|
Post by Gastafari on Feb 19, 2021 23:59:35 GMT
I believe Lyle Taylor has come out with something similar recently as well. He's been pretty much lambasted for it too. There's plenty of Black people who agree with them as well. We all want to tackle racism, but you don't have to agree with BLM the organisation and the people behind it. BLM the organisation seem to want to pick and choose what Black lives actually matter just to fit the agenda. I've mentioned this before months ago on this thread, BLM don't seem to care about the hundreds of Black people killing eachother every day in places like Baltimore, Philadelphia, Chicago, Detroit, Milwaukee, St Louis etc They don't seem to care about the amount of Black babies being aborted through Planned Parenthood. They don't seem to care about other things happening across the globe, i.e in Ethiopa right now where thousands have been massacred and millions having to flee their homes. Do these Black lives not matter? Or is that you just care about certain ones that fit into an agenda? The problem is, I don't think that's true. Your argument here is looking at the situation the wrong way round. It's easy to look at any organisation who focus on let's say 10% and say 'you're not doing enough'. But what we should be doing is applauding them for attempting to help the 10%. What does 99% of the country on here do to help end racism? Sit on a forum and moan about BLM? I bet its working wonders. What are BLM doing? They've got a snappy slogan which has been hash tagged to death, great publicity absolutely, and people then come out and say it's got nothing to do with the organisation. Absolute b*llocks. Their main aims, Dismantling Capitalism, Defunding the Police and disrupting the nuclear family will affect Black communities more than anybody else. When Black people speak out about it, or have a difference of opinion they then get lambasted by the so called 'Anti-racist, wannabe Social Justice Warrior brigade' which also makes a mockery! It's as if they think Black people can't think for themselves or something? If you want to support BLM the organisation or the 'Movement' then fine, but likewise accept the fact that others can see write through it.
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Feb 20, 2021 0:11:02 GMT
The problem is, I don't think that's true. Your argument here is looking at the situation the wrong way round. It's easy to look at any organisation who focus on let's say 10% and say 'you're not doing enough'. But what we should be doing is applauding them for attempting to help the 10%. What does 99% of the country on here do to help end racism? Sit on a forum and moan about BLM? I bet its working wonders. What are BLM doing? They've got a snappy slogan which has been hash tagged to death, great publicity absolutely, and people then come out and say it's got nothing to do with the organisation. Absolute b*llocks. Their main aims, Dismantling Capitalism, Defunding the Police and disrupting the nuclear family will affect Black communities more than anybody else. When Black people speak out about it, or have a difference of opinion they then get lambasted by the so called 'Anti-racist, wannabe Social Justice Warrior brigade' which also makes a mockery! It's as if they think Black people can't think for themselves or something? If you want to support BLM the organisation or the 'Movement' then fine, but likewise accept the fact that others can see write through it. Main objectives, or just the objectives you want to focus on to suit your argument? People who also speak out against it also get massive support as well, you are aware? Or do you only focus on the things you disagree with? From the main objectives point you tried to make, I think I know the answer. If you actually bothered to look instead of having a default attack position, you'd see that BLM UK actually supported Zaha, but that wouldn't suit the point you're trying to make, would it? As for black people thinking for themselves, I'm not really sure what you're going on about. I don't support the entirety of the BLM movement, but I support it's core principle that I do support in equality and ending racism. I also accept that you don't want to support BLM and will ridicule it for anything it does. If you want to consider that as "seeing write through it" then be my guest, but lose the patronising tone with me, thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Gastafari on Feb 20, 2021 0:46:47 GMT
What are BLM doing? They've got a snappy slogan which has been hash tagged to death, great publicity absolutely, and people then come out and say it's got nothing to do with the organisation. Absolute b*llocks. Their main aims, Dismantling Capitalism, Defunding the Police and disrupting the nuclear family will affect Black communities more than anybody else. When Black people speak out about it, or have a difference of opinion they then get lambasted by the so called 'Anti-racist, wannabe Social Justice Warrior brigade' which also makes a mockery! It's as if they think Black people can't think for themselves or something? If you want to support BLM the organisation or the 'Movement' then fine, but likewise accept the fact that others can see write through it. Main objectives, or just the objectives you want to focus on to suit your argument? Pretty much what BLM do. Case closed. I've listed a whole host of examples going right back on this thread. BLM UK also make a mockery of it all, goes back to the hash tag point. They all use the same slogan, same banner etc, yet only in fine small print do they mention that they have no affiliations with UK BLM on Social Media, or BLM the organisation. They're all confused themselves, let alone to everybody else. BLM the organisation, UK BLM and BLM UK. All claiming to be different entities. Very convenient. It's all a sham, whether one of them agrees with Zaha or not.
