yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,503
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 12, 2021 7:37:04 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2021 8:01:03 GMT
May be some changes on the coal mine, perhaps. "A public inquiry will be held into plans for the UK's first deep coal mine in 30 years after a government U-turn. Communities Secretary Robert Jenrick has now decided to "call in" the controversial application for a new mine near Whitehaven, Cumbria. The government previously chose not to intervene over Cumbria County Council's approval of the plan. This was despite campaigners expressing environmental concerns and ministers being accused of hypocrisy as they focus on carbon-reducing efforts ahead of hosting the international COP26 climate change summit in Glasgow this year." news.sky.com/story/public-inquiry-to-be-held-into-cumbria-coal-mine-plans-after-government-u-turn-12243229A shambles from the politicians, shows that there really isn't much difference between the 3 parties when it comes to money.
|
|
|
Post by francegas on Mar 12, 2021 8:12:34 GMT
Doesn't make good reading I agree. Just wondering if the lockdown measures and the fact there's a global pandemic has made any impact. Whilst you posted this on the "This Government" thread I assume you blame the government for the figures. I therefore assume when there is the predicted bounce back of the economy in the months to come you'll come back and post congratulating the government. 🙂👍
|
|
yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,503
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 12, 2021 11:14:48 GMT
Doesn't make good reading I agree. Just wondering if the lockdown measures and the fact there's a global pandemic has made any impact. Whilst you posted this on the "This Government" thread I assume you blame the government for the figures. I therefore assume when there is the predicted bounce back of the economy in the months to come you'll come back and post congratulating the government. 🙂👍 Well if we can’t bounce back after the worst slump for 300 yrs there really is something wrong , it would be impossible not to. I’m sure you wouldn’t be daft enough to come on here cheering when there’s an upturn , there can’t not be one can there ? Yes I blame the government , Brexit is a Tory project . Also you have to compare comparatively how we’ve faired up to other EU countries , I’ll give you a clue..... we’re not winning 🇬🇧
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Mar 16, 2021 18:20:52 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56413920So, we’re increasing the cap on Nuclear bombs, when we were supposed to be lowering it. Are we trying to start a Cold War 2.0?
|
|
yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,503
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 16, 2021 18:33:16 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56413920So, we’re increasing the cap on Nuclear bombs, when we were supposed to be lowering it. Are we trying to start a Cold War 2.0? The whole nuclear bombs thingy is bloody mental ..... they Chuck one at us and it’s game over anyway . If we get enough warning we can lob one back and it’s game over for both sides . We’re never going to bomb first so we’ll only ever retaliate but it’ll already be too late . pretty sure I read somewhere that’s there’s enough nuclear bombs to blow up the world about 50 times over . It’s madness
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Mar 16, 2021 19:00:34 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56413920So, we’re increasing the cap on Nuclear bombs, when we were supposed to be lowering it. Are we trying to start a Cold War 2.0? The whole nuclear bombs thingy is bloody mental ..... they Chuck one at us and it’s game over anyway . If we get enough warning we can lob one back and it’s game over for both sides . We’re never going to bomb first so we’ll only ever retaliate but it’ll already be too late . pretty sure I read somewhere that’s there’s enough nuclear bombs to blow up the world about 50 times over . It’s madness Totally agree complete waste of money, we wouldn’t fire unless the Americans gave us permission and it would be academic by then,save the money and reinvest in Social Services etc
|
|
yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,503
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 16, 2021 19:59:32 GMT
The whole nuclear bombs thingy is bloody mental ..... they Chuck one at us and it’s game over anyway . If we get enough warning we can lob one back and it’s game over for both sides . We’re never going to bomb first so we’ll only ever retaliate but it’ll already be too late . pretty sure I read somewhere that’s there’s enough nuclear bombs to blow up the world about 50 times over . It’s madness Totally agree complete waste of money, we wouldn’t fire unless the Americans gave us permission and it would be academic by then,save the money and reinvest in Social Services etc Cover the uk with a massive ( bomb proof ) retractable dome roof . It’s probably cheaper and we can stop the bloody rain as well.
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Mar 16, 2021 20:31:00 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56413920So, we’re increasing the cap on Nuclear bombs, when we were supposed to be lowering it. Are we trying to start a Cold War 2.0? Cold War 2.0 started many years ago. The increase is probably to cover a projected increase in stocks while we transition from one version to another. I would expect stocks to reduce over time afterwards. It also acts as a headline grabber to detract from the cuts being announced next Monday abd potentially puts Labour in a bind. The big change is in the policy; "However, we reserve the right to review this assurance if the future threat of weapons of mass destruction, such as chemical and biological capabilities, or emerging technologies that could have a comparable impact, makes it necessary," Previously it was just a nuclear attack iirc.
