|
Post by francegas on Jun 8, 2020 18:22:00 GMT
Good to see the protesters in South Africa are able to behave themselves and not pull down any statues of presidents who ran the country during apartheid. Whereas in Bristol a baying mob pull down a statue of a man who lived 300 years ago.
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Jun 8, 2020 18:30:12 GMT
Anyone listening to the counter narrative being spewed out by the Government? Standard fare. Anyone who challenges authority is a thug. Citing violence that actually hardly happened. Goodness me. Count me in, I must be a thug. Yep I am take it all with a pinch of salt,most Home Secretary's will stand up for law and oder and the Police,goes with the job title. Tbf there was a small minority who for what ever reason decided to lob stuff at the Police up until then it was all pretty peaceful
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Jun 8, 2020 18:34:48 GMT
Marvin's take on the BBC news was interesting..... Saying that politicians and the media are collectively responsible.... Go Marv, didn't think you had it in you.... Sorry missed it responsible for what?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2020 18:36:19 GMT
Good to see the protesters in South Africa are able to behave themselves and not pull down any statues of presidents who ran the country during apartheid. Whereas in Bristol a baying mob pull down a statue of a man who lived 300 years ago. Great. Good for them actually, great discipline to not allow reactionaries to deflect from the point of the protest. But of course, having lost thousands to the murderous Apartheid regime and achieved their objectives of getting that regime confined to history they just might feel the political battle there is won.
|
|
|
Post by gregsy on Jun 8, 2020 18:42:29 GMT
Marvin's take on the BBC news was interesting..... Saying that politicians and the media are collectively responsible.... Go Marv, didn't think you had it in you.... Sorry missed it responsible for what? It'll be available on iPlayer, but Rees basically tore into local media for not ever wanting debates on the issue.... It was creepy how the BBC points west presented though, not impartial in the slightest.... It was like coverage of a victory.... Not sure the BBC should be quite so cute....
|
|
|
Post by trevorgas on Jun 8, 2020 19:02:58 GMT
Sorry missed it responsible for what? It'll be available on iPlayer, but Rees basically tore into local media for not ever wanting debates on the issue.... It was creepy how the BBC points west presented though, not impartial in the slightest.... It was like coverage of a victory.... Not sure the BBC should be quite so cute.... Thanks will have a look. Don't start me on the dear old Beeb losing their impartiality is dangerous for a public services broadcaster.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2020 19:20:16 GMT
It'll be available on iPlayer, but Rees basically tore into local media for not ever wanting debates on the issue.... It was creepy how the BBC points west presented though, not impartial in the slightest.... It was like coverage of a victory.... Not sure the BBC should be quite so cute.... Thanks will have a look. Don't start me on the dear old Beeb losing their impartiality is dangerous for a public services broadcaster. The only way they could appeal to their target audience more is if they renamed themselves to “The British Social Justice Corporation”
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Jun 8, 2020 19:24:01 GMT
Anyone listening to the counter narrative being spewed out by the Government? Standard fare. Anyone who challenges authority is a thug. Citing violence that actually hardly happened. Goodness me. Count me in, I must be a thug. They've lost control of the country, Oldie. They did ever since they backed Cummings over the millions.
|
|
|
Post by Hugo the Elder on Jun 8, 2020 19:30:27 GMT
Anyone listening to the counter narrative being spewed out by the Government? Standard fare. Anyone who challenges authority is a thug. Citing violence that actually hardly happened. Goodness me. Count me in, I must be a thug. They've lost control of the country, Oldie. They did ever since they backed Cummings over the millions. Bozo sacking Cummings would be like Emu sacking Rod Hull.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2020 19:40:53 GMT
Anyone listening to the counter narrative being spewed out by the Government? Standard fare. Anyone who challenges authority is a thug. Citing violence that actually hardly happened. Goodness me. Count me in, I must be a thug. They've lost control of the country, Oldie. They did ever since they backed Cummings over the millions. It will be interesting to see their approval ratings right now
|
|
|
Post by matealotblue on Jun 8, 2020 19:56:18 GMT
They've lost control of the country, Oldie. They did ever since they backed Cummings over the millions. It will be interesting to see their approval ratings right now I suspect they don’t give a flying fig about their approval ratings at the moment with over 4 years to the next election. Most Governments take a hit with that after election and dip down. The trick for any Government (not that I have any background to comment from a position of authority on the subject I should point out 🙄) is to bring it up, by whatever means, in the 12 to 18 months prior to an election.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2020 20:09:42 GMT
It will be interesting to see their approval ratings right now I suspect they don’t give a flying fig about their approval ratings at the moment with over 4 years to the next election. Most Governments take a hit with that after election and dip down. The trick for any Government (not that I have any background to comment from a position of authority on the subject I should point out 🙄) is to bring it up, by whatever means, in the 12 to 18 months prior to an election. I don’t care what they think, I want to see how the last few weeks has affected things- the outrage about Cummings was reflected in the polls. Gassy has talked of “the millions” being offended. Where do the protests fit into the picture? I rather suspect there is not much overlap between the protesters and the Tory voters in the last election. We know that the country overwhelmingly voted Tory, so it could be argued there is a silent majority out there- where do they stand currently following Cummings-gate and the protests?
