Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2020 10:59:28 GMT
And of course with the algorithm which they use to downgrade being a postcode-type filter it won’t be the children of ministers or relatively wealthy people who suffer but the children of working and lower middle class people who don’t have access to the best of schools. They will have been going to schools where staff have been working their socks off to turn them around and improve them. Whatever happens, staffs in school will not trust or even respect Williamson so he has to go. Another attempt by those in power to support their “type” and keep others in their place. The next few days will see if BJ has the wherewithal to sack Williamson. He should resign and failing that be sacked but after Jenrick and Cummings who knows. I suspect there will be a re-shuffle in the Autumn and some people will disappear without having to “sack” them. But who knows with this government, they appear to have no moral compass. I was genuinely shocked to discover that moderation included consideration of the history of the school. How on earth can you moderate assessment of a child's performance by considering the school's history? That just cements the underperformance inpertuity. The thing that should be moderated is the actual marking. A two step process of internal verification and a 30% sampling external verification should be enough to ensure the robustness of the actual assessment against awarding body criteria. Williamson this morning was rambling on about not being prejudicial against minorities or people from deprived areas. What bollox, moderation should take no account of sex, ethnic background nor economic status. He was making it up, just as his boss does. Can you imagine the detail in any trade deals negotiated by these utter clowns? Btw, where the f*ck is Johnson? On another holiday? It's Ofqual. They were told to constrain grade inflation. So they did= chaos. Public Health England us to be disbanded. Covid policy was their fault. Dido Harding, (yes, I know, you could not make it up) she of Test, Track & Trace App infamy is to head up a new body. In the meantime Johnson is, ummm, somewhere.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2020 11:00:58 GMT
I was genuinely shocked to discover that moderation included consideration of the history of the school. How on earth can you moderate assessment of a child's performance by considering the school's history? That just cements the underperformance inpertuity. The thing that should be moderated is the actual marking. A two step process of internal verification and a 30% sampling external verification should be enough to ensure the robustness of the actual assessment against awarding body criteria. Williamson this morning was rambling on about not being prejudicial against minorities or people from deprived areas. What bollox, moderation should take no account of sex, ethnic background nor economic status. He was making it up, just as his boss does. Can you imagine the detail in any trade deals negotiated by these utter clowns? Btw, where the f*ck is Johnson? On another holiday? It's Ofqual. They were told to constrain grade inflation. So they did= chaos. Public Health England us to be disbanded. Covid policy was their fault. Dido Harding, (yes, I know, you could not make it up) she of Test, Track & Trace App infamy is to head up a new body. In the meantime Johnson is, ummm, somewhere. Quoted myself, not sure how that happened? Sorry.
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Aug 18, 2020 11:01:21 GMT
And of course with the algorithm which they use to downgrade being a postcode-type filter it won’t be the children of ministers or relatively wealthy people who suffer but the children of working and lower middle class people who don’t have access to the best of schools. They will have been going to schools where staff have been working their socks off to turn them around and improve them. Whatever happens, staffs in school will not trust or even respect Williamson so he has to go. Another attempt by those in power to support their “type” and keep others in their place. The next few days will see if BJ has the wherewithal to sack Williamson. He should resign and failing that be sacked but after Jenrick and Cummings who knows. I suspect there will be a re-shuffle in the Autumn and some people will disappear without having to “sack” them. But who knows with this government, they appear to have no moral compass. I was genuinely shocked to discover that moderation included consideration of the history of the school. How on earth can you moderate assessment of a child's performance by considering the school's history? That just cements the underperformance inpertuity. The thing that should be moderated is the actual marking. A two step process of internal verification and a 30% sampling external verification should be enough to ensure the robustness of the actual assessment against awarding body criteria. Williamson this morning was rambling on about not being prejudicial against minorities or people from deprived areas. What bollox, moderation should take no account of sex, ethnic background nor economic status. He was making it up, just as his boss does. Can you imagine the detail in any trade deals negotiated by these utter clowns? Btw, where the f*ck is Johnson? On another holiday? I spent my life in education, 40 years with 30 of them as a Headteacher in 4 different schools and I’m still shocked at the utter incompetence of this lot. My first year as HT was when the National Curriculum came in so I spent my life organising assessment, moderating to ensure the children in your care were given the best chance. Were I or any of my HT colleagues to have acted as ineptly as this minister we would have been sacked by our boards of governors Of course you moderate the actual work/marking against the criteria of the exam boards. Since it was announced in March they would have known the likely problems that needed overcoming. Yet he comes on TV or the radio churning out meaningless words about the robustness of his systems, does a U turn and now apologises. Of course he was making it up, no attention to detail, leaving it to others. But unfortunately he epitomise this government, little detail behind the headlines and no backbone when it goes wrong. If you had made this up no one would have believed it but it is the reality of this government.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2020 11:05:01 GMT