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Mar 17, 2021 13:35:49 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56413920So, we’re increasing the cap on Nuclear bombs, when we were supposed to be lowering it. Are we trying to start a Cold War 2.0? Cold War 2.0 started many years ago. The increase is probably to cover a projected increase in stocks while we transition from one version to another. I would expect stocks to reduce over time afterwards. It also acts as a headline grabber to detract from the cuts being announced next Monday abd potentially puts Labour in a bind. The big change is in the policy; "However, we reserve the right to review this assurance if the future threat of weapons of mass destruction, such as chemical and biological capabilities, or emerging technologies that could have a comparable impact, makes it necessary," Previously it was just a nuclear attack iirc. How/ why does it put labour in a bind?
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Mar 17, 2021 13:44:56 GMT
Cold War 2.0 started many years ago. The increase is probably to cover a projected increase in stocks while we transition from one version to another. I would expect stocks to reduce over time afterwards. It also acts as a headline grabber to detract from the cuts being announced next Monday abd potentially puts Labour in a bind. The big change is in the policy; "However, we reserve the right to review this assurance if the future threat of weapons of mass destruction, such as chemical and biological capabilities, or emerging technologies that could have a comparable impact, makes it necessary," Previously it was just a nuclear attack iirc. How/ why does it put labour in a bind? They officially will renew and retain Trident but have a large anti nuclear lobby, if they back the proposals they risk reopening the split, if they don't they risk the Conservatives making political capital. Whether you are for, against or ambivalent, that's Westminster politics for you.
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Mar 18, 2021 9:10:50 GMT
I thought this was an interesting article on our relationship with the Indo-Pacific region. A few snippets: "Either way, the British public are startlingly ill-prepared for what is to come. When the British Foreign Policy Group asked Brits whether they supported the UK’s greater involvement in the region, more than 50% said they did not know, or opposed the shift. This big idea is coming out of the blue." "It said the region now accounts for close to half of global economic output and more than half the world’s population: it contains the world’s two most populous nations, China and India; the world’s second and third largest economies, China and Japan; the world’s largest democracy, India; and two of the world’s largest Muslim populations, in India and Indonesia. Its sea lanes are the “world’s most critical”, it said, including the Malacca Strait linking the Indian Ocean with the South China Sea." " [Jo Johnson said] “So I am very pleased the prime minister is describing himself as a Sinophile because he is facing a Conservative party for which Sinophobia is the new Euroscepticism. It’s the new political machismo, but it would be economic madness to decouple from China and incredibly destructive of this idea of global Britain, because there are many countries […] across the global south who are increasingly interdependent with China. There won’t be a global Britain if we are not engaging with China, and all the other countries enmeshed with it.” " "Liz Truss, is positively evangelical about a Pacific-based export-led recovery, however. She says it will give the UK access to a £9tn GDP and without any need to join a EU-style political club. Most of its existing members – accounting for a market of 500 million people and about 14% of the world economy – are enthusiastic, especially Japan, the UK’s lead ally in this enterprise and often described as the quiet leader of the Indo-Pacific. A preliminary decision is expected in May, with membership achieved early next year." " “The tensions in the Conservative party about which dominates, whether it is the red wall MPs wanting heavy protectionism for communities that have been at the hard end of globalisation or our southern MPs who are all ready to support our free trading ambitions, is still is very real and yet to be resolved.” " channel16.dryadglobal.com/why-britain-is-tilting-to-the-indo-pacific-region?hs_amp=true&__twitter_impression=trueN.B. the original source of the article was The Guardian.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2021 13:19:09 GMT
I thought this was an interesting article on our relationship with the Indo-Pacific region. A few snippets: "Either way, the British public are startlingly ill-prepared for what is to come. When the British Foreign Policy Group asked Brits whether they supported the UK’s greater involvement in the region, more than 50% said they did not know, or opposed the shift. This big idea is coming out of the blue." "It said the region now accounts for close to half of global economic output and more than half the world’s population: it contains the world’s two most populous nations, China and India; the world’s second and third largest economies, China and Japan; the world’s largest democracy, India; and two of the world’s largest Muslim populations, in India and Indonesia. Its sea lanes are the “world’s most critical”, it said, including the Malacca Strait linking the Indian Ocean with the South China Sea." " [Jo Johnson said] “So I am very pleased the prime minister is describing himself as a Sinophile because he is facing a Conservative party for which Sinophobia is the new Euroscepticism. It’s the new political machismo, but it would be economic madness to decouple from China and incredibly destructive of this idea of global Britain, because there are many countries […] across the global south who are increasingly interdependent with China. There won’t be a global Britain if we are not engaging with China, and all the other countries enmeshed with it.” " "Liz Truss, is positively evangelical about a Pacific-based export-led recovery, however. She says it will give the UK access to a £9tn GDP and without any need to join a EU-style political club. Most of its existing members – accounting for a market of 500 million people and about 14% of the world economy – are enthusiastic, especially Japan, the UK’s lead ally in this enterprise and often described as the quiet leader of the Indo-Pacific. A preliminary decision is expected in May, with membership achieved early next year." " “The tensions in the Conservative party about which dominates, whether it is the red wall MPs wanting heavy protectionism for communities that have been at the hard end of globalisation or our southern MPs who are all ready to support our free trading ambitions, is still is very real and yet to be resolved.” " channel16.dryadglobal.com/why-britain-is-tilting-to-the-indo-pacific-region?hs_amp=true&__twitter_impression=trueN.B. the original source of the article was The Guardian. That was a tough read! No wonder politics is so f'd up today if that is how they talk.
