|
Post by trojandog on Nov 2, 2016 9:40:02 GMT
Now we are up in the play-off zone, thoughts naturally turn to the actual prospect of promotion to The Championship. But, one of the requirements of being in the Championship is that stadiums must be all-seater by the start of the fourth season in the league. So essentially, the UWE stadium would have to be built within 3 years of promotion.
The Amex stadium in Brighton took 2½ years, as did the MK Dons.
An announcement would be a nice Christmas present.
|
|
|
Post by curlywurly on Nov 2, 2016 9:53:43 GMT
Now we are up in the play-off zone, thoughts naturally turn to the actual prospect of promotion to The Championship. But, one of the requirements of being in the Championship is that stadiums must be all-seater by the start of the fourth season in the league. So essentially, the UWE stadium would have to be built within 3 years of promotion. The Amex stadium in Brighton took 2½ years, as did the MK Dons. An announcement would be a nice Christmas present. Yes that would be nice
|
|
|
Post by wiaww on Nov 2, 2016 9:55:51 GMT
OTIB circle-jerk bait thread.
Having said that I like your optimism! I think that if we’re in the Top Six come Christmas it’s going to get very interesting indeed, both in terms of playing staff and the new stadium. A promotion to the Championship would likely make us a much more attractive prospect to potential investors…
|
|
|
Post by Feeling The Blues on Nov 2, 2016 9:57:41 GMT
If it's going to happen there will likely be an announcement very soon because building has to start by Jan or planning permission will need to be renewed.
If we get promoted to the championship at the Mem I think two temporary stands, one above the away enclosure the other above the home terrace on the other side of the stand on the same side will at least give us a capacity of close to 15,000 enabling us to boost the regular support base ahead of a move.
|
|
|
Post by meader on Nov 2, 2016 10:14:29 GMT
If it's going to happen there will likely be an announcement very soon because building has to start by Jan or planning permission will need to be renewed. If we get promoted to the championship at the Mem I think two temporary stands, one above the away enclosure the other above the home terrace on the other side of the stand on the same side will at least give us a capacity of close to 15,000 enabling us to boost the regular support base ahead of a move. With the strict Health and Safety rules applied for sporting venues, the idea of temporary stands is a non-starter. Although it would be good to get improved capacity for the Mem, we are stuck with a maximum crowd limit of approx. 12,000. This is why we need more urgency in getting the UWE Stadium project up and running ASAP. Crowds are starting to increase with the teams success so we need news on the project NOW! Once again, we are being left behind as many smaller clubs then ours have had new stadia built! The longer talks go on, then I can see the time when the UWE Stadium Project will be abandoned - and we are then back to square one!.
|
|
|
Post by Feeling The Blues on Nov 2, 2016 10:19:07 GMT
If it's going to happen there will likely be an announcement very soon because building has to start by Jan or planning permission will need to be renewed. If we get promoted to the championship at the Mem I think two temporary stands, one above the away enclosure the other above the home terrace on the other side of the stand on the same side will at least give us a capacity of close to 15,000 enabling us to boost the regular support base ahead of a move. With the strict Health and Safety rules applied for sporting venues, the idea of temporary stands is a non-starter. Although it would be good to get improved capacity for the Mem, we are stuck with a maximum crowd limit of approx. 12,000. This is why we need more urgency in getting the UWE Stadium project up and running ASAP. Crowds are starting to increase with the teams success so we need news on the project NOW! Once again, we are being left behind as many smaller clubs then ours have had new stadia built! The longer talks go on, then I can see the time when the UWE Stadium Project will be abandoned - and we are then back to square one!. There are plenty of temporary stands at sporting venues. We have two already, so of course we would be allowed two more, if they were safe, which obviously they would be!
