yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,452
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Feb 22, 2020 14:32:02 GMT
Worried about Rollin at right back. He’s looked vulnerable there and turns like the titanic.
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Feb 22, 2020 14:35:10 GMT
Worried about Rollin at right back. He’s looked vulnerable there and turns like the titanic. I think it’ll be Kilgour at right back. He hasn’t done badly when played there to be fair.
|
|
|
Post by Rod1883 on Feb 22, 2020 14:36:01 GMT
Worried about Rollin at right back. He’s looked vulnerable there and turns like the titanic. Could get destroyed by Gooch/ONien/Hume Still think a back 5 would have been better
|
|
|
Post by endicotton on Feb 22, 2020 14:38:58 GMT
So is that a back 4 with Alfie or Rollin at full back? I really hoped we would go for a back 5 today I'm guessing Kilgour at RB, think the manager would see him as being more composed on the ball than Menayese.
|
|
Marshy
Proper Gas
Posts: 14,385
|
Post by Marshy on Feb 22, 2020 14:42:33 GMT
So is that a back 4 with Alfie or Rollin at full back? I really hoped we would go for a back 5 today I'm guessing Kilgour at RB, think the manager would see him as being more composed on the ball than Menayese. Yes I hope so, Mayo at right back will get spread all over the place!
|
|
|
Post by axegas on Feb 22, 2020 14:43:44 GMT
So is that a back 4 with Alfie or Rollin at full back? I really hoped we would go for a back 5 today I'm guessing Kilgour at RB, think the manager would see him as being more composed on the ball than Menayese. Can’t say I’m enthusiastic about our defence today tbh. Leahy at left back, Craig who isn’t great in a back four, Kilgour out of position and Menayese who has got the odd mistake in him. Inb4 we get a clean sheet at the stadium of light.
|
|
|
Post by gashead1981 on Feb 22, 2020 14:47:24 GMT
Or is a back 3 of Rollin Craig Kilgour and leahy and Ginelly on the flanks/WB.
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Feb 22, 2020 14:50:38 GMT
Or is a back 3 of Rollin Craig Kilgour and leahy and Ginelly on the flanks/WB. I’d prefer that for this game but Garner seems to favour the 4-3-3
|
|
|
Post by markczgas on Feb 22, 2020 14:52:16 GMT
Worried about Rollin at right back. He’s looked vulnerable there and turns like the titanic. Could get destroyed by Gooch/ONien/Hume Still think a back 5 would have been better you mean fly the white flag ?
|
|
|
Post by markczgas on Feb 22, 2020 14:53:48 GMT
I'm guessing Kilgour at RB, think the manager would see him as being more composed on the ball than Menayese. Can’t say I’m enthusiastic about our defence today tbh. Leahy at left back, Craig who isn’t great in a back four, Kilgour out of position and Menayese who has got the odd mistake in him. Inb4 we get a clean sheet at the stadium of light. Craig isn't great ?? since when ? Kilgour has done well wherever he's played too. Being negative here Axe.
|
|
|
Post by markczgas on Feb 22, 2020 14:55:57 GMT
Nice to see Mitchell - Lawson and Ginnelly start - bench looks stronger again and nice to see Harries and Daly looking set. We are likely to get beat today but it's good to see the manager put out some exciting players with pace and as you said - really good to see Daly and Harries make the bench. I presume Little is injured ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2020 14:56:58 GMT
Could get destroyed by Gooch/ONien/Hume Still think a back 5 would have been better you mean fly the white flag ? Exactly. This line up has pace up top, perfect for an away game on the break. If we get tonked so be it, most people have written us off already anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Rod1883 on Feb 22, 2020 14:59:29 GMT
Could get destroyed by Gooch/ONien/Hume Still think a back 5 would have been better you mean fly the white flag ? Not sure what you mean? I'm just saying that for this game, at their place, with their fast wingers, a back 5 imho would be better.
|
|
|
Post by markczgas on Feb 22, 2020 15:04:13 GMT
you mean fly the white flag ? Not sure what you mean? I'm just saying that for this game, at their place, with their fast wingers, a back 5 imho would be better. it suggests you want us to have loads of players at the back - so a focus on keeping them out rather than taking the game to them. Sunderland are no doubt a string team but they haven't been setting the league alight. We won our last game so hopefully the manager is thinking lets play to win and not to contain. Think in all likelihood we are going to lose but we can at least give it a go from the start - it might knock Sunderland off-guard.
|
|
|
Post by axegas on Feb 22, 2020 15:05:30 GMT
Can’t say I’m enthusiastic about our defence today tbh. Leahy at left back, Craig who isn’t great in a back four, Kilgour out of position and Menayese who has got the odd mistake in him. Inb4 we get a clean sheet at the stadium of light. Craig isn't great ?? since when ? Kilgour has done well wherever he's played too. Being negative here Axe. Yes a bit negative, I like Craig, he’s an experienced head that’s done well for us over the last couple of years. However since Garner has come in, we’ve switched from a 5 at the back to a 4 and he hasn’t done well there. Would have preferred a back 5 with THD and Rodman as wingbacks today but we’ll see.
|
|
|
Post by Rod1883 on Feb 22, 2020 15:05:49 GMT
Not sure what you mean? I'm just saying that for this game, at their place, with their fast wingers, a back 5 imho would be better. it suggests you want us to have loads of players at the back - so a focus on keeping them out rather than taking the game to them. Sunderland are no doubt a string team but they haven't been setting the league alight. We won our last game so hopefully the manager is thinking lets play to win and not to contain. Think in all likelihood we are going to lose but we can at least give it a go from the start - it might knock Sunderland off-guard. Fair enough - hope you are right UTG
|
|
|
Post by gregsy on Feb 22, 2020 15:06:13 GMT
Well 5 mins in and no obligatory ffs post from cantankerous....
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Feb 22, 2020 15:08:25 GMT
Encouraging start.
|
|
|
Post by Rod1883 on Feb 22, 2020 15:10:44 GMT
Leahy's going to have to be careful for 80 odd minutes now
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2020 15:19:57 GMT
Cant see Leahy lasting 90 minutes here …. Fair play to him he does have a good go!!
Sweepstake on him or the Captain to get sent off today.
|
|