|
|
Post by curlywurly on Oct 27, 2024 17:36:49 GMT
I'll ask again - in who's opinion is Forde a bad apple at the club or is this hush, hush in the know stuff? I was told by someone who informs me of going’s on at Rovers, I’ve been proven right on a lot of stuff. He was signed by the owners son, not Taylor or Friend. Forde isn’t really happy here, he’s sulking and says he should be in the team, his interview this week he openly signed to start games, surely this is the aim for all players?……….then he is racially abused which is terrible but he has also decided to blame his employer as well deleting all reference to Bristol Rovers on his SM, he’s deleted it! I'm glad we did sign him. He was our best player yesterday, before getting sent off. As Topper says, MT had already indicated that Shaq Forde was a target, which undermines your point about how he was signed.
You also seem to have made some sweeping assumptions re Shaq's response on social media.
Any reason we should believe what you say?
|
|
|
|
Post by bluegas on Oct 27, 2024 17:43:55 GMT
I was told by someone who informs me of going’s on at Rovers, I’ve been proven right on a lot of stuff. He was signed by the owners son, not Taylor or Friend. Forde isn’t really happy here, he’s sulking and says he should be in the team, his interview this week he openly signed to start games, surely this is the aim for all players?……….then he is racially abused which is terrible but he has also decided to blame his employer as well deleting all reference to Bristol Rovers on his SM, he’s deleted it! I'm glad we did sign him. He was our best player yesterday, before getting sent off. As Topper says, MT had already indicated that Shaq Forde was a target, which undermines your point about how he was signed.
You also seem to have made some sweeping assumptions re Shaq's response on social media.
Any reason we should believe what you say?
Because someone informs him of goings on at the club obviously. 😜 |
|
|
|
Post by bluegas on Oct 27, 2024 17:49:34 GMT
I'll ask again - in who's opinion is Forde a bad apple at the club or is this hush, hush in the know stuff? I was told by someone who informs me of going’s on at Rovers, I’ve been proven right on a lot of stuff. He was signed by the owners son, not Taylor or Friend. Forde isn’t really happy here, he’s sulking and says he should be in the team, his interview this week he openly signed to start games, surely this is the aim for all players?……….then he is racially abused which is terrible but he has also decided to blame his employer as well deleting all reference to Bristol Rovers on his SM, he’s deleted it! This, uh, um, 'someone',is he or she anything to do with the club? An employee? Possibly even a player? Do tell, we'd all love to know. |
|
|
|
Post by Quarters on Oct 27, 2024 17:51:31 GMT
I'll make a comment if I want but I don't spread malicious rumours. Please slip the Pal nonsense while you are at it. It's you who said the lad was a bad apple in the changing room just because someone told you that or so you claim. You just passrd on unpleasant rumours and tried to turn people against the lad. Again pal, you comment and if I want to call you pal I will which isn’t rude or offensive. I stand by what I said and I think him taking racial abuse out on his employer is wrong as well, why delete everything associated to Bristol Rovers? It’s ill advised, reactionary and childish. I will and would question his attitude on this, right in line with what you said upset you so much. Well I think all players should stay of social media. |
|
|
|
Post by returngas on Oct 27, 2024 17:55:30 GMT
I was told by someone who informs me of going’s on at Rovers, I’ve been proven right on a lot of stuff. He was signed by the owners son, not Taylor or Friend. Forde isn’t really happy here, he’s sulking and says he should be in the team, his interview this week he openly signed to start games, surely this is the aim for all players?……….then he is racially abused which is terrible but he has also decided to blame his employer as well deleting all reference to Bristol Rovers on his SM, he’s deleted it! This, uh, um, 'someone',is he or she anything to do with the club? An employee? Possibly even a player? Do tell, we'd all love to know. I heard it was the assistant to the assistant bookkeeper who told it Roadman and she was told by someone I can't name who told me the same. All good sources and she has proved to be right quite often but makes up so many rumours that she's right sometimes based on the law of averages. |
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 27, 2024 18:39:18 GMT
Needing and pretending to know the ins and outs of a cats arse whilst actually not knowing anything for certain whilst bickering and arguing like school children.
