Gaffer ends subscription service on X

Not my account, if I try to look at other people's. If I try Rovers' it brings up tweets from 2022.

A short sentence so many of us say quietly after reading your posts. 

You are correct Tilly, many are the folk who go quietly about raising money or doing good deeds , they do not feel they have to justify their actions nor do they seek plaudits or praise for doing so, it's only when people start to question their motives that they feel it necessary to put the record straight, some folk can't accept that there are people who are just inherently kind ,their only motive being to help someone, or that even flawed characters as many of us are ,including JB, are capable of doing good deeds.

You are correct Tilly, many are the folk who go quietly about raising money or doing good deeds , they do not feel they have to justify their actions nor do they seek plaudits or praise for doing so, it's only when people start to question their motives that they feel it necessary to put the record straight, some folk can't accept that there are people who are just inherently kind ,their only motive being to help someone, or that even flawed characters as many of us are ,including JB, are capable of doing good deeds.

Moaners?
From my perspective raising money from a transaction that lands into a personal bank account, funds raised predicated upon an EMPLOYED role with an organisation that owns the intellectual property being charged for is "ill considered", at best.

Embarrassing because the link to N Anderton was only made AFTER Barton announced this scheme. I accept he did say a proportion would go to charity at the outset, but he never mentioned which or what percentage. That would have been easier and made the scheme more marketable if he had linked Anderton, surely.

I have never worked in an organisation where this guff would have been allowed to happen. I suspect (without any evidence) that the new Kuwaiti executive may agree which, if true, bodes well.

Had to ask grandchildren what your reply meant, so glad my post made you happy  if not a little bemused as to why, sorry it caused you to have an embarrassing personal episode, i believe you can purchase items at the chemist to ease your discomfort and embarrassment.

Presumably this is all taxable income at a higher rate. JB must be raking it in, I can see him now in his vault room of money swimming about. 

You are right though, anyone that does anything linked to charity should be slammed. I wont give to any cancer charity until i get cancer. 

Or he just did it for a limited amount of time to raise money for Nick?

It's possible to overthink these things.

Maybe Nick Anderton prefers the fund raising to be kept low key, hence JB firstly referring vaguely to "a cherity" as the beneficiary? Not everybody feels the need to shout about what they've done/how much money they've raised, from the rooftops. I don't find it in the least embarassing to raise money for somebody who finds themselves in Nick's position.