|
|
Post by baggins on Jul 31, 2015 12:04:21 GMT
On the 'other site' its rumoured we've been granted the appeal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gas-Ed on Jul 31, 2015 12:05:16 GMT
Oh joy.
|
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Jul 31, 2015 12:07:58 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2015 12:10:48 GMT
On the 'other site' its rumoured we've been granted the appeal. Good news. At least now there will be three judges to cast opinion.Never say never. |
|
|
|
Post by Gas-Ed on Jul 31, 2015 12:14:49 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2015 12:14:55 GMT
Woo woo!
UWE will be up by Xmas!
Arise Sir Nick.
Never in doubt....
Etc
|
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Jul 31, 2015 12:18:23 GMT
Woo woo! UWE will be up by Xmas! Arise Sir Nick. Never in doubt.... Etc Just as well my sarcasm detector has been drinking since 11am. |
|
|
|
Post by CrispPusher on Jul 31, 2015 12:29:01 GMT
Am I correct in thinking this is for an appeal to claim damages rather than for the contract to be enforced?
|
|
|
|
Post by britishgas on Jul 31, 2015 12:32:24 GMT
Am I correct in thinking this is for an appeal to claim damages rather than for the contract to be enforced? Yep. Won't be enough for the UWE, but £5m or so could go a long way in making the Mem a decent stadium, and the rest could go on the debt. Of course, that's if we win, which we won't. |
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Jul 31, 2015 12:35:20 GMT
Am I correct in thinking this is for an appeal to claim damages rather than for the contract to be enforced? I'm not sure that's right. Judge has said we can appeal against the decision (which was not for Sainsburys to pay us full amount) but we can no longer claim expenses for the court case. |
|
|
|
Post by daniel300380 on Jul 31, 2015 12:36:02 GMT
Am I correct in thinking this is for an appeal to claim damages rather than for the contract to be enforced? Yep. Won't be enough for the UWE, but £5m or so could go a long way in making the Mem a decent stadium, and the rest could go on the debt. Of course, that's if we win, which we won't. Is that definite? I know that's what the post said, but they didn't say where they got there information. Surely if we did win the appeal, then Sainsburys would still be under contract to buy the land??? |
|
|
|
Post by truegas on Jul 31, 2015 12:36:09 GMT
YESSS!! DOES THIS MEAN WE GET THE STADIUM!  |
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Jul 31, 2015 12:44:57 GMT
YESSS!! DOES THIS MEAN WE GET THE STADIUM! You're banned no matter what. |
|
|
|
Post by gaelgas on Jul 31, 2015 12:45:37 GMT
Am I correct in thinking this is for an appeal to claim damages rather than for the contract to be enforced? Don't think this is right, the article on the official website states we have been given leave to appeal the original decision as After digesting the initial judgment in full, the club’s lawyers felt the majority of the points which Mrs Justice Proudman was asked to consider, went in favour of the club. It is this insight, and the ambiguity of the initial judgment statement, that has convinced us we have a positive case going forward Sounds like we are appealing to reverse her original decision which would mean Sainsbury's would then be held to the original contract, nothing aboit compensation. |
|
|
|
Post by BishopstonBRFC on Jul 31, 2015 12:46:10 GMT
Am I correct in thinking this is for an appeal to claim damages rather than for the contract to be enforced? Yep. Won't be enough for the UWE, but £5m or so could go a long way in making the Mem a decent stadium, and the rest could go on the debt. Of course, that's if we win, which we won't. I think there's a much better chance of us winning compensation than winning the original court case. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2015 12:53:12 GMT
Timelines on this anybody? Am I going to be sh*tt*ing in a commode before I see a new stadium? Will I be dribbling down my own legs before I see the promised land? Will I be taking my teeth out at night before watching us at a different venue. Im 83 BTW
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Jul 31, 2015 12:58:53 GMT
Timelines on this anybody? Am I going to be sh*tt*ing in a commode before I see a new stadium? Will I be dribbling down my own legs before I see the promised land? Will I be taking my teeth out at night before watching us at a different venue. Im 83 BTW Over 85's will be allowed in our new stadium FOC. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2015 13:01:17 GMT
Timelines on this anybody? Am I going to be sh*tt*ing in a commode before I see a new stadium? Will I be dribbling down my own legs before I see the promised land? Will I be taking my teeth out at night before watching us at a different venue. Im 83 BTW Over 85's will be allowed in our new stadium FOC. FOC you un' all..... |
|
|
|
Post by Centenary Gas on Jul 31, 2015 13:03:08 GMT
Yes Who's paying for it? And while you're at it, whose paying for the giant hole that is the wonga loan, and its £5,000 a week interest... |
|
|
|
Post by LJG on Jul 31, 2015 13:04:47 GMT
Ladies and gentlemen welcome aboard this Wild Speculation Airways flight to Here's-What-I-Recon-ville. During our long haul flight you'll be able to get some spectacular views of the Opinions Posing As Facts Valley and the I'm Not A Lawyer But This Is How It Is Mountains. Our in-flight movie will be The Armchair Judge in which a man in middle age with no legal training posts lot of wildly inaccurate things to an intetnet forum asserting them to be definite fact albeit they have no basis in reality. His catchphrase "I used to send legal letters for a living, trust me" is a hilarious turn for all the family - John Cussack stars.
Ladies and gents we will be experiencing some turbulence during our flight as we pass over the Bay of Bullsh!t so please keep your seat belts fastened at all times. In the meantime please sit back relax and enjoy your trip.
|
|