|
|
|
Post by stuart1974 on Jun 8, 2020 20:13:11 GMT
They've lost control of the country, Oldie. They did ever since they backed Cummings over the millions. It will be interesting to see their approval ratings right now Any election is about a year away and 4 years or so for a GE, but for the record yesterday's poll was: Covid-19 47% disapprove of way Tories dealt with crisis (up 4 points) 34% approve (down 3 points) 57% think govt is bringing UK out of lockdown too fast 56% expect lockdown measures to have to be reimposed 36% confidence in govt ability to handle situation vs. 44% don’t Johnson ratings drop 44% disapprove of way Johnson acting as PM (up 2 points). 37% approve Starmer’s rating same at 45% approve, 17% disapprove Cummings: 71% think he should be sacked (68% last wk). 66% think because of his actions public more likely to break rules (from 58%)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2020 20:13:46 GMT
I suspect they don’t give a flying fig about their approval ratings at the moment with over 4 years to the next election. Most Governments take a hit with that after election and dip down. The trick for any Government (not that I have any background to comment from a position of authority on the subject I should point out 🙄) is to bring it up, by whatever means, in the 12 to 18 months prior to an election. I don’t care what they think, I want to see how the last few weeks has affected things- the outrage about Cummings was reflected in the polls. Gassy has talked of “the millions” being offended. Where do the protests fit into the picture? I rather suspect there is not much overlap between the protesters and the Tory voters in the last election. We know that the country overwhelmingly voted Tory, so it could be argued there is a silent majority out there- where do they stand currently following Cummings-gate and the protests? Last week's polling suggested that Johnson has slipped more than 15 points in approval ratings. If he gets another pasting at PMQs on Wednesday his own ranks may well start to mutter.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2020 20:19:41 GMT
I don’t care what they think, I want to see how the last few weeks has affected things- the outrage about Cummings was reflected in the polls. Gassy has talked of “the millions” being offended. Where do the protests fit into the picture? I rather suspect there is not much overlap between the protesters and the Tory voters in the last election. We know that the country overwhelmingly voted Tory, so it could be argued there is a silent majority out there- where do they stand currently following Cummings-gate and the protests? Last week's polling suggested that Johnson has slipped more than 15 points in approval ratings. If he gets another pasting at PMQs on Wednesday his own ranks may well start to mutter. What fortuitous timing then to have a race relations issue blow up....
|
|
|
Post by warehamgas on Jun 8, 2020 20:39:28 GMT
Late to this thread but fwiw: Two issues have become intertwined in Bristol yesterday. One the George Floyd protests which are important and people have every right to protest peacefully and secondly some very local feelings about Edward Colston and the history of Bristol. It looks like some of the latter protesters saw yesterday’s legitimate protests as an opportunity to do what they wanted, that is get rid of the statue. They were able to do that under the cover of the black lives matter protests. From reading and listening to what people have said it appears that the statue’s future and a change to the plaque underneath it and the renaming of many other “Colston” buildings have been on the agenda for some time and for whatever reasons it hasn’t happened. So the locals saw an opportunity and decided to take it into their own hands and use direct action to achieve what they wanted.
From this whole incident I would draw some pretty clear conclusions: 1. Politicians, local and national need to listen to what people are saying. A Tory party can’t just deliver what their “supporters” want nor should the Labour Party think they will ever get elected on the manifesto that was presented to us in December. Locally, politicians need to move far quicker to deliver what they can deliver. It seems that they had opportunities to change the wording on the plaque and decide upon its future but haven’t been able to close it out. I bet they all regret it now. Had they acted, they would also have been able to turn it into a learning experience of making it clear why they have acted, satisfied their community and ensured the legacy of Colston could perhaps have been turned into a far more positive thing for the people of Bristol. Instead they look to have procrastinated so that now Bristol’s reputation has suffered and some local people will feel great resentment at what protesters and thugs have done. The more extreme locals did it for them! No one wins.
