|
Post by supergas on Jan 6, 2015 10:04:49 GMT
Good teams need a 20 goal striker. Or at least 2 on and around the 15 mark. I think we may get several into double figures which will probably give us a decent season ending. So in my opinion 20 goals is what should be expected from a front line marksman. So last season's League Two Champions (Chesterfield) weren't a good team (two on 11), the previous season's Champions (Gillingham) weren't a good team (one on 14, one on 12), and the season before that the Champions (Swindon, 2011-12) weren't a good team as their top two goalscorers had 11 each?
|
|
|
Post by You can call me Al. on Jan 6, 2015 10:47:46 GMT
Right, just shut up, the lot of you. It's like listening to bloody girls shopping for clothes.
Let me tell you something, How many goals make a striker successful? None! if he plays well enough to help your team WIN playing as a striker...He makes himself difficult to drop due to his all round attributes and contributions to the team getting a result, he improves the squad, he enhances your chances of winning when he plays, he works tirelessly to achieve the win, and is an integral part of a team spirit that helps create a willing to be successful. Some of the greatest forwards in our game create spaces for others, they attract defenders to release others.
The point of the game of football is to bleedin win, if that striker achieves that aim whether by scoring or not then HE IS a successful striker, it's not bloody rocket science. If you have a striker who is an integral part of a winning team that gets promoted yet scores no goals are you really gonna complain? Cause i know i bleedin wouldn't.
Now, i've got a meeting to attend. Good morning to you all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2015 10:55:36 GMT
Right, just shut up, the lot of you. It's like listening to bloody girls shopping for clothes. Let me tell you something, How many goals make a striker successful? None! if he plays well enough to help your team WIN playing as a striker...He makes himself difficult to drop due to his all round attributes and contributions to the team getting a result, he improves the squad, he enhances your chances of winning when he plays, he works tirelessly to achieve the win, and is an integral part of a team spirit that helps create a willing to be successful. Some of the greatest forwards in our game create spaces for others, they attract defenders to release others. The point of the game of football is to bleedin win, if that striker achieves that aim whether by scoring or not then HE IS a successful striker, it's not bloody rocket science. If you have a striker who is an integral part of a winning team that gets promoted yet scores no goals are you really gonna complain? Cause i know i bleedin wouldn't. Now, i've got a meeting to attend. Good morning to you all. thats a very good post i agree with that
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2015 11:06:47 GMT
Yep, I've got to agree with that as well.
Was Teddy Sheringham a successful striker? Most would say he was. He played at the highest level, even scoring in a Champs League Final, but his scoring record wasn't that brilliant. His ability to help the team function was probably more important than his goal scoring, although he obviously did score some goals, but you would never have called him an out-and-out striker.
|
|
|
Post by Congas on Jan 6, 2015 13:36:05 GMT
Like I said, 15+ goals for Taylor in a promotion-chasing side.
|
|