|
|
Post by lpgas on Jan 2, 2017 19:03:04 GMT
Has no one ever told you that the moment you swear you lose the argument? That's f**king bollocks, though. Loser  |
|
|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on Jan 2, 2017 19:04:43 GMT
What was Locks doing again as surely it's the captain's role to sort out the defence, particularly when he's the right sided CB so must have realised Leads was off the pitch? Said exactly this at the game. It was so basic what Charlton did. Just took advantage of where we were a man light. The lack of communication is costing us so many goals and it's infuriating. |
|
|
|
Post by pirate49 on Jan 2, 2017 19:12:09 GMT
Is it any wonder that Charlton came on strong to us in the second half?
Our midfield played the full 90 minutes and consisted of
Moore(28) Lawrence(35) Mansell(34) Sinclair(29)
Moore has flair but is inconsistent; Sinclair runs around a lot and is bound
to tire as the match goes on.
The defence may have made the final errors, but that midfield was just wrong!
|
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jan 2, 2017 19:14:55 GMT
We were in grave danger of losing today as soon as the Team sheet went up with the inclusion of Lawrence and Mansell who both had virtually no match minutes this Season. This is no way to give confidence to a Team who have been frail at the back even in some games we have won. DC made no mention of his bizarre selection today and perhaps he should have more faith in the fitness of Lines, O.Clarke and Bodin to play 1 and a half to 2 games in two days. You should play those who are in form before playing those who are rusty because we ended up beating ourselves today. 100% agree. can't just look at the defenders today, stuck a shambles of a midfield in front if them. But how can you blame our midfield for letting in the first two goals from set pieces, when we weren't under any great pressure and then falling asleep when Leads went off injured? Whilst everybody is giving DC stick for so many changes, including me before the match, did they actually cost us the first 3 goals? As far as LPGas why does he only appear on here criticising DC when we lose? He must be a troll or WUM? |
|
|
|
Post by oviedista on Jan 2, 2017 19:17:06 GMT
Is it any wonder that Charlton came on strong to us in the second half? Our midfield played the full 90 minutes and consisted of Moore(28) Lawrence(35) Mansell(34) Sinclair(29) Moore has flair but is inconsistent; Sinclair runs around a lot and is bound to tire as the match goes on. The defence may have made the final errors, but that midfield was just wrong! 4 players over 33 ok. 28 and 29?? Irrelevant. 28 is when players supposedly peak. |
|
|
|
Post by syg on Jan 2, 2017 19:23:52 GMT
Omg. Just seen the goals. Not much else I can say.
|
|
|
|
Post by dragonfly on Jan 2, 2017 19:35:18 GMT
100% agree. can't just look at the defenders today, stuck a shambles of a midfield in front if them. But how can you blame our midfield for letting in the first two goals from set pieces, when we weren't under any great pressure and then falling asleep when Leads went off injured? Whilst everybody is giving DC stick for so many changes, including me before the match, did they actually cost us the first 3 goals? As far as LPGas why does he only appear on here criticising DC when we lose? He must be a troll or WUM? I would argue that O.Clarke would have had more defensive input than Mansell and Lawrence with their very limited minutes. The result may well have been the same but we started with a considerable handicap. |
|
|
|
Post by worrelsterlingalbion on Jan 2, 2017 19:36:06 GMT
I don't post much & didn't go today but can't believe some of the stuff written on here before & after game. Before the Wimbledon game people were crying out for Mansell to play & now he's too old. Then apparently our midfield is too blame for the opposition danger man being given 2 free headers for 1st 2 goals even though he's being picked up by Lockyer. Defend that properly & the game is completely different. We've been done by set pieces today which as much as it might dissapoint those that magically appear after a defeat isn't something the manager can control.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2017 19:52:11 GMT
I don't post much & didn't go today but can't believe some of the stuff written on here before & after game. Before the Wimbledon game people were crying out for Mansell to play & now he's too old. Then apparently our midfield is too blame for the opposition danger man being given 2 free headers for 1st 2 goals even though he's being picked up by Lockyer. Defend that properly & the game is completely different. We've been done by set pieces today which as much as it might dissapoint those that magically appear after a defeat isn't something the manager can control. Best username award and good post |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2017 19:52:17 GMT
Thought Charlton looked proper average the first half hour, thought we may be able to get a result. Seemed to turn it on a bit the second half but still not great. Repeat of Millwall for me. We barely threatened. Nice to see us knocking it about a bit but we didn't do anything with it. Shocking defending for the goals, desperately need a commanding keeper.
