Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2018 9:07:59 GMT
An interesting analysis here. Worth a read Here’s the science behind the Brexit vote and Trump’s rise | Michele Gelfand flip.it/4kc-n6 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2018 9:19:03 GMT
An interesting analysis here. Worth a read Here’s the science behind the Brexit vote and Trump’s rise | Michele Gelfand flip.it/4kc-n6I tried reading it. I can't call it interesting. I think I would learn more from watching my toenails grow. It's not science though, is it ! It's just someone's opinion. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2018 9:25:35 GMT
An interesting analysis here. Worth a read Here’s the science behind the Brexit vote and Trump’s rise | Michele Gelfand flip.it/4kc-n6I tried reading it. I can't call it interesting. I think I would learn more from watching my toenails grow. It's not science though, is it ! It's just someone's opinion. Detail obviously not your thing  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2018 9:31:41 GMT
I tried reading it. I can't call it interesting. I think I would learn more from watching my toenails grow. It's not science though, is it ! It's just someone's opinion. Detail obviously not your thing Detail? What detail? It doesn't explain anything, but is just someone's opinion....sorry, not just anyone but a professor of psychology. Get another four professor's of psychology to research the same thing and you'd probably get six different answers. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2018 10:46:38 GMT
Detail obviously not your thing Detail? What detail? It doesn't explain anything, but is just someone's opinion....sorry, not just anyone but a professor of psychology. Get another four professor's of psychology to research the same thing and you'd probably get six different answers. It's research from an academic institution. Publication of which would demand peer review, to validate it. It's an outcome of that research not an opinion. It takes no side but comes to interesting conclusion. For the life of me I can never understand why some object so much to academia. Try reading it. |
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Sept 17, 2018 11:20:26 GMT
Detail obviously not your thing Detail? What detail? It doesn't explain anything, but is just someone's opinion....sorry, not just anyone but a professor of psychology. Get another four professor's of psychology to research the same thing and you'd probably get six different answers. 1+4=5. You sure you are in banking??  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2018 11:23:20 GMT
Detail? What detail? It doesn't explain anything, but is just someone's opinion....sorry, not just anyone but a professor of psychology. Get another four professor's of psychology to research the same thing and you'd probably get six different answers. 1+4=5. You sure you are in banking?? I'm in computing...everything is 0 or 1 to me ! |
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Sept 17, 2018 11:26:07 GMT
1+4=5. You sure you are in banking?? I'm in computing...everything is 0 or 1 to me ! 01000010 01100001 01100111 01100111 01101001 01101110 01110011 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101100 01101111 01110011 01100101 01110010 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2018 11:28:45 GMT
I'm in computing...everything is 0 or 1 to me ! 01000010 01100001 01100111 01100111 01101001 01101110 01110011 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101100 01101111 01110011 01100101 01110010 BAN ! Songs are not allowed ! |
|
|
|
Post by scoobydoogas on Sept 17, 2018 11:28:56 GMT
1+4=5. You sure you are in banking?? I'm in computing...everything is 0 or 1 to me ! That's the trouble with computers. Nothing is ever yes or no in real life. Just ask Mrs Scoobydoo. |
|
|
|
Post by scoobydoogas on Sept 17, 2018 11:29:20 GMT
I'm in computing...everything is 0 or 1 to me ! 01000010 01100001 01100111 01100111 01101001 01101110 01110011 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101100 01101111 01110011 01100101 01110010 Bollox to you too!. Or have I read that wrong? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2018 11:42:30 GMT
The conclusion of that research, from an American institution, does lend weight to my opinion that the income distribution issue, compounded by austerity, was a key driver in the pro leave vote.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2018 11:52:45 GMT
The conclusion of that research, from an American institution, does lend weight to my opinion that the income distribution issue, compounded by austerity, was a key driver in the pro leave vote. Then your conclusion is obviously flawed. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2018 14:38:42 GMT
The conclusion of that research, from an American institution, does lend weight to my opinion that the income distribution issue, compounded by austerity, was a key driver in the pro leave vote. Then your conclusion is obviously flawed. As proven by?? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2018 15:41:23 GMT
Then your conclusion is obviously flawed. As proven by?? Yourself and your 'sources'. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2018 15:59:25 GMT
Yourself and your 'sources'. Ha ha. |
|
|
|
Post by aghast on Sept 17, 2018 21:15:58 GMT
I'm not much of a fan of social scientists coming up with an idea and back-fitting numbers to it to make it look like maths and real science.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Sept 17, 2018 21:21:40 GMT
I'm not much of a fan of social scientists coming up with an idea and back-fitting numbers to it to make it look like maths and real science. Guilty as charged. I came up with an idea, back-fitted it with numbers (from a text to binary translator) and made it look like I understood maths. It's says "Baggins is a loser" before you ask. |
|
|
|
Post by aghast on Sept 17, 2018 21:26:15 GMT
I'm not much of a fan of social scientists coming up with an idea and back-fitting numbers to it to make it look like maths and real science. Guilty as charged. I came up with an idea, back-fitted it with numbers (from a text to binary translator) and made it look like I understood maths. It's says "Baggins is a loser" before you ask. You got your 0s and 1s mixed up. It reads "Baggins is a tosser". Youll need to correct that. Possibly. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2018 21:46:01 GMT
I'm not much of a fan of social scientists coming up with an idea and back-fitting numbers to it to make it look like maths and real science. But did they? Or did they ask relevant questions? From your viewpoint why do you believe that people voted to leave the EU? |
|
