Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2020 12:33:02 GMT
I presumed that throw away remark was in jest. At this point I don't understand why anyone is trying to unpick a campaign that seeks to highlight and hopefully drive action to change prejudicial attitudes and /or outright racism. Of course, you assumed it was in jest. Have you ever wondered where brown people see themselves fitting into all this? And telling people that expressing the opinion that ALL lives matter is somehow unacceptable, won`t help change prejudicial attitudes. Never. And that’s exactly why BLM is a crap slogan. “Hey everyone, let’s take the oppressed and sub-divide them into an even smaller group than they were before and play “Oppression Olympics” to see who gets on the mic first....oh it’s black people! Sorry Asians and hispanics, you’ll get your turn....maybe!” Call it “end racism now”...unless I’m missing the point and it really *is* all about black people and they are trying to segregate themselves from other racial minorities on purpose?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2020 12:34:58 GMT
365 - Can you link me where the twitter account said they wanted to end capitalism? I just had a look through their twitter and I didn't find it. All I can see if I google it is a Daily Mail & Torygraph article on it. I find it interesting that since the papers reported on it, the aims of BLM seems to be known - but before that, you had no idea? Screams to me that until this article came out, no one knew or bothered to look. Am I wrong? Having looked through the twitter account I saw 2 mentions of state brutality in 2 weeks. The rest of it was about ending racism in the UK and expressing discontent about racist things happening across the country, so I don't think it's quite as bad as you're making out. My general opinion of the police is exceptionally high in the UK. My first thoughts of police brutality against anyone, never mind BAME would naturally be that I don't believe it's there, however, I generally wouldn't like to say to someone that there isn't racist police brutality, if I don't have any idea. Just had a very quick google and the number of deaths in custody is exceptionally low (f*ck you America) and from BAME whilst it is out of proportion, 10 people more is such a small sample size that to discuss death in police custody against BAME being racist wouldn't be a fair argument IMO. So I'm potentially on side. However, statistics that are also worth noting - Black people are 8x more likely to be stopped & searched - Metropolitan police are 4x more likely to use force on black people - Black people were twice as likely to be fined for breaking lockdown There are a few reports of police racism, I saw one from someone quite senior in the force recently admitting that there was still racism and it was still very prevalent. So ultimately, what do you want to put brutality down to? Deaths? Or violence? The stats show that yeah, there is police brutality against black people. www.gofundme.com/f/ukblm-fund “We’re guided by a commitment to dismantle imperialism, capitalism...” Careful what you wish for I guess... Interestingly they had that Mission statement on their twitter in a 4 panel jpg, it appears to have been removed but it is obviously still on their funding page. I can assure you most strongly that I wasn’t made aware of it through the daily mail either! More a forum that has a spectrum of political opinions- from left to right. And whilst this is not a game or a point scoring exercise I will gently say it is “good to see” that your reasoning agrees with mine that the number of deaths is low. When people parrot the stats (and sc was guilty of this earlier) relating to the U.K. they never put it in context, number of deaths vs arrests. When you do that, as you saw yourself, complaining about deaths of anyone regardless of skin colour in the U.K. is such a miniscule sample size that it’s pointless. Oldie thinks squabbling over the minutiae like this is pointless but it actually isn’t because the semantics are important. Otherwise you fall into BLMs emotive trap of thinking *everything* in the U.K. is sh** (which is what they want you to believe) when actually some things are not as bad as they are making out. I try to keep an open mind so for me, yes, it’s important to separate racism from brutality from deaths in custody. And I guess it depends what the definition of brutality actually is- to me it implies physical harm so police stopping more black people is not brutality, that’s *potentially* racism but what I don’t have is evidence for or against the notion that black people are identified as the suspect for more crimes. If that *were* to be the case then the police have more reason to seek out black people than they would other races, right? You still mention black on black crime. Can't you ask yourself why there is more black on black crime? Does there skin colour make them do more crimes? What could possibly have happened in black history to have created a situation where there is more black on black crime? What traumatic event displaced millions of people, destroyed their culture and forced them to attempt to fit in with white culture, but never be truly welcome within that culture. What could be causing the situation where black on black crime is not being addressed correctly? Most black people are treated as second class citizens by white ideology, so that's what BLM are asking to be discussed. People mention Pakistani and Indian, these races weren't displaced in the same way as Africans, they are mostly economic migrants who bought there culture with them and adhere still adhere to it. Black culture has had to rebuild from being destroyed in recent history, but is having to do so whilst being oppressed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2020 12:47:02 GMT
