|
|
Post by Gas_Quarters on Oct 17, 2018 18:25:07 GMT
Bonham
Partington
J.Clarke
Craig
Kelly
Matthews
Lines
Sercombe
Bennett
Payne
Jakubiak
|
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 17, 2018 18:38:17 GMT
What I'd love to see: -----------------Bonham-------- Partington--Lockyer--Broadbent--Kelly -Matthews --Sercombe--Clarke--Bennett- ------------Jakubiak--Payne----------- That pretty much what weve been doing all season , right footer on left and left footer on right No attacking fullbacks .. Zero width , narrow predictable football. |
|
|
|
Post by dickiedamsell on Oct 17, 2018 18:39:45 GMT
Bonham, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols and Nichols upfront.
|
|
|
|
Post by legas on Oct 17, 2018 18:41:08 GMT
Bonham, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols and Nichols upfront. is that with Bohnam as the lone striker? |
|
|
|
Post by dickiedamsell on Oct 17, 2018 18:45:02 GMT
Be more effective if it was Bonham as lone striker as the others in my selection will never score, not on the pitch anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 17, 2018 19:06:20 GMT
Bonham, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols, Nichols and Nichols upfront. Your usual insightful input . Nichols in every position and sack the board 🛎end |
|
|
|
Post by richard on Oct 17, 2018 19:38:46 GMT
Bonham
Parts
Lockyer
Craig
Kelly
Upson
Lines
Rodman
Nichols
Matthews
Jakubiak
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2018 19:46:37 GMT
Astounded how many have left Lockyer out of their preferred side.
As Ollie is suspended (if he wasn't, he'd be in for Sincs)...
Bonham
Partington Lockyer Craig Kelly
Lines Sinclair
Matthews Sercombe Bennett
Jakubiak
Subs: Smith, J Clarke, Broadbent, Martin, Rodman, Reilly, Payne
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2018 19:47:53 GMT
A few options come to mind.... 442: --------------Bonham---------- Leads/Parts---JC---TC---Kelly Matthews--Sincs--Sercs--Bennett -----------Jak----Payne-------- 3521: --------------Bonham----------- ----------JC-----TL----TC------- Leads----Upson--Sincs--Lines---Kelly -----------Matthews---Sercs------- ---------------Jak---------------- 433: --------------Bonham---------- Leads/Parts---JC---TC---Kelly -----Sercs--Sincs--Rodman-------- ----Matthews---Jak---Bennett------- Not sure we'd get away with a 3-5-2-1 but given the standard of referreeibg this season, it's unlikely they can count to 11 so well worth a try! |
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 17, 2018 19:49:40 GMT
Bonham Parts Lockyer Craig Kelly Upson Lines Rodman Nichols Matthews Jakubiak Wouldn’t mind seeing Nichols as the number10 he doesn’t score but is tidy on the ball, although I’d rather see sercombe there ( yes i know he was poor v Burton but most were ) Would you have Rodman and Mathews left or right ? |
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 17, 2018 19:58:46 GMT
Also it means no Olly Clarke who been probably our best midfielder this sesson.
Having said that I think his type of game suits the dreadful narrow football we’ve been playing more than lines game who I personally think is one of the best playmakers in this division when we look to get it out wide.
I wouldn’t be surprised if lines handed in a transfer request in January.
He got so much more to offer at this level but not with this current team with these narrow current tactics.
|
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 17, 2018 20:17:21 GMT
Attack! Attack! Attack! 4-3-3 to stop the attacking players dropping too deep and just making a 5 man midfield. GK Bonham LB Kelly CB Craig CB J Clarke RB Partington DCM O Clarke Edit: Upson CM Lines CM Sercombe ST Reilly ST Jakubiak ST Rodman Then go more defensive once we're 5-0 up... Playing narrow has got us no where this season but at least in this tactic it’s obviously narrow , I’d rather that than play Rodman left and Mathews right to be honest because that’s got us no where all season and this way at least we’ve got three strikers up front . Waste of time playing lines though so narrow better off going Sinclair upson and Clarke midfield and just bypas them in possession and rely on them defensive and blast sh**ty long balls over the top in the hope that someone can get on the end of them.( which is pretty much what we’ve been doing this last year ) In other words do basically what what we’ve been doing this season but with a formation that’s more suited to it. Ps do this and expect to lose our only playmaker in January and also expect our chairman to say “ I told you , the old Wimbledon spirit “ |
|
|
|
Post by bluestone on Oct 17, 2018 20:42:50 GMT
A few options come to mind.... 442: --------------Bonham---------- Leads/Parts---JC---TC---Kelly Matthews--Sincs--Sercs--Bennett -----------Jak----Payne-------- 3521: --------------Bonham----------- ----------JC-----TL----TC------- Leads----Upson--Sincs--Lines---Kelly -----------Matthews---Sercs------- ---------------Jak---------------- 433: --------------Bonham---------- Leads/Parts---JC---TC---Kelly -----Sercs--Sincs--Rodman-------- ----Matthews---Jak---Bennett------- Not sure we'd get away with a 3-5-2-1 but given the standard of referreeibg this season, it's unlikely they can count to 11 so well worth a try! Oops! You caught me out there. Perhaps Matthews would not be noticed as he's quite dinky isn't he? |
|
|
|
Post by aghast on Oct 17, 2018 21:35:03 GMT
I love how all these pundits on here shuffle around the same bunch of players and think that suddenly some magic will emerge from their choice.