|
|
|
Post by meader on Nov 2, 2016 10:31:14 GMT
With the strict Health and Safety rules applied for sporting venues, the idea of temporary stands is a non-starter. Although it would be good to get improved capacity for the Mem, we are stuck with a maximum crowd limit of approx. 12,000. This is why we need more urgency in getting the UWE Stadium project up and running ASAP. Crowds are starting to increase with the teams success so we need news on the project NOW! Once again, we are being left behind as many smaller clubs then ours have had new stadia built! The longer talks go on, then I can see the time when the UWE Stadium Project will be abandoned - and we are then back to square one!. There are plenty of temporary stands at sporting venues. We have two already, so of course we would be allowed two more, if they were safe, which obviously they would be! Actually, temporary stands would not be safe. A temporary stand would not be allowed to be built above the north end of the east terrace as it would interfere with the turnstiles and the food outlets. As there is always a big queue for people getting food and drink, how would people queue if there is temporary seating in the way? And for the away terrace, there will be nowhere to put new toilets and a food outlet if temporary seating was put above.
Also, going back to my comments regarding the UWE project. It is now 4 years since planning permission was approved. 4 YEARS!!!! No other sporting venue has had to wait so long for the stadium to begin building. 4 YEARS! And we are now just weeks away from 2017. Surely this cant go into a 5th Year? WE NEED ACTION - NOW!!!!
|
|
|
Post by chippenhamgas on Nov 2, 2016 10:39:05 GMT
It's just a bit disappointing that at the q&a there were a lot of positive vibes about the uwe which now seem to have gone flat. A two week feasibility study has drifted into 8. There doesn't seem to be any urgency with the project and urgency is indeed necessary. We can hardly get any more fans into the mem and we aren't even into a proper promotion race yet, the club on the field is moving a lot faster than off it. The importance of uwe is growing by the week, if it isn't delivered we risk losing clarke, taylor etc and all the goodwill that has been built amongst the support base in the last eight months.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2016 10:44:12 GMT
There are plenty of temporary stands at sporting venues. We have two already, so of course we would be allowed two more, if they were safe, which obviously they would be! Actually, temporary stands would not be safe. A temporary stand would not be allowed to be built above the north end of the east terrace as it would interfere with the turnstiles and the food outlets. As there is always a big queue for people getting food and drink, how would people queue if there is temporary seating in the way? And for the away terrace, there will be nowhere to put new toilets and a food outlet if temporary seating was put above.
Also, going back to my comments regarding the UWE project. It is now 4 years since planning permission was approved. 4 YEARS!!!! No other sporting venue has had to wait so long for the stadium to begin building. 4 YEARS! And we are now just weeks away from 2017. Surely this cant go into a 5th Year? WE NEED ACTION - NOW!!!!
But it had to start again when Sainsbury's pulled out,it's the same ground but the finances are totally different and the time scale is really from when our new owners took over.
|
|
|
Post by meader on Nov 2, 2016 10:51:23 GMT
It's just a bit disappointing that at the q&a there were a lot of positive vibes about the uwe which now seem to have gone flat. A two week feasibility study has drifted into 8. There doesn't seem to be any urgency with the project and urgency is indeed necessary. We can hardly get any more fans into the mem and we aren't even into a proper promotion race yet, the club on the field is moving a lot faster than off it. The importance of uwe is growing by the week, if it isn't delivered we risk losing clarke, taylor etc and all the goodwill that has been built amongst the support base in the last eight months. And that's the problem! We get to many promises that never seem to materialize. Also I begin to wonder if The University of the West of England actually want it built! I just have this gut feeling that it could be at least 10 years or even never, that a new venue for Bristol Rovers Football Club will ever be built!
|
|
|
Post by chippenhamgas on Nov 2, 2016 11:03:46 GMT
Ten years?! It's now or never, think wael needs to understand people have been waiting 30 years for this not six months. There isn't a lot of patience out there either. We have momentum but that can quickly be lost.
|
|
|
Post by Antonio Fargas on Nov 2, 2016 11:11:51 GMT
Wael knows people are impatient, and the closer it gets, the more impatient people will become. He hasn't been waiting thirty years, so he will not feel the pain like we do. But istm he will be doing what's best for the long term interests of the club, and so we just have to grin and bear it. Putting pressure on him to rush things through could be, ultimately, counter productive.
