|
Post by RD on Apr 3, 2020 12:02:47 GMT
Anuvver intlligunt interventshun beye a moderator. Nowt to say about the running of our club? I've got plenty to say but I'm not telling you * nah, nah, nah, nah, nah * Ooooooh look at me! I'm so f**king important!!!!! Bow down to me you mere "plebs!"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2020 12:02:55 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2020 12:04:38 GMT
people seriously need to give this tweet and the thread it is quoting a read.... mental
|
|
|
Post by teanbiscuits on Apr 3, 2020 12:04:52 GMT
Anuvver intlligunt interventshun beye a moderator. Nowt to say about the running of our club? When you pick out other peoples intelligence it's fair game to get it back.
|
|
|
Post by gregsy on Apr 3, 2020 12:05:11 GMT
Rovers cluedo again..... This one might be guessable though....
|
|
|
Post by blueridge on Apr 3, 2020 12:07:04 GMT
This is I'm sure a very naïve question but its prompted by the seemingly huge (relatively speaking) year on year spend that we're incurring and the absence this year of a detailed breakdown of the spend through the last set of accounts - bearing in mind our spend on salaries is capped. Are the owners 'trading' the interest that's being taken on their investment - ie taking the interest? Rightly or wrongly I still see BRFC 1983 as an investment for the family which was denied early in their tenure - but someone is putting money into the club and getting a return through interest charged (6% pa?). Personally I don't have the faintest idea how this works but could someone enlighten please.
|
|
|
Post by jungleboogie on Apr 3, 2020 12:08:35 GMT
Gasincider, can I ask why you continue to spout your 'ITK' nonsense on social media platforms, yet when you're asked to back it up, and go on Gascast to let everyone know what you are allegedly privy to, you run for the hills, and chicken out? Bit like here really, someone asks you to back up your claims, but you just disappear for a week or two, and hope that everyone's forgotten by the time you come back. Let me think. Shall I name people that have no faith in the owner um................... No. Gascast? Ha, ha, what a twat. Changed your reply completely now. You know what Gascast is, you were talking out of your arse on Twitter, and then shat yourself when you got called out to back up your comments, after being invited to take part in the podcast, or are you now denying that happened???
|
|
|
Post by althepirate on Apr 3, 2020 12:09:02 GMT
Anuvver intlligunt interventshun beye a moderator. Nowt to say about the running of our club? Is this how you and KM talk to the owners? People are making judgements on this thread, you need to be a little wiser.
|
|
|
Post by RD on Apr 3, 2020 12:12:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by RD on Apr 3, 2020 12:13:17 GMT
Astonishing. KM exposed. SH exposed.
A number of us already heard bits and pieces but I think this confirms the disgusting and dirty games they've been playing to try and discredit the Board.
Good riddance to KM. You sir are an absolute disgrace!! Do us all a favour and stop coming to Mem. You don't care about the club, you've only ever cared about your own agenda.
|
|
|
Post by RD on Apr 3, 2020 12:16:08 GMT
Let's be honest GI. You are one of either of the following:
1) Another of KMs/SHs little cronies. Just helping them out on their dirty little campaign to discredit the board 2) A fool who has mistakenly been taken in by their BS
Either way, it's probably worth backing off a bit now. You're looking like a complete fool.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2020 12:25:48 GMT
I realise you won't want to name names but can you tell us any more about the two people involved ? The prospect of having some leading Bristol businessmen on-board would have given a glimmer of hope because we badly need some new vitality and fresh ideas and if they are Gasheads then all the better. But how would they have been investing in the club ? By acquiring shares from Dwane Sports in order to provide some financial return for Wael's brothers ? Through a share issue putting new cash into the club, perhaps to finance the player development plan, funding a training ground and extra coaching support for the manager ? Or would they have been more like the potential Fruit Market Developers and been brought in to facilitate a new stadium ? I notice someone on here has suggested the two directors are leading Bristol businessmen. No they aren't. That would give the impression of them being white knights riding over the hill to save us. They are both out and out Rovers fans who are desperate to see the club heading in the right direction, and who had ideas for a stadium site to secure our future. Someone asked 'would they have been more like Fruit Market Developers who had been brought in to facilitate a new stadium'. The answer to that is yes. I think the question you need need to ask is why they were appointed to the board, and then the following day they weren't. Can we seriously think the person at the helm knows what he is doing when this sort of thing happens? It doesn't matter what I may know or may not as opposed to all you 'plebs'. That is pathetic. Some people are worried about stating what they know. As far as I am concerned, if things carry on as they are we won't have a club to support. So stop the hand wringing, and wake up before it's too late. Bristol Live first used the term "leading".
