|
Post by contradiction on Jun 5, 2018 12:46:26 GMT
Some of this thread is priceless
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jun 5, 2018 13:35:59 GMT
|
|
|
Post by oldgas on Jun 5, 2018 15:38:52 GMT
Was the grass actually growing, or was it just stood around in the field doing nothing? The Move. Please. You have to be of a certain age. I am and I also see rainbows in the sky.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2018 15:40:33 GMT
The Move. Please. You have to be of a certain age. I am and I also see rainbows in the sky. Ban!
|
|
|
Post by piratesquarters on Jun 5, 2018 16:44:45 GMT
The Move. Please. You have to be of a certain age. I am and I also see rainbows in the sky. Any comment I make will likely be lyric based.
|
|
|
Post by cj on Jun 5, 2018 19:06:32 GMT
Umm, I wasn't have a go at some posters because I disagree with them or that their style wasn't for me. I was having a go at some posters for their constant obvious BS that they spread due to clearly having hidden agenda.
But... wow... an entire post (by you) created to have a dig at an individual poster (me) whose post you disagree with or isn't for you. Indeed what a totally cunty thing to do
Thanks anyway!
PS... I am not the first person to do it and I wont by the last person to do it either. I wonder if you have challenged everyone in the past and will continue to challenge everyone who has a dig at other posters. I doubt it. So why single me out? That's a rhetorical question by the way. No need to answer it.
Most respond directly to their posts rather than singling them out in a needless thread that serves only to attack posters. I think the mods will agree I have been painfully consistent in challenging those who break forum rules by attacking posters. I stand by my original point. A totally cunty thing to post. Indeed most do respond direct to them, which includes me. Does that work? No. They still spout their BS. As for needless threads, that should count for 99% of their threads which is only designed to spread negative thoughts towards the club. Do you attack them for their needless threads which do more harm than good? Nope!
As for you being consistent in challenging those who break forum rules, I guess the only consistency being shown by you is your lack of consistency, as I can easily point towards several thread that attack other posters and you haven't challenged sh**!
End of the day, if I have broken a forum rule, I would hope a mod would send me a PM about it. I have yet to receive one or been banned. I guess they wouldn't have many posters left as there are so many on here who do the same and even worse. Bare in mind, I dont actually attack posters if you look at my very short history of commenting. However, I've just had enough of complete and utter BS.
You can stand by your original cunty point princess. As will I.
|
|
|
Post by cj on Jun 5, 2018 19:17:11 GMT
IMO the hostile reaction of some posters to the opinions which Gasincider and Severncider express is brought about by insecurity. If the posters had genuine confidence that there is a plan and everything is going according to that plan then the doubts which Gasincider and Severncider raise would simply be ignored. Partly true and many do ignore them. What I do see though is a narrative being written by some especially since the UWE collapse that the al-Qadis are charlatans with alterior motives and yet many of the suggestions or accusations made since August have not come to light. The tone of writing is also something that frustrates many, for example the suggestion of players not being paid. On both forums there are those who will not accept them and are expecting or hoping new owners to take over. Someone on Gasheads in December suggested they would be gone in January and good ridence. BS5 got very angry with anyone who asked questions of him. They are still here and so far look like they are not going just yet. By all means be critical but the posting of random comments only to inflame feelings and generate distrust does nothing to enhance debate. For these reasons and more, many are feeling aggrieved. It is like the story of the boy who called wolf. We have read so many posts that the credibility of some has been lost and if ever something genuine happens that we need to know about I'm afraid it will be dismissed as another attempt to undermine and divide. The burden of proof is on the poster, those of us who have not contact with the internal workings of the club deserve better. Good post.
|
|
|
Post by cj on Jun 5, 2018 19:24:28 GMT
You could have easily did this for this thread. Maybe you did but got ignored. Or maybe you didn't (showing hypocrisy) and wanted to rather attack the poster (again showing hypocrisy) and a wanky thing to do
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jun 5, 2018 19:27:43 GMT
|
|
|
Post by cj on Jun 5, 2018 19:28:58 GMT
Yes. Nose-bleed moral high ground marinated with foul-mouthery. Unappetising. The op was a parody. Imitation for humorous effect. It amused me. Clearly not you. Hope you get a laugh somewhere today. Ciao. Exactly what it was. Got a point across too and it has actually brought up a discussion about how fed up posters are about constant BS. Its gone above some peoples head of course who insist on taking the moral high ground!
