|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Feb 6, 2024 8:54:15 GMT
That's still brideing fans to attend games rather then 10,000+ turning up to watch us and paying full price, which was SteveK's point.
|
|
|
|
Post by gasify on Feb 6, 2024 16:28:22 GMT
That's still brideing fans to attend games rather then 10,000+ turning up to watch us and paying full price, which was SteveK's point. SteveK's point was that we couldn't get 75% in the stand, due to performance on the pitch. Which is incorrect. We could have got 75% by being clever. Now, if this is one of those comments by SteveK where he is maybe subtly referring to the fact that he was unhappy about regime change, then that is a different question. You only have to look at weeknight attendances when he who shan't be named was in charge was also well below filling the South Stand with additional punters. Port Vale was 7,364 (378) Stevenage was 7,143 (228 away) When was the last time we had over 10k fans without the away team bringing over 1000? |
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Feb 6, 2024 18:29:10 GMT
Game at a time. All eyes on Fleetwood & Charlie Adam’s mob for me. No further than that Spot on dude. No expecting 10 from 5 or 13 from 7. The most important match is the next one. Concentrate on beating Fleetwood then train and plan to beat Burton. One match at a time. 👍👍 UTG! |
|
|
|
Post by dudelebowski on Feb 6, 2024 21:56:48 GMT
Game at a time. All eyes on Fleetwood & Charlie Adam’s mob for me. No further than that Spot on dude. No expecting 10 from 5 or 13 from 7. The most important match is the next one. Concentrate on beating Fleetwood then train and plan to beat Burton. One match at a time. 👍👍 UTG! & there it is…. |
|
|
|
Post by stevek192 on Feb 7, 2024 16:17:38 GMT
Gasify, Nothing to do with the change of regime.Due i think to results plus the inability to bring in a noteworthy striker ie JCH or similar ilk. Everybody knew that especially after selling Collins at least one striker was minimum requirement. However i am convinced that JB would have brought in another striker. It is far to early to blame the Manager or to say that the change was a poor decision.
If a new striker had been brought in to show the owners mean business I have no doubt that the 75% limit would have been reached
|
|
|
|
Post by gasify on Feb 7, 2024 16:44:01 GMT
Gasify, Nothing to do with the change of regime.Due i think to results plus the inability to bring in a noteworthy striker ie JCH or similar ilk. Everybody knew that especially after selling Collins at least one striker was minimum requirement. However i am convinced that JB would have brought in another striker. It is far to early to blame the Manager or to say that the change was a poor decision. If a new striker had been brought in to show the owners mean business I have no doubt that the 75% limit would have been reached You said that the reason we couldn't get 75% capacity in the South Stand for the Exeter game was due to performances. That simply isn't true. Every Tuesday evening game we have had this season has been a woeful crowd. Not just against Exeter and not just last night. I even gave you examples of previous Tuesday night attendances in October which were around the 7k mark. you say: "It is far to early to blame the Manager or to say that the change was a poor decision." However, your comments previously have suggested something different. I don't understand how you can put the 75% capacity down to anything other than the idiots trying to do a 75% capacity test on a Tuesday night while only announcing cheap tickets the night before. Just really terrible planning on the clubs part. |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Feb 7, 2024 20:30:35 GMT
I didn't think the "idiots" had much choice as SAG only agreed the 75% test event the day before?
It's easier to sit behind a keyboard calling the people running the club idiots but you've no real idea what they are up against.
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Feb 7, 2024 21:08:18 GMT
On the subject of the South Stand what happened to this disastrous design failing that we were told to expect when a game was played in heavy rain? I left early last night because the game was shyte but the Stand hadn’t collapsed when I left so assume everything was ok in the end!
|
|
|
|
Post by gasify on Feb 7, 2024 21:56:53 GMT
I didn't think the "idiots" had much choice as SAG only agreed the 75% test event the day before?It's easier to sit behind a keyboard calling the people running the club idiots but you've no real idea what they are up against. Are you genuinely asking a question? Or are you trying to use something that has become a 'gaschat fact' without really knowing if that is true or where that 'fact' came from. The "idiots" always had a choice: Choice 1 - Keep the South Stand at 50% Capacity for that game. Choice 2 - Try and get the stand 75% full. It sounds like you are trying to blame the SAG for us not being able to fill the stand to 75% capacity. |
|
