|
Post by Topper Gas on Aug 30, 2022 11:33:12 GMT
I also hope they review the hand into Marquis face recently whilst he was flat on his back. They only have to watch the EFL highlights programme to see it. By the sounds of it, in order to retrospectively punish an offence the referee must completely miss the incident in the game. The referee from the Oxford game deals with the marquis incident at the time and deemed it not worthy of a red, so, rightly or wrongly, don't think they would be able to go back now? Surely the ref dealt with this incident as he spoke to both players at length before the fee kick for the off side was taken. If both the ref and the linesman on the West Stand side missed it, then they both need to visit Specsavers this week.
|
|
|
Post by bidefordgas on Aug 30, 2022 11:42:54 GMT
By the sounds of it, in order to retrospectively punish an offence the referee must completely miss the incident in the game. The referee from the Oxford game deals with the marquis incident at the time and deemed it not worthy of a red, so, rightly or wrongly, don't think they would be able to go back now? Surely the ref dealt with this incident as he spoke to both players at length before the fee kick for the off side was taken. If both the ref and the linesman on the West Stand side missed it, then they both need to visit Specsavers this week. Exactly topper and on the video you see Rossitor go and talk to the linesman.
|
|
|
Post by gasmania on Aug 30, 2022 12:23:38 GMT
By the sounds of it, in order to retrospectively punish an offence the referee must completely miss the incident in the game. The referee from the Oxford game deals with the marquis incident at the time and deemed it not worthy of a red, so, rightly or wrongly, don't think they would be able to go back now? Surely the ref dealt with this incident as he spoke to both players at length before the fee kick for the off side was taken. If both the ref and the linesman on the West Stand side missed it, then they both need to visit Specsavers this week. Not saying I agree with it at all but, presumably the ref/linesman have said in their reports that they didnt see the elbow specifically. Must have just been dealing with the aftermath not fully aware of what caused the commotion? Just trying to make some sense out of it haha
|
|
mj
Youth Team
Posts: 75
|
Post by mj on Aug 30, 2022 15:59:15 GMT
I love the way all those including me close by say there was nothing in it yet those watching a video further away know better and already decided he is guilty.We have some strange fans
|
|
|
Post by tbonegas on Aug 30, 2022 16:07:04 GMT
Have watched it over and over. Looks to me like Rossiter punched the ball away from the cheating scumbag Shrewsbury player, who consequently fell to the ground like he had been hit by a bomb from Tyson Fury. If the free kick had not been awarded already, it would have been a yellow for deliberate handball. Let's move on as there is no case to answer.
|
|
|
Post by SleepyGas on Aug 30, 2022 16:07:36 GMT
I love the way all those including me close by say there was nothing in it yet those watching a video further away know better and already decided he is guilty.We have some strange fans I'm sure there are thousands of Gasheads in the ground who would happily testify there was nothing in it... but that won't help overturn the verdict if the FA decide to issue a ban based on the footage they have available
|
|
|
Post by kylegas on Aug 30, 2022 16:11:42 GMT
Have watched it over and over. Looks to me like Rossiter punched the ball away from the cheating scumbag Shrewsbury player, who consequently fell to the ground like he had been hit by a bomb from Tyson Fury. If the free kick had not been awarded already, it would have been a yellow for deliberate handball. Let's move on as there is no case to answer. Looks like he clipped his face in the process but big deal, ridiculous yet typical reaction from a player in todays game
|
|
mj
Youth Team
Posts: 75
|
Post by mj on Aug 30, 2022 16:18:54 GMT
thousands couldnt testify as they would not be close enough to see it.penalties have been given incorrectly by VAR with mutiple cameras to view.The guy did nothing to deserve a ban
|
|
|
Post by lastminutewinner on Aug 30, 2022 16:23:36 GMT
Apparently Steve Cross has been banging on about this incident. He was always a useless twat
|
|
|
Post by eric on Aug 30, 2022 16:27:52 GMT
thousands couldnt testify as they would not be close enough to see it.penalties have been given incorrectly by VAR with mutiple cameras to view.The guy did nothing to deserve a ban He’ll get a ban as the football authorities love getting busy over nothing incidents. In the meantime they will continue to turn a blind eye to the cancer that is tactical feigning of injury and deliberate time wasting which is ruining professional football as an entertainment and will soon be the biggest factor for fans turning their back in favour of other sports.