I was genuinely shocked to discover that moderation included consideration of the history of the school. How on earth can you moderate assessment of a child's performance by considering the school's history? That just cements the underperformance inpertuity. The thing that should be moderated is the actual marking. A two step process of internal verification and a 30% sampling external verification should be enough to ensure the robustness of the actual assessment against awarding body criteria. Williamson this morning was rambling on about not being prejudicial against minorities or people from deprived areas. What bollox, moderation should take no account of sex, ethnic background nor economic status. He was making it up, just as his boss does. Can you imagine the detail in any trade deals negotiated by these utter clowns? Btw, where the f*ck is Johnson? On another holiday? I spent my life in education, 40 years with 30 of them as a Headteacher in 4 different schools and I’m still shocked at the utter incompetence of this lot. My first year as HT was when the National Curriculum came in so I spent my life organising assessment, moderating to ensure the children in your care were given the best chance. Were I or any of my HT colleagues to have acted as ineptly as this minister we would have been sacked by our boards of governors Of course you moderate the actual work/marking against the criteria of the exam boards. Since it was announced in March they would have known the likely problems that needed overcoming. Yet he comes on TV or the radio churning out meaningless words about the robustness of his systems, does a U turn and now apologises. Of course he was making it up, no attention to detail, leaving it to others. But unfortunately he epitomise this government, little detail behind the headlines and no backbone when it goes wrong. If you had made this up no one would have believed it but it is the reality of this government. Excellent Wareham. Good to have somebody in board who knows what they are talking about. Unlike these utter charlatans in Government.
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Aug 18, 2020 11:25:04 GMT
So how are they going to handle the fact that University places have been taken by those that under the correct system wouldn't have got in and therefore those that did, can't?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2020 11:51:11 GMT
So how are they going to handle the fact that University places have been taken by those that under the correct system wouldn't have got in and therefore those that did, can't? By family income and voting intentions.
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Aug 18, 2020 11:53:21 GMT
So how are they going to handle the fact that University places have been taken by those that under the correct system wouldn't have got in and therefore those that did, can't? By family income and voting intentions. Again? Is there anything this lot don't base that on?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2020 12:10:36 GMT
By family income and voting intentions. Again? Is there anything this lot don't base that on? Truth and Fact almost always fall foul of that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2020 12:24:04 GMT
"It is a kind of genius, really. You appoint the most useless cabinet that has ever been assembled, and one by one you purge all of the departments of their top administrators as they are conned into carrying the can for the staggering fiascos that, entirely coincidentally, have only happened once the Cabinet of None of The Talents showed up." "On they all go, the Carnival of the Clueless, burning down all before them. From sixth form colleges to care homes, cradle quite literally to the grave, they’re coming for you. When they find you and strip away either your life chances or your life itself, the important thing to remember is that it will always all be somebody else’s fault." Indeed. flip.it/pdiBwi
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Aug 18, 2020 12:31:09 GMT
Again? Is there anything this lot don't base that on? Truth and Fact almost always fall foul of that. I honestly can't believe people still think they're doing a great job, got the Country at heart, will look after all of us, our economy is still one of the Worlds best, what's wrong with people?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2020 12:32:48 GMT
Who created the algorithm?
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Aug 18, 2020 12:37:21 GMT
Who created the algorithm? Somebody the Govt can blame?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2020 12:48:42 GMT
Anyone seen the public health England story? The gov are going to replace it, in the middle of a pandemic. Apparently the person in charge of the process is a woman who oversaw the Talk Talk data breach scandal, her hubby is part of a think tank that wants to privatise the NHS. I mean on there current run of form does anyone trust them to not f*ck it up? www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-53813480
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Aug 18, 2020 12:52:01 GMT
Anyone seen the public health England story? The gov are going to replace it, in the middle of a pandemic. Apparently the person in charge of the process is a woman who oversaw the Talk Talk data breach scandal, her hubby is part of a think tank that wants to privatise the NHS. I mean on there current run of form does anyone trust them to not f*ck it up? www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-53813480Someone, somewhere, is going to make a shed load of money. Again.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2020 13:02:42 GMT
Anyone seen the public health England story? The gov are going to replace it, in the middle of a pandemic. Apparently the person in charge of the process is a woman who oversaw the Talk Talk data breach scandal, her hubby is part of a think tank that wants to privatise the NHS. I mean on there current run of form does anyone trust them to not f*ck it up? www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-53813480Dido Harding....ahemmm
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2020 13:03:34 GMT
Who created the algorithm? But under instruction to build in a block against grade inflation. That was a political decision.
