|
Post by Topper Gas on Jul 21, 2014 18:18:09 GMT
Nick says they need IT skills on the board But why do they have to be on the board? Several highly skilled fans have offered their help in this field. Couldn't make it up! To assist with social media etc seems a fair point, but is it just It skills required or do you also need a big bank balance?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2014 18:34:19 GMT
NH: The new stadium will be 100% owned by BRFC.
|
|
|
Post by newmarketgas on Jul 21, 2014 19:11:26 GMT
Sounds good.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2014 19:21:33 GMT
Well, if the Twitter feed is anything to go by I am seeing nothing new from the BOD.
Confirmed all 5 stadium parties are in a binding contract. Guess that's good news.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo Admin on Jul 21, 2014 19:22:41 GMT
Not only that.
Sainsburys said theyre not pulling out, there is a legally binding contract so they cant.
stunning good news!
|
|
|
Post by newmarketgas on Jul 21, 2014 19:23:41 GMT
Thanks Hugo, at least things seem ok on the stadium front, we really do need it so badly.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2014 19:25:55 GMT
if there was a legally binding contract why were all the councillors getting so paniced a month ago.... surely they would have had this information.... it's such a hatchet job if they didn't know....
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Jul 21, 2014 19:26:55 GMT
Not only that. Sainsburys said theyre not pulling out, there is a legally binding contract so they cant. stunning good news! The Problem Ras is the issue was with UWE not Sainsbury
|
|
|
Post by gretschgas on Jul 21, 2014 19:29:43 GMT
Nick says they need IT skills on the board
|
|
|
Post by newmarketgas on Jul 21, 2014 19:29:45 GMT
Henbury, like what ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2014 19:32:25 GMT
Ok. I can say this openly now. NH says no interest in the club. The new Oxford owner wanted in but was knocked back. They were also approached by a group before relegation but knocked them back and they now own a L2 team. There is much BS going on. Kind of glad I have hives. I would not be able to listen to the crap being spouted. If they have a " watertight" contract with Sainsbury then why did they ask them if they would pull out ? Think about that.
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Jul 21, 2014 19:34:16 GMT
|
|
|
Post by newmarketgas on Jul 21, 2014 19:36:19 GMT
Ok mate
|
|
|
Post by RD on Jul 21, 2014 19:37:02 GMT
Ok. I can say this openly now. NH says no interest in the club. The new Oxford owner wanted in but was knocked back. They were also approached by a group before relegation but knocked them back and they now own a L2 team. There is much BS going on. Kind of glad I have hives. I would not be able to listen to the crap being spouted. If they have a " watertight" contract with Sainsbury then why did they ask them if they would pull out ? Think about that. Not trying to defend the BoD and not saying you are wrong KP, but just to play devil's advocate... Charlotte Leslie et al wrote for re-assurances Sainsbury's would not pull out.... not just because of BRFC but the bigger picture; jobs etc. So in fairness, whilst we'd be covered through financial compensation in the form of penalties should Sainsbury's pull out, in terms of the bigger picture as far as Bristol is concerned (jobs etc) there'd be no "compensation" there - hence why Charlotte Leslie and co would still be concerned regardless of whether or not BRFC were covered. So it is possible the BoD are telling the truth and that the contract is watertight. Ultimately no contract can be truly watertight as nobody can be FORCED to fulfil it but it could well be as watertight as is humanly possible - and there would be very significant (financial) penalties should they pull out. As I say, not necessarily disagreeing with you, but just adding another view point.
|
|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on Jul 21, 2014 19:48:37 GMT
Not only that. Sainsburys said theyre not pulling out, there is a legally binding contract so they cant. stunning good news! The Problem Ras is the issue was with UWE not Sainsbury What was it?
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Jul 21, 2014 19:49:53 GMT
The Problem Ras is the issue was with UWE not Sainsbury What was it? UWE want to change the goal posts if you get my drift
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jul 21, 2014 19:50:17 GMT
Ok. I can say this openly now. NH says no interest in the club. The new Oxford owner wanted in but was knocked back. They were also approached by a group before relegation but knocked them back and they now own a L2 team. There is much BS going on. Kind of glad I have hives. I would not be able to listen to the crap being spouted. If they have a " watertight" contract with Sainsbury then why did they ask them if they would pull out ? Think about that. KP it doesn't say no interest on the twitter feed just he's met people and it hasn't happened, it could be the prospective owners wanted the club on the cheap. If we did approach Sainsbury's I assume that means the contracts are watertight as otherwise he'd simply tell them the deals off!
|
|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on Jul 21, 2014 20:02:18 GMT
UWE want to change the goal posts if you get my drift 50,000 seats?!
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Jul 21, 2014 20:06:55 GMT
UWE want to change the goal posts if you get my drift 50,000 seats?! more like 50,000 car park spaces....
|
|
|
Post by lulworthgas on Jul 21, 2014 20:20:58 GMT
UWE want to change the goal posts if you get my drift Rugby posts?
|
|