Just another day in the Gaschat forum.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Oct 27, 2024 19:44:34 GMT
I’d fine Forde 8 weeks wages for that, he’s a proper bad apple as well around the changing room. That’s what happens when owners sign players. I’ve been anti MT but I wouldn’t want to manage that idiot, that was basically like any of us in the office throwing the phone across it or turning over your table. Suggest you stop your slanderous comments. Pretty sure its libel. 😉 |
|
|
|
Post by outsidehitter30 on Oct 27, 2024 22:17:03 GMT
Reading Goal Keeper was awarded MoM. Says it all really. Was that from the home team sponsors - I guess they are obliged to pick a home player? If there was an away sponsor obliged to pick an away player for mom who would ours have been? Griffiths or maybe one of the defenders? Also BBC Radio Berkshire |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Oct 28, 2024 7:30:51 GMT
Their goalie made at least 3 outstanding saves when we were down to 10 men but not one decent save when we had 11 men on the pitch.
Although most, if not all, of the saves were from our defenders, Mola had more attempts on goal than Ward's managed all season, surely MT has to think about playing Mola in a midfield role in one of this week's games?
|
|
|
|
Post by outsidehitter30 on Oct 28, 2024 8:00:48 GMT
Their goalie made at least 3 outstanding saves when we were down to 10 men but not one decent save when we had 11 men on the pitch. Although most, if not all, of the saves were from our defenders, Mola had more attempts on goal than Ward's managed all season, surely MT has to think about playing Mola in a midfield role in one of this week's games? I know Ward gets some criticism but I think he has been our most consistent midfielder. Ward & Conteh are played quite defensively I don't think its in the brief to plow forward its more about them getting the ball wide for others to charge forward. Hutch, Garrett & Lindsey have much more of a remit to push forward. |
|
|
|
Post by gashead79 on Oct 28, 2024 8:02:15 GMT
I'm glad we did sign him. He was our best player yesterday, before getting sent off. As Topper says, MT had already indicated that Shaq Forde was a target, which undermines your point about how he was signed.
You also seem to have made some sweeping assumptions re Shaq's response on social media.
Any reason we should believe what you say?
Because someone informs him of goings on at the club obviously. 😜 Well yeah, then when he shares bits of information which might be of interest on here, the usual crew come along and shout it down. Some of this stuff isn't nice to hear but Roadman has fairly solid insight. Just because people don't want to believe it, doesn't make it wrong. Whilst asking for info on who shares the info is just plain silly. |
|
|
|
Post by percy on Oct 28, 2024 9:42:41 GMT
Because someone informs him of goings on at the club obviously. 😜 Well yeah, then when he shares bits of information which might be of interest on here, the usual crew come along and shout it down. Some of this stuff isn't nice to hear but Roadman has fairly solid insight. Just because people don't want to believe it, doesn't make it wrong. Whilst asking for info on who shares the info is just plain silly. Not really "shutting him down" (is that possible  ) but he's a bit of a gossip and s h 1 t stirrer! No problem with it, but if you do that, expect some blow back. Not like he is just "passing on info" its always with an undertone of melodrama to it! If i was his inside source, I wouldnt trust him with any info, unless I wanted it shouted from the roof tops |
|
|
|
Post by returngas on Oct 28, 2024 10:01:51 GMT
Well yeah, then when he shares bits of information which might be of interest on here, the usual crew come along and shout it down. Some of this stuff isn't nice to hear but Roadman has fairly solid insight. Just because people don't want to believe it, doesn't make it wrong. Whilst asking for info on who shares the info is just plain silly. Not really "shutting him down" (is that possible ) but he's a bit of a gossip and s h 1 t stirrer! No problem with it, but if you do that, expect some blow back. Not like he is just "passing on info" its always with an undertone of melodrama to it! If i was his inside source, I wouldnt trust him with any info, unless I wanted it shouted from the roof tops There's always been at least one gossip at every place I've worked. And in my experience these gossips spin their stories to suit their own agenda. At most work places there is someone who sows division. I think the problem this time was that the ITK information was posted just before a rather sensitive racial abuse issue arose. Better to say nothing than keep saying you have information that puts the lad in a bad light at a difficult time. That's it, I've posted enough on this issue and just hope things work out well for him. |