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Feb 20, 2021 1:01:06 GMT
Main objectives, or just the objectives you want to focus on to suit your argument? Pretty much what BLM do. Case closed. I've listed a whole host of examples going right back on this thread. BLM UK also make a mockery of it all, goes back to the hash tag point. They all use the same slogan, same banner etc, yet only in fine small print do they mention that they have no affiliations with UK BLM on Social Media, or BLM the organisation. They're all confused themselves, let alone to everybody else. BLM the organisation, UK BLM and BLM UK. All claiming to be different entities. Very convenient. It's all a sham, whether one of them agrees with Zaha or not. Insightful post. Couldn't really answer a single point, go into your default attack mode.
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Feb 20, 2021 1:13:04 GMT
Weird the way some people get so wound up by BLM but let other things slip their conscience. Odd lot 😃
|
|
|
Post by Gastafari on Feb 20, 2021 2:20:44 GMT
Pretty much what BLM do. Case closed. I've listed a whole host of examples going right back on this thread. BLM UK also make a mockery of it all, goes back to the hash tag point. They all use the same slogan, same banner etc, yet only in fine small print do they mention that they have no affiliations with UK BLM on Social Media, or BLM the organisation. They're all confused themselves, let alone to everybody else. BLM the organisation, UK BLM and BLM UK. All claiming to be different entities. Very convenient. It's all a sham, whether one of them agrees with Zaha or not. Insightful post. Couldn't really answer a single point, go into your default attack mode. I've answered every single one of them, months ago on this very thread. As opposed to your default defence mode? I've been very clear on everything on this thread from false victimhood, the myth of Systemic racism, the Oxymorons within organisations likr BLM, the false agendas, the hypocrisy and just the sheer nonsense of it all. Yes we can all agree that unfortunately racism exists, I've been on the end of it myself. There will always be racists from all colours and creeds, from all parts of the globe, there's prejudices and certain people from certain races, creeds, faiths and ideologies that dislike eachother. That doesn't mean that I have to agree with the majority of nonsense that BLM, UKBLM or BLM UK spout which people lap up, because they want to be seen as 'Righteous' and it makes them feel better about themselves. You can be Anti-Racist, Black, Asian or whatever and still believe BLM in all it's guises is a complete sham. Its not mutually exclusive.
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Feb 20, 2021 2:46:36 GMT
Insightful post. Couldn't really answer a single point, go into your default attack mode. I've answered every single one of them, months ago on this very thread. As opposed to your default defence mode? I've been very clear on everything on this thread from false victimhood, the myth of Systemic racism, the Oxymorons within organisations likr BLM, the false agendas, the hypocrisy and just the sheer nonsense of it all. Yes we can all agree that unfortunately racism exists, I've been on the end of it myself. There will always be racists from all colours and creeds, from all parts of the globe, there's prejudices and certain people from certain races, creeds, faiths and ideologies that dislike eachother. That doesn't mean that I have to agree with the majority of nonsense that BLM, UKBLM or BLM UK spout which people lap up, because they want to be seen as 'Righteous' and it makes them feel better about themselves. You can be Anti-Racist, Black, Asian or whatever and still believe BLM in all it's guises is a complete sham. Its not mutually exclusive. Thats a convenient answer - 'I will ignore any point you make because I've said it once in the past 112 pages. But instead of potentially repeating myself (debatable), i'll just repeat the same points that suit my arguments over and over again - because I know you won't go through 112 pages worth to show that I have or haven't answered it'. Make sense of that. I'm not being on defence mode, I said I don't agree with everything they do and that I agree with equality and the abolishment of racism as their core principle. Do you think thats defensive? Is that wrong of me? I'd love to hear your thoughts why. On your last point, no one is saying they're mutually exclusive, you're making up arguments and then trying to drive that point home as if its my position to defend, when it's not.. Of course, if you can show me here where I or someone has said they're mutually exclusive, I'd be happy to be proved wrong.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2021 10:53:59 GMT
Wilfried zaha has commented that taking a knee has become an empty gesture now as nothing has changed, and it's time to try something else. Very interesting that it seems racists have taken his comments as a win against BLM. And that anti-racists would be fully behind him if there is a genuine plan to tackle racism. I believe Lyle Taylor has come out with something similar recently as well. He's been pretty much lambasted for it too. There's plenty of Black people who agree with them as well. We all want to tackle racism, but you don't have to agree with BLM the organisation and the people behind it. BLM the organisation seem to want to pick and choose what Black lives actually matter just to fit the agenda. I've mentioned this before months ago on this thread, BLM don't seem to care about the hundreds of Black people killing eachother every day in places like Baltimore, Philadelphia, Chicago, Detroit, Milwaukee, St Louis etc They don't seem to care about the amount of Black babies being aborted through Planned Parenthood. They don't seem to care about other things happening across the globe, i.e in Ethiopa right now where thousands have been massacred and millions having to flee their homes. Do these Black lives not matter? Or is that you just care about certain ones that fit into an agenda? Social engineering in the US. You never answered why black people in America are killing each other at frightening rates. If you are struggling to see a difference between the USA situation and violence in Africa then perhaps the situation is over your head.