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Aug 18, 2020 13:14:39 GMT
BJ has been largely able to avoid blame by association on many of the issues since March. The housing scandal overseen by Jenrick didn’t receive the publicity it could have received in normal times, The Cummings issue he was able to show himself as a loyal friend and colleague and once he’d weathered the week in which it happened he was ok. None of those posed too many public problems for him. The BLM protests he was able to side himself with the protesters so it was never aimed at him. This A Level debacle isn’t going to go away. Too many young people have had their chance to go to their first choice University ruined. The universities will find it hard to go against offers made to students after the initial results meaning that those who’ve results have been up graded may not get the places they earned. The damage has been done. UCAS, the universities, schools, 18-19 year olds whose careers are now effectively put on hold for a year or even more or even irrevocably damaged will not forgive him and neither should they. He had been warned about this and as SOS for Education he should know the consequences without being told. To have stuck his head in the sand will not cut it. BJ will now be facing the ire and anger of thousands of young people and he will not avoid that in the same way he’s been able to avoid the other bad stuff. This is going to play out on the front pages of the press, TV headlines and as we’ve learnt over the past 2/3 years young people nowadays are able to articulate their concerns, can distill their arguments into very effective protests. BJ needs to grasp the situation and deal with it, but evidence has shown (unless it’s anything to do with Brexit) that he is unlikely to do that. Is he even aware of what’s happening?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2020 13:33:08 GMT
BJ has been largely able to avoid blame by association on many of the issues since March. The housing scandal overseen by Jenrick didn’t receive the publicity it could have received in normal times, The Cummings issue he was able to show himself as a loyal friend and colleague and once he’d weathered the week in which it happened he was ok. None of those posed too many public problems for him. The BLM protests he was able to side himself with the protesters so it was never aimed at him. This A Level debacle isn’t going to go away. Too many young people have had their chance to go to their first choice University ruined. The universities will find it hard to go against offers made to students after the initial results meaning that those who’ve results have been up graded may not get the places they earned. The damage has been done. UCAS, the universities, schools, 18-19 year olds whose careers are now effectively put on hold for a year or even more or even irrevocably damaged will not forgive him and neither should they. He had been warned about this and as SOS for Education he should know the consequences without being told. To have stuck his head in the sand will not cut it. BJ will now be facing the ire and anger of thousands of young people and he will not avoid that in the same way he’s been able to avoid the other bad stuff. This is going to play out on the front pages of the press, TV headlines and as we’ve learnt over the past 2/3 years young people nowadays are able to articulate their concerns, can distill their arguments into very effective protests. BJ needs to grasp the situation and deal with it, but evidence has shown (unless it’s anything to do with Brexit) that he is unlikely to do that. Is he even aware of what’s happening? yeah will be interesting to see how it plays out. I thought students could be a powerful body but when uni fees were raised in 2010 nothing really happened.
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Aug 18, 2020 14:46:44 GMT
BJ has been largely able to avoid blame by association on many of the issues since March. The housing scandal overseen by Jenrick didn’t receive the publicity it could have received in normal times, The Cummings issue he was able to show himself as a loyal friend and colleague and once he’d weathered the week in which it happened he was ok. None of those posed too many public problems for him. The BLM protests he was able to side himself with the protesters so it was never aimed at him. This A Level debacle isn’t going to go away. Too many young people have had their chance to go to their first choice University ruined. The universities will find it hard to go against offers made to students after the initial results meaning that those who’ve results have been up graded may not get the places they earned. The damage has been done. UCAS, the universities, schools, 18-19 year olds whose careers are now effectively put on hold for a year or even more or even irrevocably damaged will not forgive him and neither should they. He had been warned about this and as SOS for Education he should know the consequences without being told. To have stuck his head in the sand will not cut it. BJ will now be facing the ire and anger of thousands of young people and he will not avoid that in the same way he’s been able to avoid the other bad stuff. This is going to play out on the front pages of the press, TV headlines and as we’ve learnt over the past 2/3 years young people nowadays are able to articulate their concerns, can distill their arguments into very effective protests. BJ needs to grasp the situation and deal with it, but evidence has shown (unless it’s anything to do with Brexit) that he is unlikely to do that. Is he even aware of what’s happening? yeah will be interesting to see how it plays out. I thought students could be a powerful body but when uni fees were raised in 2010 nothing really happened. Whether you agree with the uni fees or not it was a matter of policy / politics and generally had many people agreeing with it, students will earn more in time so they should pay for it. Again you could make a case for it. This debacle is different it’s not political, not policy just utter incompetence which will affect young people’s future. There is no justification nor argument for it, it portrays the government as lazy (they never sorted it out), unprepared (despite being an accident waiting to happen the SOS did nothing to offset the difficulties in the months prior), panic-stricken (changing stuff at late notice, 10.30pm!!, on the day before). Listening and watching Williamson I wouldn’t put him in charge of giving out the exercise books in a classroom, it would turn into chaos.
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Aug 18, 2020 17:19:38 GMT
Who created the algorithm? But under instruction to build in a block against grade inflation. That was a political decision. Without knowing whether eric was suggesting the blame lies on the builders, or was genuinely wondering who built it - who do you blame for WW2, the soldier or Hitler?
|
|