It's not about tactics and formations. It really isn't.
It's all about ability, motivation, and confidence.
|
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 17, 2018 22:03:25 GMT
I love how all these pundits on here shuffle around the same bunch of players and think that suddenly some magic will emerge from their choice. It's not about tactics and formations. It really isn't. It's all about ability, motivation, and confidence. It is abiout tactics if you play all your right footers on the left and all your left footers on the right with no overlapping fullbacks. It’s actually the easiest system to play against. I don’t know if you’ve ever played football but I’ve been playing it all my life and still am and all defenders want and all a goalkeeper want is too keep the fullbacks tucked in close to the the Center half’s and the opposition to play in to their hands. It’s water easy too defend against and that’s what our tactics have been this season. |
|
|
|
Post by stevek192 on Oct 17, 2018 22:10:45 GMT
OLLIE CLARKE IS SUSPENDED!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 17, 2018 22:43:44 GMT
OLLIE CLARKE IS SUSPENDED!!!! No need to shout. Then play partington alongside lines in. 4-2-3–1. A solid defensive player alongside a playmaker who can also run from deep. Number 10 sercombe Left side Mathews Right side Rodman whip in low hard crosses Jak up front running on to them. Sinclair to come on last 20 and run them in to the ground but we’d be winning by then anyway because it’s style that works with Chris lines spreading the play. |
|
|
|
Post by Wimborne Gas on Oct 17, 2018 23:21:10 GMT
Attack! Attack! Attack! 4-3-3 to stop the attacking players dropping too deep and just making a 5 man midfield. GK Bonham LB Kelly CB Craig CB J Clarke RB Partington DCM O Clarke Edit: Upson CM Lines CM Sercombe ST Reilly ST Jakubiak ST Rodman Then go more defensive once we're 5-0 up... Playing narrow has got us no where this season but at least in this tactic it’s obviously narrow , I’d rather that than play Rodman left and Mathews right to be honest because that’s got us no where all season and this way at least we’ve got three strikers up front . Waste of time playing lines though so narrow better off going Sinclair upson and Clarke midfield and just bypas them in possession and rely on them defensive and blast sh**ty long balls over the top in the hope that someone can get on the end of them.( which is pretty much what we’ve been doing this last year ) In other words do basically what what we’ve been doing this season but with a formation that’s more suited to it. Ps do this and expect to lose our only playmaker in January and also expect our chairman to say “ I told you , the old Wimbledon spirit “ The 2 wide ST should provide constant width running the channels along with FBs as and when they can get forward. Whenever we play 3 behind a ST we usually just end up with 5 across the middle hence the 3 ST to attack and shoot on sight. Lines is in there as he can still pick a pass and drive forward. He also adds a bit of height which we lack. 2 CDMs at home is doing my head in as we just sit too deep with no support to the front man/men. It's all irrelevant anyway. There's no consequences to any of these suggestions so we'll never know what is the best combination. It just proves that fans all have different ideas and DC can't ever please everyone when the teamsheet is announced! |
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 17, 2018 23:52:17 GMT
Playing narrow has got us no where this season but at least in this tactic it’s obviously narrow , I’d rather that than play Rodman left and Mathews right to be honest because that’s got us no where all season and this way at least we’ve got three strikers up front . Waste of time playing lines though so narrow better off going Sinclair upson and Clarke midfield and just bypas them in possession and rely on them defensive and blast sh**ty long balls over the top in the hope that someone can get on the end of them.( which is pretty much what we’ve been doing this last year ) In other words do basically what what we’ve been doing this season but with a formation that’s more suited to it. Ps do this and expect to lose our only playmaker in January and also expect our chairman to say “ I told you , the old Wimbledon spirit “ The 2 wide ST should provide constant width running the channels along with FBs as and when they can get forward. Whenever we play 3 behind a ST we usually just end up with 5 across the middle hence the 3 ST to attack and shoot on sight. Lines is in there as he can still pick a pass and drive forward. He also adds a bit of height which we lack. 2 CDMs at home is doing my head in as we just sit too deep with no support to the front man/men. It's all irrelevant anyway. There's no consequences to any of these suggestions so we'll never know what is the best combination. It just proves that fans all have different ideas and DC can't ever please everyone when the teamsheet is announced! Your right about our opinions not making any difference to what DC chooses come Saturday but I’d rather have these discussions that are about football than get in to a row with midland or talk about some new rumour about a take over. Nothing wrong with giving your opinion on a football forum about football matters rather than throwing insults at each other over hear say and bullshit rumours. I agree if we continue to play so narrow then might as well play the players that suit it but I’d rather we actually played the way that’s got DC success and we know that works than try something new now when let’s face it we’re in big trouble. If I’d had four years of success and then had a year of problems I can sure as hell be certain I’d go back to what worked well for those four years. |
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Oct 18, 2018 7:27:48 GMT
But for 4 years we've always had a decent goal scorer Taylor, Gaffney (on loan), Bodin & Harrison, perhaps after the pre-season hammerings by Exeter & then P'boro DC decided there was more logic in setting us to stop conceding goals rather than scoring goals?
|
|