Lawrence was f**ked after half an hour. I like mansell and it was good to see his passion. Thought it was a bit rich him having a go at puddy after a free kick which he didn't collect, the free kick given away by mansell for a silly trip cos he didn't have the legs to get back and make a proper tackle.
Bizarre decision the starting line up. Almost as though the away games are now for experiementing as we can rely on our home form. Bottom line is we may be winning at home this season but the performances are far from polished there tbh.
|
|
|
|
Post by justin blue on Jan 2, 2017 19:52:50 GMT
I don't post much & didn't go today but can't believe some of the stuff written on here before & after game. Before the Wimbledon game people were crying out for Mansell to play & now he's too old. Then apparently our midfield is too blame for the opposition danger man being given 2 free headers for 1st 2 goals even though he's being picked up by Lockyer. Defend that properly & the game is completely different. We've been done by set pieces today which as much as it might dissapoint those that magically appear after a defeat isn't something the manager can control. Agree with most what you say exept that dealing with set pieces is something that should be in the managers training schedule. |
|
|
|
Post by worrelsterlingalbion on Jan 2, 2017 19:58:40 GMT
I don't post much & didn't go today but can't believe some of the stuff written on here before & after game. Before the Wimbledon game people were crying out for Mansell to play & now he's too old. Then apparently our midfield is too blame for the opposition danger man being given 2 free headers for 1st 2 goals even though he's being picked up by Lockyer. Defend that properly & the game is completely different. We've been done by set pieces today which as much as it might dissapoint those that magically appear after a defeat isn't something the manager can control. Agree with most what you say exept that dealing with set pieces is something that should be in the managers training schedule. Completely agree but once the game starts there's nothing any manager can do if Lockyer in this case loses his man twice and both times the ball ends up in our net. Unfortunately at moment we are too easy to score against teams don't have to work for their goals. |
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Jan 2, 2017 20:00:59 GMT
100% agree. can't just look at the defenders today, stuck a shambles of a midfield in front if them. But how can you blame our midfield for letting in the first two goals from set pieces, when we weren't under any great pressure and then falling asleep when Leads went off injured? Whilst everybody is giving DC stick for so many changes, including me before the match, did they actually cost us the first 3 goals? As far as LPGas why does he only appear on here criticising DC when we lose? He must be a troll or WUM? Topper Gas have a point. If you go through LP Gas's posts, they are all bloody negative and appears after a loss. If you can't be positive about our club with how things have been the last couple of years then you may as well give it up as a hobby. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2017 20:02:12 GMT
I don't post much & didn't go today but can't believe some of the stuff written on here before & after game. Before the Wimbledon game people were crying out for Mansell to play & now he's too old. Then apparently our midfield is too blame for the opposition danger man being given 2 free headers for 1st 2 goals even though he's being picked up by Lockyer. Defend that properly & the game is completely different. We've been done by set pieces today which as much as it might dissapoint those that magically appear after a defeat isn't something the manager can control. Agree with most what you say exept that dealing with set pieces is something that should be in the managers training schedule. According to DC we have worked on defending a lot lately and players were given their men to mark today, unfortunately Lockyer seemed to forget what he was told. |
|
|
|
Post by paulpirate on Jan 2, 2017 20:10:11 GMT
Anyone know where I can find the radio Bristol phone ins after the games today?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2017 20:12:27 GMT
Anyone know where I can find the radio Bristol phone ins after the games today? go to the radio bristol website main page, should be a link to Saturday sport there. |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Jan 2, 2017 20:12:52 GMT
What's odd is, from memory anyway, that we concede so few goals at home from set pieces, in fact we generally concede few goals at home if we ignore the Charlton game/Roos errors but away from home it's must be averaging 3 a game recently?