|
|
|
Post by lastminutewinner on Aug 30, 2022 16:30:28 GMT
thousands couldnt testify as they would not be close enough to see it.penalties have been given incorrectly by VAR with mutiple cameras to view.The guy did nothing to deserve a ban He’ll get a ban as the football authorities love getting busy over nothing incidents. In the meantime they will continue to turn a blind eye to the cancer that is tactical feigning of injury and deliberate time wasting which is ruining professional football as an entertainment and will soon be the biggest factor for fans turning their back in favour of other sports. The worst one was the Rochdale striker who was down injured off the pitch and then dragged himself the 2 feet onto the pitch so the game would be stopped. I laugh at it now but at the time I was fuming
|
|
|
Post by bluegas on Aug 30, 2022 16:39:20 GMT
I love the way all those including me close by say there was nothing in it yet those watching a video further away know better and already decided he is guilty.We have some strange fans I would assume that videos can be photoshopped......
|
|
|
Post by legas on Aug 30, 2022 21:24:40 GMT
Every time I see this thread, I can’t help reading it as the ‘Roswell Incident’. And then I wonder if banning a player for three games based on spurious evidence and dodgy film is ok.
It was a close encounter but that’s all …
|
|
|
Post by Qatar Gas on Aug 31, 2022 4:42:40 GMT
I guess he played the full ninety last night in anticipation of an upcoming three match ban? If he had been shown a straight red on Saturday, then last night would have been his first match out meaning he would have only missed two league games. Now he will miss three!
|
|
|
Post by percy on Aug 31, 2022 5:23:11 GMT
I guess he played the full ninety last night in anticipation of an upcoming three match ban? If he had been shown a straight red on Saturday, then last night would have been his first match out meaning he would have only missed two league games. Now he will miss three! Glad to see him looking fit tho. Assuming coutts evans Finley and McCormick are fit, we aren’t light in that area (plus Lawrence)
|
|
|
Post by SleepyGas on Aug 31, 2022 8:56:24 GMT
I guess he played the full ninety last night in anticipation of an upcoming three match ban? If he had been shown a straight red on Saturday, then last night would have been his first match out meaning he would have only missed two league games. Now he will miss three! I'm not sure if league bans apply to the Papa John's Trophy? Certainly any sanction issued during a PJT fixture does not count towards the league - so I would have thought that the other direction is true too.. " 12 ON FIELD DISCIPLINE 12.1 The Competition is a ‘First Team Competitive Match’ for the purposes of the Football Association’s Regulations for Disciplinary Procedures. However, the automatic sanctions in relation to cautions and dismissals are treated separately under The FA Disciplinary procedures from other First Team matches." www.efl.com/papa-johns-trophy/the-competition/rules/
|
|
|
Post by Qatar Gas on Aug 31, 2022 9:33:10 GMT
I guess he played the full ninety last night in anticipation of an upcoming three match ban? If he had been shown a straight red on Saturday, then last night would have been his first match out meaning he would have only missed two league games. Now he will miss three! I'm not sure if league bans apply to the Papa John's Trophy? Certainly any sanction issued during a PJT fixture does not count towards the league - so I would have thought that the other direction is true too.. " 12 ON FIELD DISCIPLINE 12.1 The Competition is a ‘First Team Competitive Match’ for the purposes of the Football Association’s Regulations for Disciplinary Procedures. However, the automatic sanctions in relation to cautions and dismissals are treated separately under The FA Disciplinary procedures from other First Team matches." www.efl.com/papa-johns-trophy/the-competition/rules/Ok. I think I remember that from before that the pizza cup was treated separately. It doesn't really matter now anyway as he hasn't been banned yet. I expect it'll be dished out before the weekend.
|
|
|
Post by jongas on Aug 31, 2022 12:19:55 GMT
So when that forward attempted to kick Belly's head off his shoulders and no action was taken because the whistle had been blown, how come the same logic is not applied here?
|
|
|
Post by SleepyGas on Aug 31, 2022 14:11:27 GMT
3 match ban for Rossiter then..
|
|
|
Post by bambergashead on Aug 31, 2022 15:36:11 GMT
3 match ban for Rossiter then.. Which just goes to show that cheats do prosper in football. I wonder how JB will react come Saturday...
|
|