|
|
|
Post by baggins on Apr 3, 2020 12:28:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Apr 3, 2020 12:30:35 GMT
How do you try and discredit our board anymore than they are doing themselves? £20m+ in debt and a ground which needs bulldozing and a team which has won 1 since January?
Our problem as fans sat at home you can't work out which group to support, I'm not sure backing Wael as he takes us to financial oblivion, makes any more sense than backing KM & co.
|
|
|
Post by gregsy on Apr 3, 2020 12:30:58 GMT
I suppose one piece of good news is that with all of this potentially libellous stuff doing the rounds is the mem ain't too far from HMP Bristol....
|
|
|
Post by althepirate on Apr 3, 2020 12:32:53 GMT
Bristol Live should be fun tomorrow
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Apr 3, 2020 12:45:04 GMT
Stop.
Hamer time.
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Apr 3, 2020 12:56:06 GMT
Christ! What a complete ****fest all this is. I don’t /won’t comment on it because I know sod all and certainly none of the characters involved. All I do is support and love BRFC and have done for 50+ years and reading this is staggering. And these people, both sides, profess to be working in the interests of us! Whatever they are arguing over is a bit beside the point when we’re £24m in debt. Both sides come over as completely disfunctional including our owners who’ve accrued the debt. Too many people, too much time when nothing else is happening. Jeez! UTG! Whilst there is still a gas to support.
|
|
|
Post by Topper Gas on Apr 3, 2020 12:58:43 GMT
This is I'm sure a very naïve question but its prompted by the seemingly huge (relatively speaking) year on year spend that we're incurring and the absence this year of a detailed breakdown of the spend through the last set of accounts - bearing in mind our spend on salaries is capped. Are the owners 'trading' the interest that's being taken on their investment - ie taking the interest? Rightly or wrongly I still see BRFC 1983 as an investment for the family which was denied early in their tenure - but someone is putting money into the club and getting a return through interest charged (6% pa?). Personally I don't have the faintest idea how this works but could someone enlighten please. Surely it's just a paper loss i.e. appearing on the accounts but not being taken by the owners? I asked Knowall to answer that question earlier this week but as ever he ignored the question, perhaps one of the ITK'ers could answer that question?
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Apr 3, 2020 13:04:39 GMT
This is I'm sure a very naïve question but its prompted by the seemingly huge (relatively speaking) year on year spend that we're incurring and the absence this year of a detailed breakdown of the spend through the last set of accounts - bearing in mind our spend on salaries is capped. Are the owners 'trading' the interest that's being taken on their investment - ie taking the interest? Rightly or wrongly I still see BRFC 1983 as an investment for the family which was denied early in their tenure - but someone is putting money into the club and getting a return through interest charged (6% pa?). Personally I don't have the faintest idea how this works but could someone enlighten please. Surely it's just a paper loss i.e. appearing on the accounts but not being taken by the owners? I asked Knowall to answer that question earlier this week but as ever he ignored the question, perhaps one of the ITK'ers could answer that question? If we are talking about the interest payable, than it is a liability on the balance sheet. No money will have been taken. It's accruing and will either be paid or written of if and when the club is sold, or if the current owners decided to write it off.
|
|