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Mar 18, 2021 20:25:18 GMT
Sturgeon should go, but I would suspect there is enough wriggle room to stay. 'Not knowingly misled being a major one. "Sky News understands that Holyrood's harassment committee has reached the conclusion by a majority vote ahead of the publication of its final report. Members have decided that Ms Sturgeon misled the committee itself and, as such, misled parliament and potentially breached the ministerial code of conduct." news.sky.com/story/sturgeon-misled-parliament-over-role-in-salmond-investigation-committee-finds-12249817
|
|
yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,503
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 18, 2021 20:29:20 GMT
Sturgeon should go, but I would suspect there is enough wriggle room to stay. 'Not knowingly misled being a major one. "Sky News understands that Holyrood's harassment committee has reached the conclusion by a majority vote ahead of the publication of its final report. Members have decided that Ms Sturgeon misled the committee itself and, as such, misled parliament and potentially breached the ministerial code of conduct." news.sky.com/story/sturgeon-misled-parliament-over-role-in-salmond-investigation-committee-finds-12249817Resigning for wrong doing is so last century 🙄. Keep up Stu 😉
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Mar 18, 2021 21:15:00 GMT
Sturgeon should go, but I would suspect there is enough wriggle room to stay. 'Not knowingly misled being a major one. "Sky News understands that Holyrood's harassment committee has reached the conclusion by a majority vote ahead of the publication of its final report. Members have decided that Ms Sturgeon misled the committee itself and, as such, misled parliament and potentially breached the ministerial code of conduct." news.sky.com/story/sturgeon-misled-parliament-over-role-in-salmond-investigation-committee-finds-12249817100% she should go. She won't though. And if she doesn't it just makes what the current government do even more acceptable. Which isn't healthy for anyone.
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Mar 18, 2021 21:29:04 GMT
Sturgeon should go, but I would suspect there is enough wriggle room to stay. 'Not knowingly misled being a major one. "Sky News understands that Holyrood's harassment committee has reached the conclusion by a majority vote ahead of the publication of its final report. Members have decided that Ms Sturgeon misled the committee itself and, as such, misled parliament and potentially breached the ministerial code of conduct." news.sky.com/story/sturgeon-misled-parliament-over-role-in-salmond-investigation-committee-finds-12249817100% she should go. She won't though. And if she doesn't it just makes what the current government do even more acceptable. Which isn't healthy for anyone. And she'll be re-elected (possibly in coalition with the Greens) claiming a mandate for IndyRef2.
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Mar 18, 2021 21:31:31 GMT
Sturgeon should go, but I would suspect there is enough wriggle room to stay. 'Not knowingly misled being a major one. "Sky News understands that Holyrood's harassment committee has reached the conclusion by a majority vote ahead of the publication of its final report. Members have decided that Ms Sturgeon misled the committee itself and, as such, misled parliament and potentially breached the ministerial code of conduct." news.sky.com/story/sturgeon-misled-parliament-over-role-in-salmond-investigation-committee-finds-12249817Resigning for wrong doing is so last century 🙄. Keep up Stu 😉 Have we become immune to moral lapses?
|
|
yattongas
Forum Legend
Posts: 15,503
Member is Online
|
Post by yattongas on Mar 18, 2021 21:53:29 GMT
Resigning for wrong doing is so last century 🙄. Keep up Stu 😉 Have we become immune to moral lapses? Ask Pritti Patel
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Mar 19, 2021 7:44:17 GMT
Have we become immune to moral lapses? Ask Pritti Patel Or Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon
|
|