|
|
|
Post by gashead79 on Oct 28, 2024 10:21:46 GMT
Well yeah, then when he shares bits of information which might be of interest on here, the usual crew come along and shout it down. Some of this stuff isn't nice to hear but Roadman has fairly solid insight. Just because people don't want to believe it, doesn't make it wrong. Whilst asking for info on who shares the info is just plain silly. Not really "shutting him down" (is that possible ) but he's a bit of a gossip and s h 1 t stirrer! No problem with it, but if you do that, expect some blow back. Not like he is just "passing on info" its always with an undertone of melodrama to it! If i was his inside source, I wouldnt trust him with any info, unless I wanted it shouted from the roof tops Shouting. Anyway, people can take the info as they want I guess. Pretty sure his sources are aware of what and how much he shares, plus any spin. It'll dry up if they aren't happy. Being a gossip and a sh** stirrer is another person's verification and validation right? A whistle-blower..thise guys are sh** stirrers in the eyes of the faithful and their rulers. |
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Oct 28, 2024 10:36:41 GMT
Not really "shutting him down" (is that possible ) but he's a bit of a gossip and s h 1 t stirrer! No problem with it, but if you do that, expect some blow back. Not like he is just "passing on info" its always with an undertone of melodrama to it! If i was his inside source, I wouldnt trust him with any info, unless I wanted it shouted from the roof tops Shouting. Anyway, people can take the info as they want I guess. Pretty sure his sources are aware of what and how much he shares, plus any spin. It'll dry up if they aren't happy. Being a gossip and a sh** stirrer is another person's verification and validation right? A whistle-blower..thise guys are sh** stirrers in the eyes of the faithful and their rulers. Always question the motivation of the primary source. 👍 |
|
|
|
Post by curlywurly on Oct 28, 2024 10:40:23 GMT
Not really "shutting him down" (is that possible ) but he's a bit of a gossip and s h 1 t stirrer! No problem with it, but if you do that, expect some blow back. Not like he is just "passing on info" its always with an undertone of melodrama to it! If i was his inside source, I wouldnt trust him with any info, unless I wanted it shouted from the roof tops Shouting. Anyway, people can take the info as they want I guess. Pretty sure his sources are aware of what and how much he shares, plus any spin. It'll dry up if they aren't happy. Being a gossip and a sh** stirrer is another person's verification and validation right? A whistle-blower..thise guys are sh** stirrers in the eyes of the faithful and their rulers.
Over the years we've had plenty of stories from an 'inside source' some of which prove to be true, some are bollocks, but all are corrosive.
|
|
|
|
Post by returnofthedust on Oct 28, 2024 11:19:11 GMT
Posting info you know on here is pointless. People choose to not believe it even when you have a track record of things being right. Best off not saying anything and not dealing with the stress if it all
|
|
|
|
Post by bluegas on Oct 28, 2024 11:31:36 GMT
Shouting. Anyway, people can take the info as they want I guess. Pretty sure his sources are aware of what and how much he shares, plus any spin. It'll dry up if they aren't happy. Being a gossip and a sh** stirrer is another person's verification and validation right? A whistle-blower..thise guys are sh** stirrers in the eyes of the faithful and their rulers. Always question the motivation of the primary source. 👍 Age old political practice - giving /passing on some malignant comment 'in confidence', knowing full well the recipient will straightaway blab it all over the place. |
|
|
|
Post by bluegas on Oct 28, 2024 11:34:44 GMT
Posting info you know on here is pointless. People choose to not believe it even when you have a track record of things being right. Best off not saying anything and not dealing with the stress if it all You don't consider the slightest possibility that there are those who will post a total fabrication? That the average reader is wise to be, let's say, somewhat dubious? |
|
|
|
Post by curlywurly on Oct 28, 2024 11:35:06 GMT
Posting info you know on here is pointless. People choose to not believe it even when you have a track record of things being right. Best off not saying anything and not dealing with the stress if it all Not pointless. Just be prepared to be challenged if there is evidence to the contrary. It's healthy debate as long as it doesn't get personal. |
|