www.gofundme.com/f/ukblm-fund “We’re guided by a commitment to dismantle imperialism, capitalism...” Careful what you wish for I guess... Interestingly they had that Mission statement on their twitter in a 4 panel jpg, it appears to have been removed but it is obviously still on their funding page. I can assure you most strongly that I wasn’t made aware of it through the daily mail either! More a forum that has a spectrum of political opinions- from left to right. And whilst this is not a game or a point scoring exercise I will gently say it is “good to see” that your reasoning agrees with mine that the number of deaths is low. When people parrot the stats (and sc was guilty of this earlier) relating to the U.K. they never put it in context, number of deaths vs arrests. When you do that, as you saw yourself, complaining about deaths of anyone regardless of skin colour in the U.K. is such a miniscule sample size that it’s pointless. Oldie thinks squabbling over the minutiae like this is pointless but it actually isn’t because the semantics are important. Otherwise you fall into BLMs emotive trap of thinking *everything* in the U.K. is sh** (which is what they want you to believe) when actually some things are not as bad as they are making out. I try to keep an open mind so for me, yes, it’s important to separate racism from brutality from deaths in custody. And I guess it depends what the definition of brutality actually is- to me it implies physical harm so police stopping more black people is not brutality, that’s *potentially* racism but what I don’t have is evidence for or against the notion that black people are identified as the suspect for more crimes. If that *were* to be the case then the police have more reason to seek out black people than they would other races, right? You still mention black on black crime. Can't you ask yourself why there is more black on black crime? Does there skin colour make them do more crimes? What could possibly have happened in black history to have created a situation where there is more black on black crime? What traumatic event displaced millions of people, destroyed their culture and forced them to attempt to fit in with white culture, but never be truly welcome within that culture. What could be causing the situation where black on black crime is not being addressed correctly? Most black people are treated as second class citizens by white ideology, so that's what BLM are asking to be discussed. People mention Pakistani and Indian, these races weren't displaced in the same way as Africans, they are mostly economic migrants who bought there culture with them and adhere still adhere to it. Black culture has had to rebuild from being destroyed in recent history, but is having to do so whilst being oppressed. I'm not trying to be argumentative here, but it's not always helpful to see these issues through prisms of colour. If you have the time, invest 10 minutes listening to this guy, the reference to Glasgow and when he says that a knife crime where the knife is in a black hand suddenly becomes a black crime are key points for me, anyway, watch and let me know what you think;
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2020 12:52:44 GMT
You'll have to forgive me butting in here, but in 1968 I was 7, so couldn't get past the door staff at The Dug Out, no matter how jaunty an angle I wore my beret at, so my question is, was there a time when it wasn't realised that Red Army Faction were in fact a murderous terrorist organisation? I get the student Citizen Smith thing, but surely with the benefit of hindsight we can filter out praise for a group with so much blood on their hands? No I think in the early 70s everybody knew that they were basically a terrorist organisation. Especially those of us who were more drawn to Dr Timothy Leary et al. But then at the same time how do we remember Pres Nixon whose national guard shot dead 4 students at Kent State Uni in Ohio.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2020 12:58:01 GMT
You still mention black on black crime. Can't you ask yourself why there is more black on black crime? Does there skin colour make them do more crimes? What could possibly have happened in black history to have created a situation where there is more black on black crime? What traumatic event displaced millions of people, destroyed their culture and forced them to attempt to fit in with white culture, but never be truly welcome within that culture. What could be causing the situation where black on black crime is not being addressed correctly? Most black people are treated as second class citizens by white ideology, so that's what BLM are asking to be discussed. People mention Pakistani and Indian, these races weren't displaced in the same way as Africans, they are mostly economic migrants who bought there culture with them and adhere still adhere to it. Black culture has had to rebuild from being destroyed in recent history, but is having to do so whilst being oppressed. I'm not trying to be argumentative here, but it's not always helpful to see these issues through prisms of colour. If you have the time, invest 10 minutes listening to this guy, the reference to Glasgow and when he says that a knife crime where the knife is in a black hand suddenly becomes a black crime are key points for me, anyway, watch and let me know what you think; www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/apr/23/knife-offences-hit-record-high-in-2019-in-england-and-wales