2. When legitimate concerns, even if held by a minority of the people, are ignored some people / protesters will decide upon direct action because they have no trust or belief that their legitimate concerns are being listened to. Leave that situation too long for years and years and people will take direct action through frustration. This hasn’t just happened in America. It’s been happening for years with violent police and their actions against many people, in this case, George Floyd. 20 years ago it was Rodney King, it has been happening for too long and now a new generation is trying to do something about it. Mix that with a President who wants to show how strong he is, who has no grasp on history or how to take the heat out of a situation and you get what you’ve just seen. When genuine concerns are not dealt with then a small minority of activists often step into the situation and seek a redress very directly. It happened in Peterloo, Manchester in 1819, all over the USA in the 60s over segregation in schools, Chicago in 1968, Toxteth and Brixton Riots in 1981, Sharpeville in 1960 in South Africa. Governments need to act before it gets to that point.
3. This country has always largely been policed by consent. The vast majority of people are happy to be policed and accept the police’s action by and large. But over the last 10 years the police have lost a lot of respect and in some areas are rarely seen. Clearly yesterday the police made a strategic decision not to act against the vandals and whilst I might disagree with that I can’t say I blame them because they were hopelessly outnumbered. How has that been allowed to happen? Over the past few months the lack of investment, recruitment in essential services have been made very clear. I think Governments needs to reverse that. Anecdotally, talking, from a social distance obviously, to a neighbour today he said that yesterday there were less than 20 policemen in Dorset yesterday because they had all gone to cover demonstrations elsewhere. So less than 20 officers in Dorset to do police stuff, quite frightening if true.
Sure that many people will disagree but not only the actions but also the causes behind actions need to be considered.
UTG!
|
|
|
Post by stuartcampbell on Jun 8, 2020 23:03:09 GMT
Out of interest I would like to ask a question.
In recent times, a public hatred towards Winston Churchill, largely from the younger population has arisen. A common way to put this down is "you would be speaking German if it wasn't for Churchill!" This is used as an attempt to fully delegitimise huge, valid criticisms of Churchill. However, Joseph Stalin is commonly thought of as a "crazed communist who was against free speech and killed tens of millions." But is the exact same not true for him? I think it's safe to say that Stalin had more of an impact on the overall outcome of the war than Churchill. So my point is thus, why is one idolised and criticism of him is suppressed, and the other is tarnished? The actions of both resulted in the deaths of millions, both held abhorrent views towards certain ethnic minorities. Should both not be seen in the same spotlight? Whatever that is.
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 19,440
|
Post by pirate on Jun 8, 2020 23:18:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Gassy on Jun 9, 2020 6:37:43 GMT
Out of interest I would like to ask a question. In recent times, a public hatred towards Winston Churchill, largely from the younger population has arisen. A common way to put this down is "you would be speaking German if it wasn't for Churchill!" This is used as an attempt to fully delegitimise huge, valid criticisms of Churchill. However, Joseph Stalin is commonly thought of as a "crazed communist who was against free speech and killed tens of millions." But is the exact same not true for him? I think it's safe to say that Stalin had more of an impact on the overall outcome of the war than Churchill. So my point is thus, why is one idolised and criticism of him is suppressed, and the other is tarnished? The actions of both resulted in the deaths of millions, both held abhorrent views towards certain ethnic minorities. Should both not be seen in the same spotlight? Whatever that is. Wasn’t Churchill voted the best ever Brit? I think it’s down to a few things 1. Lack of education. I certainly wasn’t taught in school how much the Russians did for WWII. Since childhood I was taught are brought up with “Britain won the war” 2. “Commies” are evil 3. We idolize the war. To that note, I think we even idolize ourselves that we still have this plucky British togetherness to do what must be done for our country - which lockdown has proven has long gone out of our culture (long before the killing of George Floyd)
|
|
|
Post by peterparker on Jun 9, 2020 6:38:35 GMT
Out of interest I would like to ask a question. In recent times, a public hatred towards Winston Churchill, largely from the younger population has arisen. A common way to put this down is "you would be speaking German if it wasn't for Churchill!" This is used as an attempt to fully delegitimise huge, valid criticisms of Churchill. However, Joseph Stalin is commonly thought of as a "crazed communist who was against free speech and killed tens of millions." But is the exact same not true for him? I think it's safe to say that Stalin had more of an impact on the overall outcome of the war than Churchill. So my point is thus, why is one idolised and criticism of him is suppressed, and the other is tarnished? The actions of both resulted in the deaths of millions, both held abhorrent views towards certain ethnic minorities. Should both not be seen in the same spotlight? Whatever that is. I will answer a question with a question if I may Should be ever erect a statue of anybody ever again? Is it even possible If an authorirty want to wack up a statue of somebody now or try to, no doubt some will dig up offensive tweets or something on other social media recorded having abused someone in street or something
|
|