What I can't understand is why DC made so many changes today when Charlton made just two, I'd have thought snatching a late 1-1 at Southend was a damn sight harder for their players than our 2:0 win at home to Wimbledon. Whilst DC gets a lot right he seems to make some bizarre decisions at times did he take a loss today in the hope we win next week and make it 3 wins out of the last 4 matches?
Charlton team today:
13Phillips
20Solly
50Teixeira
5Bauer
21Fox
8Crofts
15Konsa
32Aribo
3Chicksen
14Botaka
9 Magennis
Charlton team at Southend:
13Phillips
15Konsa
5Bauer
50Teixeira
21Fox
32Aribo
8Crofts
17Ulvestad
3Chicksen
10Ajose
9Magennis
|
|
|
|
Post by toddy1953 on Jan 2, 2017 20:20:12 GMT
I don't post much & didn't go today but can't believe some of the stuff written on here before & after game. Before the Wimbledon game people were crying out for Mansell to play & now he's too old. Then apparently our midfield is too blame for the opposition danger man being given 2 free headers for 1st 2 goals even though he's being picked up by Lockyer. Defend that properly & the game is completely different. We've been done by set pieces today which as much as it might dissapoint those that magically appear after a defeat isn't something the manager can control. Good sense, you ought to post more  In my view I would also add that today's game & the effects of playing twice in 48 hours is greatly underestimated by a lot of people. Granted players are fitter & pitches are better than yesteryears, but the pace of today's game & the scrutiny of individuals add to fatigue & whilst all the new gadgets nowadays show when players have run theirselves into the ground it doesn't show their mental state & with mental fatigue comes lack in concentration & brings mistakes. There is a case against Locks today for 2-3 goals where he wasn't switched on to the situation around him. If we don't get some experience in at this level or higher, I would like to see McC back in a 3 man central defence, especially in away games to help him out confidence wise & possibly take over the captaincy for a few games. We have shipped too many goals & we have looked jittery at the back most of the season, DC knows this & I am sure he will sort it. |
|
|
|
Post by markczgas on Jan 2, 2017 20:32:34 GMT
Is it any wonder that Charlton came on strong to us in the second half? Our midfield played the full 90 minutes and consisted of Moore(28) Lawrence(35) Mansell(34) Sinclair(29) Moore has flair but is inconsistent; Sinclair runs around a lot and is bound to tire as the match goes on. The defence may have made the final errors, but that midfield was just wrong! but on the flip side that midfield was very fresh |
|
|
|
Post by Gas Go Marching In on Jan 2, 2017 20:53:42 GMT
Oh f off you negative *****!!! Moan Moan bloody moan! So where is the DC that has got us to 10th in league one! Jesus Christ. I apologise to everyone else but negative bullshit like this gets my back up. Has no one ever told you that the moment you swear you lose the argument? I also doubt you would say it to my face. I am entitled to my view, and my view is that DC let all those supporters who went to day down by choosing the wrong players. And goalies? Tell me, without using the f word, because it is slang for sexual intercourse, and I really don't want to with you, but tell me what goalkeeper Clarke has got in that has been classed as good? Remember Mildenhall was not Clarkes player. You are entitled to your view but your posts are negtivity are negativity. If you reflect on that then considering we have 2 promotions and are top hlf of league one then you must have some sort of bias against DC doing so well? Yes DC hasn't signed a decent goalkeeper yet but he hasn't got a lot wrong during his time here. |
|