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2020 12:59:08 GMT
www.gofundme.com/f/ukblm-fund “We’re guided by a commitment to dismantle imperialism, capitalism...” Careful what you wish for I guess... Interestingly they had that Mission statement on their twitter in a 4 panel jpg, it appears to have been removed but it is obviously still on their funding page. I can assure you most strongly that I wasn’t made aware of it through the daily mail either! More a forum that has a spectrum of political opinions- from left to right. And whilst this is not a game or a point scoring exercise I will gently say it is “good to see” that your reasoning agrees with mine that the number of deaths is low. When people parrot the stats (and sc was guilty of this earlier) relating to the U.K. they never put it in context, number of deaths vs arrests. When you do that, as you saw yourself, complaining about deaths of anyone regardless of skin colour in the U.K. is such a miniscule sample size that it’s pointless. Oldie thinks squabbling over the minutiae like this is pointless but it actually isn’t because the semantics are important. Otherwise you fall into BLMs emotive trap of thinking *everything* in the U.K. is sh** (which is what they want you to believe) when actually some things are not as bad as they are making out. I try to keep an open mind so for me, yes, it’s important to separate racism from brutality from deaths in custody. And I guess it depends what the definition of brutality actually is- to me it implies physical harm so police stopping more black people is not brutality, that’s *potentially* racism but what I don’t have is evidence for or against the notion that black people are identified as the suspect for more crimes. If that *were* to be the case then the police have more reason to seek out black people than they would other races, right? You still mention black on black crime. Can't you ask yourself why there is more black on black crime? Does there skin colour make them do more crimes? What could possibly have happened in black history to have created a situation where there is more black on black crime? What traumatic event displaced millions of people, destroyed their culture and forced them to attempt to fit in with white culture, but never be truly welcome within that culture. What could be causing the situation where black on black crime is not being addressed correctly? Most black people are treated as second class citizens by white ideology, so that's what BLM are asking to be discussed. People mention Pakistani and Indian, these races weren't displaced in the same way as Africans, they are mostly economic migrants who bought there culture with them and adhere still adhere to it. Black culture has had to rebuild from being destroyed in recent history, but is having to do so whilst being oppressed. Look it’s not me who is saying “we’re more at risk of being victims of police” - that’s when skin colour comes into it because that sentence belies the fact that there is a much bigger danger to black people: other black people. And are you saying it’s okay for all poor people to murder just because they are poor? Do they have no agency in deciding whether to kill? Is the state actually holding the gun and pulling the trigger for them?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2020 13:00:55 GMT
You'll have to forgive me butting in here, but in 1968 I was 7, so couldn't get past the door staff at The Dug Out, no matter how jaunty an angle I wore my beret at, so my question is, was there a time when it wasn't realised that Red Army Faction were in fact a murderous terrorist organisation? I get the student Citizen Smith thing, but surely with the benefit of hindsight we can filter out praise for a group with so much blood on their hands? No I think in the early 70s everybody knew that they were basically a terrorist organisation. Especially those of us who were more drawn to Dr Timothy Leary et al. But then at the same time how do we remember Pres Nixon whose national guard shot dead 4 students at Kent State Uni in Ohio. Are we counting bodies to decide who is good and bad? You'll have to set up the rules for this, how much economic growth counts as 1 merit, how many people found innocent after state execution gets you a demerit etc, it sounds like quite a complicated game to me. I was just surprised that you included them in a list of wistful reminiscences. But hey, I make sure that my life size oil painting of Maggie that's hung in pride of place above my bed is dusted and straightened every evening, so we all look over our shoulders towards better days that have past I guess.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2020 13:02:39 GMT