|
|
|
Post by Gastafari on Feb 20, 2021 12:44:38 GMT
I believe Lyle Taylor has come out with something similar recently as well. He's been pretty much lambasted for it too. There's plenty of Black people who agree with them as well. We all want to tackle racism, but you don't have to agree with BLM the organisation and the people behind it. BLM the organisation seem to want to pick and choose what Black lives actually matter just to fit the agenda. I've mentioned this before months ago on this thread, BLM don't seem to care about the hundreds of Black people killing eachother every day in places like Baltimore, Philadelphia, Chicago, Detroit, Milwaukee, St Louis etc They don't seem to care about the amount of Black babies being aborted through Planned Parenthood. They don't seem to care about other things happening across the globe, i.e in Ethiopa right now where thousands have been massacred and millions having to flee their homes. Do these Black lives not matter? Or is that you just care about certain ones that fit into an agenda? Social engineering in the US. You never answered why black people in America are killing each other at frightening rates. If you are struggling to see a difference between the USA situation and violence in Africa then perhaps the situation is over your head. Yes I did answer why Black people are killing themselves at alarming rates. I talked about it in great detail actually, way back months ago on this exact thread. Blaming it on racism, oppression and the "Legacy of slavery" is absolute nonsnsense. You just have to look at the facts and it tells you all you need to know. If it really was down to oppression and the legacy of slavery then ask yourself why 50-100 years after slavery was abolished Blacks were doing better economically, they weren't killing eachother, and the housing projects weren't full of murders and crime? This was also when Blacks actually were oppressed and were living under Jim Crow laws. The Welfare state has a lot to answer for, which has devastated the Nuclear Family structure where the majoriry of Black kids are born into single parent families with no Fathers around compared to the complete opposite of 50-100 years after slavery. BLM want to keep it this way, they openly state they want to continue to disrupt the nuclear family structure which is already crippling the Black Communities. BLM couldn't care less about the majority of Black lives. They pick and choose what Black lives actually matter just to suit their agenda. It's a complete sham.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2021 15:30:43 GMT
Social engineering in the US. You never answered why black people in America are killing each other at frightening rates. If you are struggling to see a difference between the USA situation and violence in Africa then perhaps the situation is over your head. Yes I did answer why Black people are killing themselves at alarming rates. I talked about it in great detail actually, way back months ago on this exact thread. Blaming it on racism, oppression and the "Legacy of slavery" is absolute nonsnsense. You just have to look at the facts and it tells you all you need to know. If it really was down to oppression and the legacy of slavery then ask yourself why 50-100 years after slavery was abolished Blacks were doing better economically, they weren't killing eachother, and the housing projects weren't full of murders and crime? This was also when Blacks actually were oppressed and were living under Jim Crow laws. The Welfare state has a lot to answer for, which has devastated the Nuclear Family structure where the majoriry of Black kids are born into single parent families with no Fathers around compared to the complete opposite of 50-100 years after slavery. BLM want to keep it this way, they openly state they want to continue to disrupt the nuclear family structure which is already crippling the Black Communities. BLM couldn't care less about the majority of Black lives. They pick and choose what Black lives actually matter just to suit their agenda. It's a complete sham. That's your own personal politics rather than the problem at hand. Don't see the so called free market libertarians helping the racial issue, quite the opposite.
