Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2015 19:28:27 GMT
So they can out bid the highest bidder and then turn around 6 months later and say they couldnt raise the money....really? I doubt that Dave. Surely when you apply to purchase such a large asset you need to prove funds are in place...... Right? Someone? It specifically says that they have six months to raise the funds.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2015 19:31:34 GMT
Ok fair enough. Thanks Nobby. So this is a dead cert to happen now whatever the future plan is. Unless its development of the ground of course!
|
|
|
Post by inee on Nov 24, 2015 20:56:16 GMT
Is Radice still something to do with Sport on the Bristol Council? What an utter disgrace she is! To be fair this is to protect sport in Bristol and thus part of her remit To be even fairer this is to make a non bristolian cuntfaced fuckwit, look important to her party of incompetent asshats whose only agenda is the total destruction of this country by combined stupidity
|
|
|
Post by inee on Nov 24, 2015 21:03:09 GMT
Another reason why anyone who votes Green Party seriously needs to be treated for some sort of mental defects. Since the dimp bird raised her head with trash ,i've said to everyone read their manifesto and see just how dangerous these pretend wannabe politicians really are not just to the uk but worldwide, if people want to see how they operate search google for party members thrown out as on the one hand they say no one should be hassled for their beliefs then expel a christian woman for her beliefs you couldnt make it up, also remember this is a party who seem to get a wide on whenever a counciller get arrested, total and utter scumbags the lot of em. Still in the unlikely event of them ever gaining power we wont have to try and protect the earth for future generations as there wont be any left alive.
|
|
|
Post by inee on Nov 24, 2015 21:03:59 GMT
I do wonder how this dropped below the radar until somebody posted a link to it in last night's B Post. "The Ground remains the city’s largest and, in many ways most effective and poignant, war memorial. It has been an under appreciated jewel in the crown of the Horfield/Bishopston area." Perhaps if they seriously think that's the case they could pay the £15m+ to rebuild the Mem? Although they still seem to want to knock the Mem down anyway... ...welcome imaginative ideas about possible alternative future uses, which keep (at the very least) the playing pitch area for sport, games, or recreation, such as a school, or retirement homes, sport rehabilitation, or even a velodrome. Since when did any of those examples, other than a school, use a sports pitch?? simple snuck in by her on the quite, probably slipped onto a friends desk
|
|
|
Post by amgas on Nov 24, 2015 23:06:46 GMT
I also thought it had been agreed already that the memorial gates are the war memorial not the whole run down stadium.
|
|
|
Post by Big Jock on Nov 24, 2015 23:09:25 GMT
I also thought it had been agreed already that the memorial gates are the war memorial not the whole run down stadium.
|
|
|
Post by amgas on Nov 24, 2015 23:26:35 GMT
What are you trying to say with the image ? I think it had been discussed in great detail as part of the Sainsburys plan and it was agreed by the likes of the British Legion that the memorial gates were the important part to preserve, hence the memorial gardens plan. If the whole ground is a war memorial why did Bristol RFC get to build houses all over it with little or no complaint from anyone?
|
|
|
Post by justin blue on Nov 26, 2015 18:34:58 GMT
Ok fair enough. Thanks Nobby. So this is a dead cert to happen now whatever the future plan is. Unless its development of the ground of course! The board have 8 weeks to seek a review of the decision.
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Nov 26, 2015 19:10:43 GMT
Ok fair enough. Thanks Nobby. So this is a dead cert to happen now whatever the future plan is. Unless its development of the ground of course! The board have 8 weeks to seek a review of the decision. Why didn't they challenge it in the first place, incompetence or is NH so confident it's a done deal with Sainsbury's he doesn't need to worry about AVC status? It seems all a bit meaningless to me as there's no way anybody is going to pay £15m to just preserve the pitch/gates?
|
|
|
Post by justin blue on Nov 26, 2015 19:22:08 GMT
The board have 8 weeks to seek a review of the decision. Why didn't they challenge it in the first place, incompetence or is NH so confident it's a done deal with Sainsbury's he doesn't need to worry about AVC status? It seems all a bit meaningless to me as there's no way anybody is going to pay £15m to just preserve the pitch/gates? NH should have been made aware when the nomination was made I can't understand why it has not been put in the public domain until now
|
|
|
Post by newmarketgas on Nov 26, 2015 19:25:41 GMT
I do wonder if the Greens would play by the rules here, they never have yet! I don't expect anyone knew this was coming.
|
|
|
Post by Finnish Gas on Nov 26, 2015 19:48:03 GMT
At least we have the consolation that no-one in Bristol (including the Greens) thinks Ashton Gate is an Asset of Community Value.
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Nov 26, 2015 19:51:02 GMT
I do wonder if the Greens would play by the rules here, they never have yet! I don't expect anyone knew this was coming. Not true, BCC have a duty to inform the interested party of their plans, in order that they have an opportunity to challenge them. Although, we have no evidence that Rovers haven't challenge the plans.
|
|
|
Post by justin blue on Nov 26, 2015 20:03:47 GMT
Maybe NH is not going to contest this because if the listing is upheld it will be another humiliation. However we are in good company as Old Trafford is also listed.
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Nov 26, 2015 20:09:27 GMT
I can't imagine Old Trafford will be knocked down anytime soon for redevelopment!!
|
|
|
Post by justin blue on Nov 26, 2015 20:21:23 GMT
I can't imagine Old Trafford will be knocked down anytime soon for redevelopment!! Old Trafford was nominated by MU supporters trust one of their reasons being to protect the ground from being sold without their knowledge.
|
|
|
Post by newmarketgas on Nov 26, 2015 21:06:53 GMT
I do wonder if the Greens would play by the rules here, they never have yet! I don't expect anyone knew this was coming. Not true, BCC have a duty to inform the interested party of their plans, in order that they have an opportunity to challenge them. Although, we have no evidence that Rovers haven't challenge the plans. True, they have a duty, but that does not mean they would feel they needed to do things the correct way. They had a duty to remove rubbish in Brighton, what did they do ? They joined the rubbish collectors on the picket lines to protest against the council that they run ! That is how the Greens go about business. All said and done I would hope they did tell us but maybe it got lost in translation.
|
|
|
Post by aghast on Nov 26, 2015 21:50:23 GMT
They might be hated, but they are pretty formidable foes. Knock 'em down, they rise again. Never surrender. I don't like what they are doing to us, but I have to admire their determination and skill.
I suppose having a bunch of Green lawyers working for them for free helps a little.
|
|
|
Post by Jon the Stripe on Nov 26, 2015 22:29:08 GMT
Listening to Nick tonight and reading the info in the public domain i don't think this will really have a huge bearing on us in the grand scale of things if at all - UTG
|
|