Please watch this young man, he's very interesting and it may broaden out the debate a bit on here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2020 13:09:53 GMT
No I think in the early 70s everybody knew that they were basically a terrorist organisation. Especially those of us who were more drawn to Dr Timothy Leary et al. But then at the same time how do we remember Pres Nixon whose national guard shot dead 4 students at Kent State Uni in Ohio. Are we counting bodies to decide who is good and bad? You'll have to set up the rules for this, how much economic growth counts as 1 merit, how many people found innocent after state execution gets you a demerit etc, it sounds like quite a complicated game to me. I was just surprised that you included them in a list of wistful reminiscences. But hey, I make sure that my life size oil painting of Maggie that's hung in pride of place above my bed is dusted and straightened every evening, so we all look over our shoulders towards better days that have past I guess. That's an image I need to purge from my mind.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2020 13:11:47 GMT
Are we counting bodies to decide who is good and bad? You'll have to set up the rules for this, how much economic growth counts as 1 merit, how many people found innocent after state execution gets you a demerit etc, it sounds like quite a complicated game to me. I was just surprised that you included them in a list of wistful reminiscences. But hey, I make sure that my life size oil painting of Maggie that's hung in pride of place above my bed is dusted and straightened every evening, so we all look over our shoulders towards better days that have past I guess. That's an image I need to purge from my mind. I forgot to mention the naked bit...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2020 13:52:21 GMT
That's an image I need to purge from my mind. I forgot to mention the naked bit... No no no, please.agghhhhhh🏃🏃🏃🏃
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2020 14:49:14 GMT
I forgot to mention the naked bit... No no no, please.agghhhhhh🏃🏃🏃🏃 You didn't even ask if it was me, Maggie or both...
|
|
|
Post by William Wilson on Jun 24, 2020 16:05:46 GMT
Speak for yourself, Les. Many people may have been up for the overthrow of the state, but not "all" were up for the methods employed by the people you mention. I lived and worked in Germany during the heyday of the Baader Meinhof gang. They were not "heady days". Small wonder, you voted for Mr Corbyn. Doubtless he felt the same. We were young, pushing the boundaries. I know in Bristol, from about 1967 on there was a lot of it about. Heady days Gotcha. You can`t stand Boris Johnson, but retain a soft spot for Andreas Baader. Honestly there`s only one other person like you, that`s ever passed through my life in any capacity. Oldie, you are my wife, and I claim my £5.
|
|
|
Post by William Wilson on Jun 24, 2020 16:12:16 GMT
Of course, you assumed it was in jest. Have you ever wondered where brown people see themselves fitting into all this? And telling people that expressing the opinion that ALL lives matter is somehow unacceptable, won`t help change prejudicial attitudes. Never. I am assuming you are taking the water. Which part of what I`ve written above, do you consider, "taking the water."?
|
|
|
Post by William Wilson on Jun 24, 2020 16:43:35 GMT
You still mention black on black crime. Can't you ask yourself why there is more black on black crime? Does there skin colour make them do more crimes? What could possibly have happened in black history to have created a situation where there is more black on black crime? What traumatic event displaced millions of people, destroyed their culture and forced them to attempt to fit in with white culture, but never be truly welcome within that culture. What could be causing the situation where black on black crime is not being addressed correctly? Most black people are treated as second class citizens by white ideology, so that's what BLM are asking to be discussed. People mention Pakistani and Indian, these races weren't displaced in the same way as Africans, they are mostly economic migrants who bought there culture with them and adhere still adhere to it. Black culture has had to rebuild from being destroyed in recent history, but is having to do so whilst being oppressed. I'm not trying to be argumentative here, but it's not always helpful to see these issues through prisms of colour. If you have the time, invest 10 minutes listening to this guy, the reference to Glasgow and when he says that a knife crime where the knife is in a black hand suddenly becomes a black crime are key points for me, anyway, watch and let me know what you think; Well, I thought it was ten very profitable and instructive minutes of my life, watching that. An eloquent and captivating speaker. Nice to hear someone advancing that side of the argument, without feeling the need to screech "white privilege" every time someone says something they don`t like. I`d be quite happy to see him put in charge of attempting to sort out the sorry mess we`re in, although I expect there will be those on here who wouldn`t. I loved his modesty at the end too, needing to have his book plugged for him. I`ve got a week off at the beginning of next month; I shall buy it and read it.
