IS supporter wants to 'come home'

In her latest interview she said she's willing to change if we let her back - clearly suggesting to me she still holds her extremist reviews but will go through the motions of "rehabilitation" and apologies etc just to help her achieve her goal.
When Sky asked if she would let her child be taken back to the UK alone she said no, despite limited access to food and medical care in the camp. Pretty much holding the baby ransom until she gets her own way. She clearly knows the baby is her best bargaining chip and helps her get the sympathy vote.
What a vile piece of work. I'd love her to be left to rot but like I've said before she will end up back here with no real justice/punishment before commencing a life on benefits and social housing.

Should this person have had his citizenship revoked and denied a return to the UK?
If yes on what basis and how can you justify it in law?
If no, how is this person, with a proven history for being a danger to children differ from the UK citizen who went to support ISIS

www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk/2008/mar/21/ukcrime.australia

You are right my post was written poorly. You were mocking the heritage of a mans late wife not mocking the individual. I hope that helps you feel vindicated or something and not at all bigoted.

Nobody mentioned his late wife.....apart from Oldie himself.

Sorry, but I think you are being a bit sensitive here. We were just joking about how it would affect Oldie to have this terrorist supporting woman living with him. It had nothing to do with his late wife as you well know.

Wasted words I am afraid Stuart.

Offence being sought is part of the modern world and helps people take a moral high ground and aid argument. I remember Midlandgas claiming DC should be sacked because he made a quip about spending so long on his mobile phone during transfer deadline day he'd probably get a brain tumour - claiming he knew someone who had suffered what is obviously a terrible illness and that DC's clearly light hearted comment had caused great upset. Clearly using that as part of his long held desire to see the manager sacked. 
If anyone on here ever made a deliberate verbal attack on a members family, especially one who had been known to have passed away, I'd like to think they would be widely rounded on. I personally didn't see any such thing going on here. 
If it was clearly a deliberate, vindictive, personal attack I'm sure the moderators would have dished out bans or warnings? The fact they haven't perhaps tells its own story?

No Stuart. There was not a single reference to Oldie's late wife. Nothing, nada, zilch, and I'm surprised that anyone thinks I would even do that.
If someone has mis-interpreted things, then that is their problem and not mine and I do not feel I should have to apologise for someone else's mistake !

Are we not allowed to joke about Islam now?

Don't forget, once back she will demand that her husband joins her as it is her Human Right to a family life  (article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights). Hey ho, once again how do you prove he has done anything wrong? Maybe he was just the tea boy for the killers eh?