|
|
|
Post by Gastafari on Feb 20, 2021 15:39:33 GMT
Yes I did answer why Black people are killing themselves at alarming rates. I talked about it in great detail actually, way back months ago on this exact thread. Blaming it on racism, oppression and the "Legacy of slavery" is absolute nonsnsense. You just have to look at the facts and it tells you all you need to know. If it really was down to oppression and the legacy of slavery then ask yourself why 50-100 years after slavery was abolished Blacks were doing better economically, they weren't killing eachother, and the housing projects weren't full of murders and crime? This was also when Blacks actually were oppressed and were living under Jim Crow laws. The Welfare state has a lot to answer for, which has devastated the Nuclear Family structure where the majoriry of Black kids are born into single parent families with no Fathers around compared to the complete opposite of 50-100 years after slavery. BLM want to keep it this way, they openly state they want to continue to disrupt the nuclear family structure which is already crippling the Black Communities. BLM couldn't care less about the majority of Black lives. They pick and choose what Black lives actually matter just to suit their agenda. It's a complete sham. That's your own personal politics rather than the problem at hand. Don't see the so called free market libertarians helping the racial issue, quite the opposite. It's nothing to do with personal politics. It's everything to do with facts. Facts will always quash feelings, false sentiments and victimhood.
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Feb 20, 2021 15:52:23 GMT
That's your own personal politics rather than the problem at hand. Don't see the so called free market libertarians helping the racial issue, quite the opposite. It's nothing to do with personal politics. It's everything to do with facts. Facts will always quash feelings, false sentiments and victimhood. They’re your opinions, not facts.
|
|
|
Post by Gastafari on Feb 20, 2021 16:03:58 GMT
It's nothing to do with personal politics. It's everything to do with facts. Facts will always quash feelings, false sentiments and victimhood. They’re your opinions, not facts. No, they're 100% stone wall facts.
|
|
|
Post by yattongas on Feb 20, 2021 16:24:04 GMT
They’re your opinions, not facts. No, they're 100% stone wall facts. Well there’s no point debating with someone with a closed mind . Just because you believe something doesn’t make it a fact, although I’m sure you know this really.
|
|
|
Post by Gastafari on Feb 20, 2021 16:36:57 GMT
No, they're 100% stone wall facts. Well there’s no point debating with someone with a closed mind . Just because you believe something doesn’t make it a fact, although I’m sure you know this really. Indeed. I agree 100%. However in this instance they are 100%, undeniable, stone wall facts.
|
|
|
Post by stuartcampbell on Mar 12, 2021 4:56:39 GMT
Remember when people were claiming "everyone thinks what the officer did was wrong," and "no one is defending it."
Look at the responses and comments to these:
By the way, looking increasingly likely Chauvin is going to get an extremely small sentence.
But yes, there is absolutely no issue of systemic racism whatsoever.
When people try and do whataboutism I ask a simple question. Name an American black man who murdered a white man because he was white and got away with it.
There are none. But the list of white men who murder black men due to their skin colour and get away with it grows longer by the day.
This is people's issue. Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, will try and justify a man's death who had a knee on his neck for 8 minutes, which almost all police officers have condemned, where all autopsies on the matter concluded it was a homicide.
I'm just bewildered hundreds of thousands of people are defending Chauvin's actions.
|
|
|
Post by Gastafari on Mar 19, 2021 23:08:56 GMT
Remember when people were claiming "everyone thinks what the officer did was wrong," and "no one is defending it." Look at the responses and comments to these: By the way, looking increasingly likely Chauvin is going to get an extremely small sentence. But yes, there is absolutely no issue of systemic racism whatsoever. When people try and do whataboutism I ask a simple question. Name an American black man who murdered a white man because he was white and got away with it. There are none. But the list of white men who murder black men due to their skin colour and get away with it grows longer by the day. This is people's issue. Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, will try and justify a man's death who had a knee on his neck for 8 minutes, which almost all police officers have condemned, where all autopsies on the matter concluded it was a homicide. I'm just bewildered hundreds of thousands of people are defending Chauvin's actions. That's a massive assumption. There's been plenty murders by all races and creeds where they "have got away with it". A few high profile ones, where Black people have got away with murder. OJ Simpson, a prime example. Is there any concrete evidence and proof that George Floyd died due to Chauvins actions, all because Floyd was Black? Of course people want to see it that way, and make every thing about Racism, even if there isn't any proof. I am not saying Chauvin isn't a racist cop, he may well be, but there is no proof.