|
|
|
Post by matealotblue on Jun 24, 2020 17:12:04 GMT
I'm not trying to be argumentative here, but it's not always helpful to see these issues through prisms of colour. If you have the time, invest 10 minutes listening to this guy, the reference to Glasgow and when he says that a knife crime where the knife is in a black hand suddenly becomes a black crime are key points for me, anyway, watch and let me know what you think; Well, I thought it was ten very profitable and instructive minutes of my life, watching that. An eloquent and captivating speaker. Nice to hear someone advancing that side of the argument, without feeling the need to screech "white privilege" every time someone says something they don`t like. I`d be quite happy to see him put in charge of attempting to sort out the sorry mess we`re in, although I expect there will be those on here who wouldn`t. I loved his modesty at the end too, needing to have his book plugged for him. I`ve got a week off at the beginning of next month; I shall buy it and read it. Mercy Muroki worth a listen to as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2020 17:25:44 GMT
You still mention black on black crime. Can't you ask yourself why there is more black on black crime? Does there skin colour make them do more crimes? What could possibly have happened in black history to have created a situation where there is more black on black crime? What traumatic event displaced millions of people, destroyed their culture and forced them to attempt to fit in with white culture, but never be truly welcome within that culture. What could be causing the situation where black on black crime is not being addressed correctly? Most black people are treated as second class citizens by white ideology, so that's what BLM are asking to be discussed. People mention Pakistani and Indian, these races weren't displaced in the same way as Africans, they are mostly economic migrants who bought there culture with them and adhere still adhere to it. Black culture has had to rebuild from being destroyed in recent history, but is having to do so whilst being oppressed. I'm not trying to be argumentative here, but it's not always helpful to see these issues through prisms of colour. If you have the time, invest 10 minutes listening to this guy, the reference to Glasgow and when he says that a knife crime where the knife is in a black hand suddenly becomes a black crime are key points for me, anyway, watch and let me know what you think; He made some good points. Shame his views will get little traction in the right leaning UK but it's good to have intelligent people on TV for a change, small wins.
|
|
pirate
Forum Legend
Posts: 19,435
|
Post by pirate on Jun 24, 2020 18:03:11 GMT
You'll have to forgive me butting in here, but in 1968 I was 7, so couldn't get past the door staff at The Dug Out, no matter how jaunty an angle I wore my beret at, so my question is, was there a time when it wasn't realised that Red Army Faction were in fact a murderous terrorist organisation? I get the student Citizen Smith thing, but surely with the benefit of hindsight we can filter out praise for a group with so much blood on their hands? The East German Stasi and the KGB provided funds, equipment, and networking opportunities for the Red Army Faction. It was basically their creation.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2020 18:34:50 GMT
I'm not trying to be argumentative here, but it's not always helpful to see these issues through prisms of colour. If you have the time, invest 10 minutes listening to this guy, the reference to Glasgow and when he says that a knife crime where the knife is in a black hand suddenly becomes a black crime are key points for me, anyway, watch and let me know what you think; He made some good points. Shame his views will get little traction in the right leaning UK but it's good to have intelligent people on TV for a change, small wins. Maybe better to find more of his work, then argue the same points, assuming you still agree of course, rather than just say that the UK is shafted and the diabolical right will never allow change. If you argue well, you'll convince people.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2020 20:11:38 GMT
I'm not trying to be argumentative here, but it's not always helpful to see these issues through prisms of colour. If you have the time, invest 10 minutes listening to this guy, the reference to Glasgow and when he says that a knife crime where the knife is in a black hand suddenly becomes a black crime are key points for me, anyway, watch and let me know what you think; Well, I thought it was ten very profitable and instructive minutes of my life, watching that. An eloquent and captivating speaker. Nice to hear someone advancing that side of the argument, without feeling the need to screech "white privilege" every time someone says something they don`t like. I`d be quite happy to see him put in charge of attempting to sort out the sorry mess we`re in, although I expect there will be those on here who wouldn`t. I loved his modesty at the end too, needing to have his book plugged for him. I`ve got a week off at the beginning of next month; I shall buy it and read it. Natives has been a decent and balanced read so far- challenged some of my perceptions and agreed with me on others.
|
|