Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2019 18:22:34 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2019 18:40:36 GMT
Johnson and true colours...again Boris Johnson insults the 3.6m EU citizens who have made the UK their home flip.it/QpZpmyAnd again Kid with suspected pneumonia forced to sleep on floor Boris Johnson pockets reporter's phone when confronted with picture of boy, 4, on hospital floor flip.it/WM09dSNice article. Can you please point out where Johnson insults the EU citizens? I see it was written by a German. Can you ask him why I, as a 'EU citizen' have no voting rights in Germany? Why should he be able to vote in the UK , when I cannot vote in Germany?I As for the poor boy, what was his eventual diagnosis and what happened to him?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2019 18:46:10 GMT
You are not going to tell me the boy had flu and should never have been in A&E but home in bed are you?
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 9, 2019 18:47:49 GMT
You are not going to tell me the boy had flu and should never have been in A&E but home in bed are you? Depends on how unwell he was really doesnt it nobby. The flu does kill people each year. Particularly children and the elderly. The fact he is led next to a non-rebreather oxygen mask suggests it probably isnt just a cold even if they are using it to increase the oxygen in the air around him (some kids wont tolerate it).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2019 19:49:49 GMT
Am I watching a different video, I'm sure I hear Mr Johnson say "Its a terrible, terrible photo, and I apologise to the families and all those who have terrible experiences in the NHS" whilst holding the phone.
Didn't quite ignore it did he.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 9, 2019 19:58:07 GMT
Am I watching a different video, I'm sure I hear Mr Johnson say "Its a terrible, terrible photo, and I apologise to the families and all those who have terrible experiences in the NHS" whilst holding the phone. Didn't quite ignore it did he. After refusing to look at it then pocketing the phone then getting called out on the above sequence and pulling it back out again you mean? Yes he did.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2019 19:58:57 GMT
Johnson and true colours...again Boris Johnson insults the 3.6m EU citizens who have made the UK their home flip.it/QpZpmyAnd again Kid with suspected pneumonia forced to sleep on floor Boris Johnson pockets reporter's phone when confronted with picture of boy, 4, on hospital floor flip.it/WM09dSThe interview where he took the phone and recited his lines on the NHS was just...
No Sympathy, No Empathy, No Humanity.
A man just trying to hide from the past 9 years of Tory rule and portray himself as the solution with no ownership of the past (Whether he was directly involved or not). Truly reprehensible
Inviting IRA members into parliament a couple of weeks after they tried to murder the whole government and wipeout any innocent bystanders. No sympathy. No Empathy. No Humanity.
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Dec 9, 2019 20:00:15 GMT
IDS only has a majority of around 2,500. Raab would be something big as his majority id like 20,000, but reckon that could be close as it really seems very few people like the f**ker There is no way a majority of 20,000 would be overturned. Normally I’d agree but Raab has jarred lots of his constituents off by his sense of entitlement, his apparent more interest in himself rather than them, the Harry Dunn affair and how he dealt with it. Esher is a big remain area and his right wing approach has put many off. People seem to think there’s real chance of an upset. Perhaps it won’t happen but that’s the whole point about “Portillo-moments” no one expects them to happen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2019 20:01:36 GMT
You are not going to tell me the boy had flu and should never have been in A&E but home in bed are you? Depends on how unwell he was really doesnt it nobby. The flu does kill people each year. Particularly children and the elderly. The fact he is led next to a non-rebreather oxygen mask suggests it probably isnt just a cold even if they are using it to increase the oxygen in the air around him (some kids wont tolerate it). Are you suggesting every child that has the flu should go to A&E? Seriously?
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Dec 9, 2019 20:02:08 GMT
Am I watching a different video, I'm sure I hear Mr Johnson say "Its a terrible, terrible photo, and I apologise to the families and all those who have terrible experiences in the NHS" whilst holding the phone. Didn't quite ignore it did he. Its the fact he took the phone of the interviewer so he could regurgitate his buzz words and lines first and foremost that sticks in the throat. Repeat the mantra was above tackling the question before him What a leader
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 9, 2019 20:05:06 GMT
Depends on how unwell he was really doesnt it nobby. The flu does kill people each year. Particularly children and the elderly. The fact he is led next to a non-rebreather oxygen mask suggests it probably isnt just a cold even if they are using it to increase the oxygen in the air around him (some kids wont tolerate it). Are you suggesting every child that has the flu should go to A&E? Seriously? You really are a tryhard aren't you. I'll help you out and say it again. Depends. On. How. Unwell. He. Was. Personally, I'd recommend the hypoxic ones with suspected pneumonia are probably worthy candidates but then again what do I know...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2019 20:07:52 GMT
Am I watching a different video, I'm sure I hear Mr Johnson say "Its a terrible, terrible photo, and I apologise to the families and all those who have terrible experiences in the NHS" whilst holding the phone. Didn't quite ignore it did he. Its the fact he took the phone of the interviewer so he could regurgitate his buzz words and lines first and foremost that sticks in the throat. Repeat the mantra was above tackling the question before him What a leader To be honest you cannot expect any PM to be responsible for each and every person. The real questions should be asked of that Trust's management of their department.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2019 20:10:13 GMT
Are you suggesting every child that has the flu should go to A&E? Seriously? You really are a tryhard aren't you. I'll help you out and say it again. Depends. On. How. Unwell. He. Was. Personally, I'd recommend the hypoxic ones with suspected pneumonia are probably worthy candidates but then again what do I know... He had the flu. What is the full story here?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2019 20:17:20 GMT