|
|
|
Post by Dirt Dogg on Nov 2, 2016 11:14:58 GMT
With the strict Health and Safety rules applied for sporting venues, the idea of temporary stands is a non-starter. Although it would be good to get improved capacity for the Mem, we are stuck with a maximum crowd limit of approx. 12,000. This is why we need more urgency in getting the UWE Stadium project up and running ASAP. Crowds are starting to increase with the teams success so we need news on the project NOW! Once again, we are being left behind as many smaller clubs then ours have had new stadia built! The longer talks go on, then I can see the time when the UWE Stadium Project will be abandoned - and we are then back to square one!. There are plenty of temporary stands at sporting venues. We have two already, so of course we would be allowed two more, if they were safe, which obviously they would be! It's more to do with seats per turnstiles/toilets/stewards etc. To be honest it would be extremely hard for us to fit 2 more temporary stands in.
|
|
|
Post by inee on Nov 2, 2016 11:35:43 GMT
There are plenty of temporary stands at sporting venues. We have two already, so of course we would be allowed two more, if they were safe, which obviously they would be! Actually, temporary stands would not be safe. A temporary stand would not be allowed to be built above the north end of the east terrace as it would interfere with the turnstiles and the food outlets. As there is always a big queue for people getting food and drink, how would people queue if there is temporary seating in the way? And for the away terrace, there will be nowhere to put new toilets and a food outlet if temporary seating was put above.
Also, going back to my comments regarding the UWE project. It is now 4 years since planning permission was approved. 4 YEARS!!!! No other sporting venue has had to wait so long for the stadium to begin building. 4 YEARS! And we are now just weeks away from 2017. Surely this cant go into a 5th Year? WE NEED ACTION - NOW!!!!
I can see what you are saying about 4 years however don't forget the stadium funding etc, was as watertight as the titanic In view of that no one is going to splash cash willy nilly ,not until everything relating to it is gone over with a fine tooth comb, or simply put knowing the bits we know would you just start building not knowing if something in the paperwork would bite you in the ass in future
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2016 11:57:45 GMT
Don't Bath RFC get away with using temporary stands?
|
|
|
Post by casey12a on Nov 2, 2016 12:28:47 GMT
There are plenty of temporary stands at sporting venues. We have two already, so of course we would be allowed two more, if they were safe, which obviously they would be! Actually, temporary stands would not be safe. A temporary stand would not be allowed to be built above the north end of the east terrace as it would interfere with the turnstiles and the food outlets. As there is always a big queue for people getting food and drink, how would people queue if there is temporary seating in the way? And for the away terrace, there will be nowhere to put new toilets and a food outlet if temporary seating was put above.
Also, going back to my comments regarding the UWE project. It is now 4 years since planning permission was approved. 4 YEARS!!!! No other sporting venue has had to wait so long for the stadium to begin building. 4 YEARS! And we are now just weeks away from 2017. Surely this cant go into a 5th Year? WE NEED ACTION - NOW!!!!
Wael mentioned in his interview with the Guardian that dealing with UWE isn't like dealing with a private company where a CEO makes all of the decisions. Everything has to go to a committee which takes time. I believe this is why it's taking so long. However, we haven't got any other choice at the moment because if it's not UWE we'd have to start all over again.
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Nov 2, 2016 12:43:04 GMT
I think if we get promoted again for a 3rd time, the UWE will get built very quickly with extra money thrown at it to ensure that
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2016 12:44:11 GMT
I think if we get promoted again for a 3rd time, the UWE will get built very quickly with extra money thrown at it to ensure that What's with the "if"? We don't need negativity like that !
|
|
|
Post by Henbury Gas on Nov 2, 2016 12:45:49 GMT
I think if we get promoted again for a 3rd time, the UWE will get built very quickly with extra money thrown at it to ensure that What's with the "if"? We don't need negativity like that ! ok ok .... AFTER
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2016 12:46:52 GMT
What's with the "if"? We don't need negativity like that ! ok ok .... AFTERThat's better.
|
|