have had to tighten their budgets.
|
|
|
Post by blueridge on May 25, 2018 16:26:50 GMT
Why would UWE want, or need a 200 room Hotel? Who do we know that owns Hotels? Are UWE trying to tempt us with PP? If I recall a hotel was included in the original outline planning application for the whole site (which included the stadium) long before the ALQ's became involved with the club.
|
|
|
Post by Parrot on May 25, 2018 16:43:59 GMT
Anyone out there with video editing skills. Specifically soundtracks. I'm thinking 'dead parrot'sketch with 'parrot' replaced by 'UWE' Im Not Dead
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on May 25, 2018 17:32:28 GMT
Why would UWE want, or need a 200 room Hotel? Who do we know that owns Hotels? Are UWE trying to tempt us with PP? Given the original plans were submitted in 2012 then I guess trying to tempt us hasn't worked do far? Original plans
|
|