Does it come down to a simple choice of chasing one and not the other? If there was no investigation and pursuit of benefit crooks what do you think would happen? Obviously more people would try and obtain money for nothing. I’ve no idea what their exact budget is but HMRC are pretty notorious for investigating non payment of tax and won’t let you get away with it. If you’re talking about perfectly legal tax avoidance that is a different matter and is for the politicians to sort out. Just for the record, I am not defending benefit cheats. Its just very strange that the tabloids are quick to pounce on 'scroungers' when those who evade tax are left well alone by the media. Its like there's some kind of respect for those who 'get away with it' by not paying tax. But my real point is that the amount we lose in benefit fraud (about £2 billion per year) is very small compared to tax evasion (about £35 billion per year) - so makes more financial sense to put more resources into chasing the tax evaders. In case you want a source: fullfact.org/online/comparing-benefit-and-tax-fraud/Is that £35 billion quote 100% due to illegal tax evasion or just a headline grabbing figure? Whether it’s a correct figure or not any money that HMRC and the taxpayer are deprived of should be hunted down. Any that is lost through perfectly legal avoidance schemes needs to be addressed by government whoever that may be. Does anyone think tax avoidance only came in to being when the conservatives came to government. Amazing how they got away with introducing such schemes when the previous labour government had closed every single tax loophole! As for the £2 billion from benefit fraud how many nurses and doctors could you get for that? I keep hearing about Tory austerity but at the same time there seems no appetite to stop the public purse bleeding billions of pounds. The left may not want to believe benefit fraud happens but it obviously does and it is costing us billions which we cannot afford to just brush under the carpet because of political beliefs.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 9, 2019 20:22:39 GMT
You really are a tryhard aren't you. I'll help you out and say it again. Depends. On. How. Unwell. He. Was. Personally, I'd recommend the hypoxic ones with suspected pneumonia are probably worthy candidates but then again what do I know... He had the flu. What is the full story here? Well given he was under the care of a GP and either deteriorated or didnt improve they likely sent him in to the nearest place that has a paediatrician and most likely for a septic screen. Stuff you send children in to A&E for basically.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2019 20:26:56 GMT
In other news, the sky is blue.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2019 20:27:52 GMT
The interview where he took the phone and recited his lines on the NHS was just...
No Sympathy, No Empathy, No Humanity.
A man just trying to hide from the past 9 years of Tory rule and portray himself as the solution with no ownership of the past (Whether he was directly involved or not). Truly reprehensible
Inviting IRA members into parliament a couple of weeks after they tried to murder the whole government and wipeout any innocent bystanders. No sympathy. No Empathy. No Humanity. Maria Gatland
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2019 20:30:13 GMT
Just for the record, I am not defending benefit cheats. Its just very strange that the tabloids are quick to pounce on 'scroungers' when those who evade tax are left well alone by the media. Its like there's some kind of respect for those who 'get away with it' by not paying tax. But my real point is that the amount we lose in benefit fraud (about £2 billion per year) is very small compared to tax evasion (about £35 billion per year) - so makes more financial sense to put more resources into chasing the tax evaders. In case you want a source: fullfact.org/online/comparing-benefit-and-tax-fraud/Its one rule for one and one for another. Those on low incomes branded cheats and scroungers. Those on high are just legally doing what they can and the government isnt doing enough. Likelihood is that you can probably apply that to low income claimants too, but they dont. As for chasing the biggest impact, clearly we know which one you would go for. You are right there is one rule for one and one rule for the other. Deliberate cheating and fraudulent claiming of benefit funded by hardworking taxpayers is ILLEGAL. Avoiding paying more tax than you otherwise would have done by using by existing, legitimate tax laws is LEGAL. So bizarrely two different sets of circumstances are viewed differently. Funny old world. In other news a low income individual commits an armed robbery and gets five years in prison. A wealthy banker forgets to pay his tv license and gets a small fine. What a disgusting society. Two criminals sentenced according to their class. One rule for rich, one rule for the poor.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Barbrady on Dec 9, 2019 20:31:38 GMT
Its one rule for one and one for another. Those on low incomes branded cheats and scroungers. Those on high are just legally doing what they can and the government isnt doing enough. Likelihood is that you can probably apply that to low income claimants too, but they dont. As for chasing the biggest impact, clearly we know which one you would go for. You are right there is one rule for one and one rule for the other. Deliberate cheating and fraudulent claiming of benefit funded by hardworking taxpayers is ILLEGAL. Avoiding paying more tax than you otherwise would have done by using by existing, legitimate tax laws is LEGAL. So bizarrely two different sets of circumstances are viewed differently. Funny old world. In other news a low income individual commits an armed robbery and gets five years in prison. A wealthy banker forgets to pay his tv license and gets a small fine. What a disgusting society. Two criminals sentenced according to their class. One rule for rich, one rule for the poor. But if it were fraudulent Eric they would surely be getting prosecuted wouldnt they?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2019 20:36:59 GMT
He had the flu. What is the full story here? Well given he was under the care of a GP and either deteriorated or didnt improve they likely sent him in to the nearest place that has a paediatrician and most likely for a septic screen. Stuff you send children in to A&E for basically. So his GP sent him to A&E when all he had was the flu?.....on a Saturday night.
|
|