Thanks for allowing me to amuse you
|
|
|
Post by cj on Jun 5, 2018 19:35:50 GMT
Apologies for any offence caused by my use of language. My issue is that the thread clearly breaks forum rules...but as long as everyone gets a laugh that's ok! It breaks no more rules than you did in your response to it. Gasincider was not mentioned personally and he is not the only poster who the OP could have applied to. We've been down this road before and I have been down it in the past with other posters. If someones posting style is to inflame and tease then frankly it becomes much much harder to defend them when people give some back. It works both ways. People have had a pop at GI, Topper, Lord Justice, GGMI, Antonio etc... The list goes on and on. All of those posters listed are forthright and opinionated at times and as a result open themselves up to a little parody. When it goes over the top Mods have and will step in but the OP of this thread was clearly just taking the water out of all the so called ITK posters who have told us stuff that turned out to be nonsense and at the people spreading gloom about every little thing. Sorry for my lateness. Im catching up as wasn't around yesterday.
I appreciate your comment and your point. Also I appreciate that fact that you understood what this thread was intended for.
Cheers
|
|
|
Post by cj on Jun 5, 2018 19:45:55 GMT
If the OP is happy to take the water then I'm sure they are going to survive being called a dick and if they are not, then that's on them!! You can call me a dick if you like
|
|
|
Post by Iliveinbidefordgas on Jun 5, 2018 20:17:31 GMT
If the OP is happy to take the water then I'm sure they are going to survive being called a dick and if they are not, then that's on them!! You can call me a dick if you like dick
|
|
|
Post by cj on Jun 5, 2018 20:28:34 GMT
You can call me a dick if you like dick I didn't say YOU can call me that. I gave Hugo permission. How dare you attack a poster!!!! That's a very cunty and wanky thing to do.
Just kidding of course
|
|
|
Post by LJG on Jun 5, 2018 20:30:31 GMT
I've heard new shirts had to be returned to manufacturer because when Hani tried one on he kept doing that thing where he kept yanking it down and turning round on tip toes to look at his bum then yanking it down again then turning back to the front and fluffing it back up from where he'd yanked it down then turning back round and yanking it over his bum again.
Source says he's not happy and refusing to pay unless they hide his tummy and stop making his bum look massive.
|
|
|
Post by barumgas on Jun 5, 2018 20:41:30 GMT
If the OP is happy to take the water then I'm sure they are going to survive being called a dick and if they are not, then that's on them!! You can call me a dick if you like Dick Dastardly
|
|
|
Post by cj on Jun 5, 2018 20:51:24 GMT
You can call me a dick if you like Dick Dastardly In more ways than one.... apparently
|
|
|
Post by gasify on Jun 6, 2018 6:06:55 GMT
I for one thought that the OP was pretty funny. Not because I see it as a dig at an individual, but more as a dig against ALL the naysayers and how there is definitely a glass half empty/full divide happening at Rovers at the moment.
I thought it portrayed in quite a witty way that the powers that be are dammed if they do and dammed if they don't.
I also belong to various Rovers Facebook groups and the divide is exactly the same there.
It must be really difficult running a football club, where the customers think they own the right to tell you what to do.
The signing of Tom Nichols sums it up:
"We never sign proven players, only get the scraps that are left. We cannot afford to buy players as Wael has no money".
"We wasted £350k on a player that scored goals last year for a team in our league, but came up short for us this season. The owners/management are terrible".
I think we knew that the club was in massive financial trouble when the Sainsbury's deal fell through. If there is another option, I am all ears. I would contribute to a Crowd fund to buy the club. However, even that has it's issues. You only have to look at Exeter to see where fickle fans making managerial decisions get you!
|
|
|
Post by philbemmygas on Jun 6, 2018 7:06:12 GMT
The OP was clearly a humorous (in some peoples eyes) tickle at those ITK/ not in the know.
Instead of getting bent out of shape over it, I agree it is a platform to encourage reasonable debate. Orgasmic didn't see the funny side and reacted, he has apologised and that should be the end of it. He is a good bloke who worked hard with a few others to get the planning permission for shamesbury's/UWE over the startline and follows the Gas home and away, for that alone he deserves some lee-way or maybe not.
We is skint innit, sack the bored whale is a fraud et al
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2018 8:05:53 GMT
I've heard new shirts had to be returned to manufacturer because when I tried one on I kept doing that thing where I kept yanking it down and turning round on tip toes to look at my bum then yanking it down again then turning back to the front and fluffing it back up from where I'd yanked it down then turning back round and yanking it over my bum again. I'm not happy and refusing to pay unless they hide my tummy and stop making my bum look massive. You're really talking about yourself here aren't you ! Fixed it for you.
|
|