|
|
Post by inee on Jun 5, 2015 13:48:19 GMT
Bags the only good thing about the catholic religion is they pay you to attend, no other church gives you a wafer and a glass of wine  |
|
|
|
Post by aghast on Jun 6, 2015 20:55:13 GMT
I know for a fact that the moon landings couldn;t hav happened. They need gas for there fuel and theres no gas on the moon so how cuold they hav taken off.? Makes you wonder.
|
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Jun 7, 2015 10:48:37 GMT
I know for a fact that the moon landings couldn;t hav happened. They need gas for there fuel and theres no gas on the moon so how cuold they hav taken off.? Makes you wonder. I'm wondering where my crayons have gone. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2015 11:11:25 GMT
I know for a fact that the moon landings couldn;t hav happened. They need gas for there fuel and theres no gas on the moon so how cuold they hav taken off.? Makes you wonder. You don't need fuel to fake the moon landing. |
|
|
|
Post by aghast on Jun 7, 2015 20:35:04 GMT
I know for a fact that the moon landings couldn;t hav happened. They need gas for there fuel and theres no gas on the moon so how cuold they hav taken off.? Makes you wonder. I'm wondering where my crayons have gone. One's left on the moon as proof they went there. You know where you've hidden the other. |
|
|
|
Post by inee on Jun 8, 2015 10:30:47 GMT
i'm still not sure on the moon landings, as no one else have managed to do it, and i find it hard to believe a craft made it using less processing power than a car dashboard, think a zx81 had more power than nasa
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2015 14:21:17 GMT
They've admitted faking some of the later missions haven't they.
|
|
|
|
Post by inee on Jun 8, 2015 19:49:30 GMT
They've admitted faking some of the later missions haven't they. Missed that got a few links fella |
|
|
|
Post by aghast on Jun 9, 2015 21:06:43 GMT
Get out of here you lot. 200,000 NASA employees involved in the biggest conspiracy in world history and nobody, even those who were sacked, didn't speak up? Watch this if you want to debunk the myths. At 48 mins it's a bit long, but v. interesting. |
|
|
|
Post by inee on Jun 9, 2015 21:22:33 GMT
yer but why has nobody else landed , interesting point you make about the number of employees, it only takes 3 or 4 to pull stuff off , again how did they know the amount of fuel food oxygen to take etc, a lot just doesnt add up.
Things are faked all the time for propaganda, dont forget the yanks and ruskies were both trying to get there at the time, so why did the ruskies never land
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2015 13:07:11 GMT
I know for a fact that the moon landings couldn;t hav happened. They need gas for there fuel and theres no gas on the moon so how cuold they hav taken off.? Makes you wonder. Call me daft but didn't they just take contained fuel with them?  or am I missing something obvious? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2015 14:57:50 GMT
Get out of here you lot. 200,000 NASA employees involved in the biggest conspiracy in world history and nobody, even those who were sacked, didn't speak up? Watch this if you want to debunk the myths. At 48 mins it's a bit long, but v. interesting. It's entirely plausible that NASA employees thought they were taking part in real landings and that only a handful knew the thing never actually landed. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2015 5:13:27 GMT
Get out of here you lot. 200,000 NASA employees involved in the biggest conspiracy in world history and nobody, even those who were sacked, didn't speak up? Watch this if you want to debunk the myths. At 48 mins it's a bit long, but v. interesting. It's entirely plausible that NASA employees thought they were taking part in real landings and that only a handful knew the thing never actually landed. Got to disagree with you Hugo. There were many many very intelligent people working on this project. I think it would have been virtually impossible to pull the wool over so many inquiring eyes/minds. |
|
|
|
Post by supergas on Jun 13, 2015 0:40:30 GMT
yer but why has nobody else landed , interesting point you make about the number of employees, it only takes 3 or 4 to pull stuff off , again how did they know the amount of fuel food oxygen to take etc, a lot just doesnt add up. Things are faked all the time for propaganda, dont forget the yanks and ruskies were both trying to get there at the time, so why did the ruskies never land Faked or not, no one else (Government or private company) wants to spend the cash to get there second... ...and to go back to the faked thing for a minute...the Russians were at most a year behind the US because they had a fab network of spys who were stealing all the technical info. They abandoned the program right after the first landing, which means they knew it was genuine and they knew there was no point going there themselves - because they had the technology (nearly, they only had to steal a bit more) and if they could have done they would have loved to have landed at the same spot the US did and show the world there was nothing there. Hell, they could have landed anywhere on the moon and said to the world there was nothing there...trouble is the US either did it or faked it so well they knew no one else could prove that they didn't... |
|
|
|
Post by inee on Jun 13, 2015 12:16:16 GMT
theres lots to find on the ruskie space program, theres a few things out there that say the russians knew they could not do it so after a bit of postulating to the world ,abandoned their program as they believed it was impossible to do, which is entirely possible, but at the same time we have to remember nasa had most of the top german rocket scientists ,the russians had the rest, also can't remember the guys name but the yanks had one of the top german propagandaists.
Another thing i think leads to the claim of fakery is the ISS surely it would have made more sense to build a base on the moon rather than a space station ,as then the moon could be researched, and surely a moonbase would have been a cheaper option as it would be anchored on a big rock.
|
|
|
|
Post by inee on Jun 13, 2015 12:19:10 GMT
I know for a fact that the moon landings couldn;t hav happened. They need gas for there fuel and theres no gas on the moon so how cuold they hav taken off.? Makes you wonder. Call me daft but didn't they just take contained fuel with them? or am I missing something obvious?  . yup focus on the word couldn;t then read aghasts next post, he's starting a conspiracy he is |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2015 13:03:16 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by inee on Jun 13, 2015 13:19:25 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by aghast on Jun 13, 2015 15:21:39 GMT
I read a bit and gave up in despair as I always do with these things. I do like the opening line though: It certainly isn't well-known, I agree. I also love the idea that NASA, with its millions of dollars and cutting edge technology, failed to properly erase all the images of the alien towers and buildings. They just blurred them a bit and thought "That'll do. No-one will spot them". |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2015 15:43:30 GMT
I love me some conspiracy.
|
|