|
|
|
Post by stuartcampbell on Mar 28, 2021 4:25:10 GMT
Remember when people were claiming "everyone thinks what the officer did was wrong," and "no one is defending it." Look at the responses and comments to these: By the way, looking increasingly likely Chauvin is going to get an extremely small sentence. But yes, there is absolutely no issue of systemic racism whatsoever. When people try and do whataboutism I ask a simple question. Name an American black man who murdered a white man because he was white and got away with it. There are none. But the list of white men who murder black men due to their skin colour and get away with it grows longer by the day. This is people's issue. Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, will try and justify a man's death who had a knee on his neck for 8 minutes, which almost all police officers have condemned, where all autopsies on the matter concluded it was a homicide. I'm just bewildered hundreds of thousands of people are defending Chauvin's actions. That's a massive assumption. There's been plenty murders by all races and creeds where they "have got away with it". A few high profile ones, where Black people have got away with murder. OJ Simpson, a prime example. Is there any concrete evidence and proof that George Floyd died due to Chauvins actions, all because Floyd was Black? Of course people want to see it that way, and make every thing about Racism, even if there isn't any proof. I am not saying Chauvin isn't a racist cop, he may well be, but there is no proof. Just seen this Gastafari; apologies for the delay. Also you missed a key word in my phrasing Gastafari, because of their race. I think any rational person would probably conclude that Mr. Simpson did not act in the way that he did because of contempt for the colour of his ex-wife and Ron Goldman. Although I'm not sure OJ did actually do it in all honesty, I've always been convinced his son Jason was responsible. If you're referring to the evidence Floyd dying due to Chauvin's actions; I would probably refer to both autopsies concluding George Floyd died to "homicide caused by asphyxia due to neck and back compression that led to a lack of blood flow to the brain" And because he was black? Intent is obviously almost impossible to prove, but I'd probably refer you to Chauvin's history of excessive force towards people who were ethnic minorities. I think most people could conclude that, but it's more highlighting a straw that broke the camel's back kind of issue. There is huge well-documented and researched biases and disparities in terms of sentencing, stops, searches and arrests, biases from judges, juries and prosecutors, death penalty sentencing and implicit bias. I can refer you to any of those at your request. I think a rational person could conclude these disparities were due to racist beliefs, whether conscious or unconscious.
|
|
|
Post by Gastafari on Mar 29, 2021 16:16:56 GMT
That's a massive assumption. There's been plenty murders by all races and creeds where they "have got away with it". A few high profile ones, where Black people have got away with murder. OJ Simpson, a prime example. Is there any concrete evidence and proof that George Floyd died due to Chauvins actions, all because Floyd was Black? Of course people want to see it that way, and make every thing about Racism, even if there isn't any proof. I am not saying Chauvin isn't a racist cop, he may well be, but there is no proof. Just seen this Gastafari; apologies for the delay. Also you missed a key word in my phrasing Gastafari, because of their race. I think any rational person would probably conclude that Mr. Simpson did not act in the way that he did because of contempt for the colour of his ex-wife and Ron Goldman. Although I'm not sure OJ did actually do it in all honesty, I've always been convinced his son Jason was responsible. If you're referring to the evidence Floyd dying due to Chauvin's actions; I would probably refer to both autopsies concluding George Floyd died to "homicide caused by asphyxia due to neck and back compression that led to a lack of blood flow to the brain" And because he was black? Intent is obviously almost impossible to prove, but I'd probably refer you to Chauvin's history of excessive force towards people who were ethnic minorities. I think most people could conclude that, but it's more highlighting a straw that broke the camel's back kind of issue. There is huge well-documented and researched biases and disparities in terms of sentencing, stops, searches and arrests, biases from judges, juries and prosecutors, death penalty sentencing and implicit bias. I can refer you to any of those at your request. I think a rational person could conclude these disparities were due to racist beliefs, whether conscious or unconscious. I didn't miss the key word. Again, it goes back to the proof. If a Black person is killed, i.e George Floyd it's instantly seen as being of a racial nature. In fact, when any person of another race is, it's instanly made out to be of a racial nature. Sometimes they may be, sometimes they may not. I've been through this before on this thread, when you look at the data in depth in regards arrests, sentencing, prosecutions etc, then the Blacks with the harshest of these are usually repeat offenders, career Criminals or have a long list of incidents to their name. Just like George Floyd did. It's not just a case of them being Black.
|
|
|
Post by oldie on Mar 29, 2021 21:26:13 GMT
|
|